Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!

Freedom Fighter wrote:
> "Al Dykes" <adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:fuvhk5$14e$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In article <48133f98$0$11625$607ed4bc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> Reggie  <Reggie501@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php/latest-news-at-a-glance/911-news-at-a-glanceB
>>>
>>> BC Anchor Who Re****ted on WTC7 Collapse Early Agrees There May Be a
>>> 'Conspiracy'
>>>
>>> Hayton failed to recollect even being in the studio on the day of
>>> 9/11-- at first-- but then recalls the situation when it is
>>> described in detail, including the actions of Jane Standley, who
>>> re****ted the collapse some 26 minutes in advance with WTC Building
>>> 7 still visible in the background.
>>>
>>> "A lot of eyebrows were raised," We Are Change re****ters point out
>>> in summary, because many saw it as a clear controlled demolition,
>>> including a number of engineers.
>
>> The whole world knew that WTC7 was about to collapse.  The poor BBC
>> news reader made a mistake and said it "had collapsed" instead of
>> "about to collapse".  Jeesh.
>
> CNN made the same "mistake." Looks like they read the script too soon
> -
>> The inevitable collapse of WTC7 was in local TV news on the afternoon
>> of 9/11. I saw it, myself. See [7], below.
>
> Inevitable? Then how come several buildings with far worse damage
> remained standing, including the Deutchbank building, which recently
> survived yet ANOTHER extensive fire without any collapse?

Obviously these other buildings did not sustain this far worse damage that

you claim.

> I SAW building 7 collapse on live TV. Controlled demolition by
> explosives, no doubt about it!

That's it.  I'm sold on it.  You saw it on TV, it has to be so clear (to 
you).

>
>> k00ks love to - -
>
> Ah, yes, when all else fails, the desperate deniers and coverup ****lls
> always resort to adolescent name-calling. Poor frustrated childish
> minds!

And yet, it is highly probable that he is correct.

>
>> Nobody that was an eyewitness to the WTC7 collapse can say there was
>> anything unusual about the way it collapsed.
>
> I saw it on live TV, and I am an engineer. And I say CONTROLLED
> DEMOLITION BY EXPLOSIVES!

So, you're the one engineer in the world that is infallible. Never made a 
mistake, never had to go from numeric to alpha revision.

> And more im****tant than my personal opinion, the inviolate LAWS OF
> PHYSICS say the same:

And there are studies that show the opposite. There is no indisputable
proof 
either way.  You're an engineer, so you should know better.  You give the 
rest of us a bad name.  Shame on you.

<deleted for brevity>