Talk About Network

Google





Alternative > Conspiracy - New-World-Order > Re: 9/11 may be...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 48 of 65 Topic 6861 of 7709
Post > Topic >>

Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!

by "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 27, 2008 at 12:30 AM

> "Al Dykes" <adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message

> > The inevitable collapse of WTC7 was in local TV news on the afternoon
> > of 9/11.

Inevitable ?!?!?     The complete and simultaneous total failure of every
connected
steel beam in a steel framed and steel-cored, 47 storey skyscraper (due to
isolated
fires) was somehow "inevitable" to you ?

What a complete fool you are to still be spouting this propaganda
bull****.

http://www.answers.com/topic/researchers-questioning-the-official-account-of-9-11



> I saw it, myself.

Sure........

ON TEEVEE.... and you were ignorant enough to believe every word of the
propaganda and dis-information that was spewed forth with the video of
that
day, yet never to be seen again on mainstream media even though the twin
towers collapse was shown dozens of times a day for months on end.

Here's some available research for ya', jello-brains....  You will say
that
you've seen it all before and that it's 'k00k' conspiracy crap, which as
usual,
is your standard pack of lies.... but it isn't for anyone as freaking dumb
as
you, Dykes... it's for people who just might care about their nation.

___



911 RESEARCH: http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.wtc7.net
www.wtc7.net/videos.html

The Science: Fires and Buildings:
911 PHYSICS http://www.physics911.org

FIREFIGHTERS VS 911 COMMISSION
<http://www.911lies.org/fire_fighters_911_wtc_tapes.html>

Muslims suspend laws of physics:
http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/physics_1.html
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/mslp_ii.htm


The Implosion (so-called 'collapse') of WTC Building 7, coupled with the
absence of substantiating evidence of a 757 cra****ng into the Pentagon
are probably the biggest government screw-ups.  More links to Bldg 7
and the Pentagon mixed in below.
http://www.911research.wtc7.net/cache/wtc/evidence/usgs_hotspots.html
http://www.wtc7.net/background.html
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/bbc_wtc7_videos.html


Here are some photos of WTC4, which was much closer to the towers
than WTC7, and was completely gutted by severe fires and partially
crushed by heavy impacts.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc4des1.html

This photo of WTC4 really demonstrates the incredible strength of
steel framed buildings.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/docs/bjh/14.jpg

Here are some photos of WTC5 & 6 after the tower demolitions.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/gzpo1.html

Here's a photo of WTC7 after the tower demolitions.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc7fire3.html

This illustration shows the location of the various WTC buildings
as well as the range of debris impact.
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/b7/collateral.html

Here are photos of WTC7's "inferno".
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc7fire1.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/attack/wtc7.html


Here is a video of WTC7's picture perfect controlled demolition.
http://www.911research.com/wtc/evidence/videos/docs/wtc7_collapse2.mpg


Here are more videos of WTC7's demolition.
  http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html

         We're still waiting for the kooks to provide us with a logical
        explanation other than controlled demolition for the fact that the
        buildings closest to the towers remained standing, while WTC7's
        massive hurricane resistant steel frame suddenly disintegrated and
        dropped at virtual free fall speed and perfect symmetry. Limited,
        isolated fires can not possibly cause such a failure. In fact, no
        steel framed building has ever collapsed due to fire.

        It seems controlled demolition is the only possible cause of
WTC7's
        demolition. Even Bush's FEMA was forced to admit the following:

      "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the
building
        to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel
fuel
        on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best
hypothesis
        has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research,
        investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue."


  http://911research.wtc7.net
  http://stj911.org
  http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html
  http://www.911truth.org

Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.
  http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html

On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.

  http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
  http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm

911: Coincidence Theory
The Coincidence Theorist's Guide to 9/11
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/archive/scoop/stories/60/5a/200408231012.3bb72110.html



THE BOGUS FEMA AND NIST INVESTIGATIONS...
This is the largest cover-up in American history, from a panel comprised
mostly
of Bush cabinet cronies with too many conflicting interests to be taken
seriously.
Who themselves, complain that there was too little money, too little time,
and too
much "pressure" to complete the re****t with enough accuracy.  It's based
on
assumptions and contains overtly false information, and failed to answer
the
questions which when finally raised legally, forced the government to
appoint
the team... but long after the country was at was and the 911 evidence
removed.
http://vancouver.indymedia.org/?q=node/1634
http://911research.wtc7.net/resources/books/index.html
http://www.septembereleventh.org/
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2006/911-WTC-NIST-Lies30mar06.htm
http://www.911review.com/coverup/nist.html
http://visibility911.libsyn.com/
http://www.answers.com/topic/researchers-questioning-the-official-account-of-9-11
http://www.organicconsumers.org/politics/911012306.cfm
http://www.justicefor911.org/Contents_and_Evidence_111904.php
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/print_friendly.php?p=opedne_sheila_s_060329_9_2f11____eliminating_.htm
http://www.911citizenswatch.org/print.php?sid=895
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060405143535564
http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/Article/Interrogating_9-11_Five_Years_On.html
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=4418&st=2040
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=4418&st=2010
http://worldtradecentertruth.com/Article_1_Ryan5.pdf#search=%22NIST%20re****t%20on%20911%2C%20Omissions%20and%20distortions%22
http://www.vtcommons.org/node/190
http://www.tpmcafe.com/node/28070
http://911smokingguns.com/
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=21137











            "The bigger the lie and the more often it's repeated, the more
who believe it."

               -- Josef Goebbels - Nazi German 'Minister of Propaganda' 
1897-1945
 




 65 Posts in Topic:
9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
Reggie <Reggie501@[EMA  2008-04-26 10:43:42 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-26 11:27:01 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"Freedom Fighter&quo  2008-04-26 20:32:31 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"L Alpert" <  2008-04-26 19:08:02 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 00:34:13 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-26 21:10:55 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-04-26 18:56:03 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 03:42:51 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:35:26 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-04-27 09:23:53 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 18:00:11 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 14:43:15 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-04-27 12:40:33 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 22:26:32 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-04-27 20:06:38 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
Major Debacle <Major_D  2008-04-28 03:15:43 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-28 03:30:13 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
Major Debacle <Major_D  2008-04-27 20:33:22 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-28 05:20:10 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 14:39:55 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:30:50 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"L Alpert" <  2008-04-27 09:00:38 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 18:10:07 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 14:41:00 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 14:44:34 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"L Alpert" <  2008-04-27 16:32:58 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"Freedom Fighter&quo  2008-04-28 01:53:55 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-28 02:15:34 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 22:23:18 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 22:21:52 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-28 11:12:28 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"L Alpert" <  2008-04-29 00:12:25 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-29 06:37:21 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
ram03@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 03:12:30 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 10:14:28 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
ram03@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 12:28:52 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 19:22:20 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
ram03@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 12:28:04 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 19:22:31 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 19:43:07 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
rhyolite@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-29 19:26:14 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 21:36:25 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
sanoli@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 21:04:43 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 22:31:17 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-30 00:39:55 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-30 06:13:00 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 22:33:23 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 00:30:44 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-26 21:12:26 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:39:39 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 21:09:21 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 01:19:43 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:42:02 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 14:40:51 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 22:25:05 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 21:07:29 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:29:16 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
jpsmith123@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-26 17:50:38 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:45:30 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
jpsmith123@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-27 16:08:40 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-28 00:30:08 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 21:16:12 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 21:23:59 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 21:12:03 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 21:18:20 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 23:38:21 PST 2009.