Talk About Network

Google





Alternative > Conspiracy - New-World-Order > Re: 9/11 may be...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 65 Topic 6861 of 7709
Post > Topic >>

Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!

by "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 27, 2008 at 03:42 AM

"tankfixer" <paul.carrier@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> sputtered...

> Lots of opinion and no facts.








http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=closed_minds_on_911

http://www.archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive

http://georgewa****ngton.blogspot.com/2007/05/structural-engineers-question-collapse.html

http://www.911sharethetruth.com/

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/index.html

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Resources.html

http://www.reopen911.org/

http://patriotsquestion911.com/

http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org

http://www.911weknow.com/linkspage.htm

http://question911.com/links.php

http://www.flight77.info/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Researchers_questioning_the_official_account_of_9/11

http://www.answers.com/topic/researchers-questioning-the-official-account-of-9-11

www.WingTV.net

http://911truth.org

http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/Article/Interrogating_9-11_Five_Years_On.html

http://worldtradecentertruth.com/

http://journalof911studies.com/

http://ae911truth.org/

http://www.vermontguardian.com/commentary/032007/TwinTowers.shtml

http://911proof.com/10.html

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/engineers.html



911 FOR THE TRUTH: http://www.911forthetruth.com

911 RESEARCH: http://911research.wtc7.net

The Science: Fires and Buildings:
911 PHYSICS http://www.physics911.org

FIREFIGHTERS VS 911 COMMISSION
<http://www.911lies.org/fire_fighters_911_wtc_tapes.html>

Muslims suspend laws of physics:
http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/physics_1.html
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/mslp_ii.htm



Network in Britain and Ireland which agregates the efforts of all those
campaigning
in Europe for 911 truth. www.nineeleven.co.uk

http://www.vestigialconscience.com/
  Misc. archived conspiracy evidence



Project for a New American Century Planned Iraq War Long Ago....
Information Clearing House
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1665.htm
MSNBC Article: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6814437
The Project's Web Site http://www.newamericancentury.org/


9-11 and the IMPOSSIBLE http://home.comcast.net/~skydrifter/exp.htm


The Implosion (so-called 'collapse') of WTC Building 7, coupled with the
absence of substantiating evidence of a 757 cra****ng into the Pentagon
are probably the biggest government screw-ups.  More links to Bldg 7
and the Pentagon mixed in below.
http://www.911research.wtc7.net/cache/wtc/evidence/usgs_hotspots.html
http://www.wtc7.net/background.html
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/bbc_wtc7_videos.html


EXPLOSIVES??
http://69.28.73.17/thornarticles/powerdown.html
http://www.nynewsday.com/news/local/manhattan/wtc/ny-nyaler122362178sep12,0,6794009.story
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/Tower2Pulled.mp3
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/Tower1Pulled.mp3
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/911.wtc.ann.thompson.cars.wmv
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/911.wtc.secondary.explosions.jeffrey.beatty.wmv
http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/article/1518131/28031.htm

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871


The World Trade Center Demolition and the So-Called War on Terrorism
http://www.serendipity.li/wtc.htm



News and Resources on 9/11:

911 ONLINE RESEARCH http://www.cooperativeresearch.org

911 REVIEW http://www.911review.org
(available in multiple languages)

911 TRUTH Los Angeles http://www.911truthla.us

9/11 VISIBILITY PROJECT National Campaign Center
http://www.septembereleventh.org

American Free Press: www.americanfreepress.net/

KILLTOWN 911 REVIEW http://killtown.911review.org

Karl W. B. Schwarz - Online Journal - Great Source on Financial Basis for
9/11
http://onlinejournal.com/

****TLAND INDEPENDENT MEDIA CENTER http://****tland.indymedia.org

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS http://www.unansweredquestions.org

INTERNATIONAL CITIZEN'S INQUIRY INTO 9/11 http://www.911inquiry.org

PETITION OF SOLIDARITY http://justicefor911.org

"WHAT FAILED" -On Plague Puppy:
http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/Confronting%20the%20Evidence/what_failed_and_how.htm

Conspiracy News Net http://www.conspiracynewsnet.com/

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com

http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/

Hijacking Catastophe - http://207.44.245.159/article6895.htm

Black Boxes coverup   http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BUN410B.html


Failure to defend America: (more of Paul Thompson's Timeline)
http://www.billstclair.com/911timeline/main/essayairdefense.html
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0306/S00031.htm


9-11 Motivation
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/utley7.html


911: Coincidence Theory
The Coincidence Theorist's Guide to 9/11
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/archive/scoop/stories/60/5a/200408231012.3bb72110.html


Dov Zakheim, Pentagon Comptroller, ran drone plane company.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?noframes;read=53486


Craig Hill's New Video: "Treason, Inc."
Craig Hill do***ents the lies and actions of the Bush adminstration that
amount to treason.
Order here: http://www.hillsenatenow.org/



Some Alternative News Sites:

CITIZENS FOR LEGIT GOVERNMENT http://legitgov.org

MICHAEL RUPPERT'S http://www.fromthewilderness.com

MARK CRISPIN MILLER'S http://markcrispinmiller.blogspot.com/

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/
http://www.alternet.org/
http://www.yellowtimes.org/
http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtml
http://www.antiwar.com
http://www.iraqwar.org/
http://www.tvnewslies.org/
http://www.prisonPlanet.com
http://www.Infowars.com
http://www.libertyforum.org

The Emperors New Clothes http://www.tenc.net/



Some Conspiracy Theory Sites:

911 CITIZEN'S WATCH: http://www.911citizenswatch.org
911 STRIKE http://www.911-strike.com
911 SKEPTICS UNITE http://911skeptics.blogspot.com
911 SHARE THE TRUTH http://www.911sharethetruth.com
PROPOSITION 911 http://www.proposition911.org
SCOTT LEDGER'S TRUTH SITE: http://www.scottledger.com


Scientific Evidence that Official 9/11 Story is a Lie
http://www.ditrianum.org/Artikelen/artikel33en.htm


Videos and Media:

911 BUSTERS http://www.911busters.com
http://www.911busters.com/911-Commission.html

DOWNLOAD VIDEOS HERE:  http://question911.com/links.php

SNOWSHOE DO***ENTARY FILMS http://www.snowshoefilms.com/911coverup.html

Watch the movie 'September 11 Revisited' online at http://www.twf.org
--
click on
link in left hand column; or see:  http://www.911revisited.com/

911 TRUTH RADIO http://www.911truthradio.com

VIDEO ANALYSIS BY ALEX JONES:
WTC7 - THE HIDDEN STORY OF BUILDING: 7 http://www.wtc7.net

IN PLANE SITE: http://www.911inplanesite.com

LOOSE CHANGE:  http://www.loosechange911.com/

www.wtc7.net/videos.html
http://www.911busters.com
http://www.libertybound.com
www.infowars.com/videos.html#MOT
http://www.infowars.com/videos.html
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3995.htm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/globaloutlook/coverup.html
http://www.innworldre****t.net
http://www.911truthbristol.com/videos/films.html
http://www.911tv.org


                            THE POWER OF NIGHTMARES
    Part One - 59 Minutes
    <http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8217638438978899371>
    Part Two - 59 Minutes
    <http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2839463332690200955>
    Part Three - 59 Minutes
    <http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3649090417189127240>

"EagarBeavers and Faulty Towers"
http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/Confronting%20the%20Evidence/what_failed_and_how.htm

Webster Tarpley audio interview  (low bit rate... easy to stream on
dial-up)
http://www.cloakanddagger.de/shows/webcast/_Tarpley_/CLOAK_TARPLEYNOV14.mp3




9/11 VISIBILITY PROJECT National Campaign Center:
http://www.septembereleventh.org

NEW YORK 9/11 Truth: http://www.summeroftruth.org
or  http://www.ny911truth.org

Hot Politics - By Owen Whitman
Libertarian website with many 9/11 and Iraq War articles.
www.hotpolitics.com




PENTAGON
Until the wall collapsed, the hole in the Pentagon was a 17 ft circle
(approximately)
which penetrated 6 steel-reinforced concrete walls... directly into the
newly beefed-up
(structurally remodeled) area which was tem****arily housing the NIS, who
were then
investigating the $2.3 TRILLION dollars in MISSING Pentagon funds.  An
issue, that
like Enron, was immediately dropped from the news and swept under the
carpet.
Any public evidence of bodies or aircraft wreckage from the Pentagon is
virtually
non-existant.
http://judicial-inc.biz/pentagon_flight.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flight77.htm
http://0911.site.voila.fr/
http://0911.site.voila.fr/index11.htm
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm
http://www.loosechange911.com/pentagon.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1907955.stm
http://www.thepowerhour.com/911_analysis/pentagon-911.htm
http://www.serendipity.li/wtc3.htm
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/pentagon.html
http://judicial-inc.biz/Dov_Zakheim_Fl_77.htm
http://www.amics21.com/911/pentagon.html
http://www.wanttoknow.info/911information
www.PentagonResearch.com


Thierry Meyssan, Original French Author Exposing the possible Pentagon
Hoax  http://www.pentagate.info/sommaire-en.html
 -- his website recently
has been closed, but early news (April, 2002) of this Frenchman's book on
the 'alleged' Pentagon crash is here...
http://www.nationalreview.com/robbins/robbins040902.asp
(Now you know why we had "freedom fries" for so long)


911 SEISMIC DATA:
Seismic data was, of course, COMPLETELY OMITTED from both NIST and FEMA
re****ts.
http://www.rense.com/general67/forensic.htm
http://uscrisis.lege.net/911/
http://anderson.ath.cx:8000/911/hj07.html
<2002>  http://www.rense.com/general28/ioff.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_LDEO_KIM.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm
http://www.mgs.md.gov/esic/publications/download/911pentagon.pdf


More on flight 93
http://killtown.911review.org/htb2.html
http://letsroll911.org/phpwebsite/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=34


THE 911 OSAMA CONFESSION TAPE...
Have you asked yourself the same question regarding the
original Osama / 911  'confession'  tape?   A small child
could determine that this was completely faked.
http://www.viewzone.com/osama.html
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html
http://www.mujca.com/osama.htm
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/farenheit911michaelmoore.html
http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/realityzone/UFNOsamatapefake.htm
http://tim.2wgroup.com/blog/archives/001006.html
http://www.freedomisforeverybody.org/Osama%20bin%20CIA%20Agent.php?id=1521491
http://www.aljazeera.com/me.asp?service_ID=11633
http://www.ilaam.net/Sept11/TapeIsFraud.html


Current Osama Info:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=SCH20060601&articleId=2555
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=15490
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=4592
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/osamafakedtape30may06.shtml
http://www.rebelwarez.com/rebelblog/2006/09/08/bin-laden-tape-betrays-phony-hijacker-contradiction/
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/PressRelease28May2006.html
http://www.williambowles.info/spysrus/osama_fake.html
http://www.ilaam.net/Sept11/TapeIsFraud.html
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=76&contentid=413&page=2

ON bin LADEN...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8853000/site/newsweek/
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/030804fa_fact
http://www.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2002/02/05/usat-binladen-frustration.htm
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7932.shtml
http://www.rinf.com/columnists/news/cia-operative-says-bush-military-leaders-let-bin-laden-escape
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/24/pentagon.binladen/index.html
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/FJ26Ag01.html
http://www.infowars.com/articles/iraq/let_laden_escape.htm
http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A62618-2002Apr16&notFound=true
http://www.oilempire.us/bushbinladen.html


ON ZARQARI ...
http://www.taylormarsh.com/archives_view.php?id=2301
http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/us-allowed-zarqawi-to-escape/2006/04/30/1146335608444.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/trey-ellis/who-will-finally-explain-_b_7585.html
http://mediamatters.org/items/200410270007
http://www.democrats.com/zarqawi
http://www.juancole.com/2005/12/one-that-got-away-cnn-is-re****ting.html


Where does GWB fit in?   www.bushdid911.org


WERE THE BUSH AND BinLADEN FAMILIES IN BUSINESS TOGETHER?
http://www.oilempire.us/bush-binladen.html
http://www.bushwatch.com/bushmoney.htm
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/conspiracytheories/saudi.html
http://www.hereinreality.com/carlyle.html
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/articleshow?art_id=1030259305
http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=971322003
http://tvnewslies.org/html/bin_laden_ties.html
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/09_18_01_bushbin.html
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/10_09_01_carlyle.html
http://www.waynemadsenre****t.com/
http://www.judicialwatch.org/1685.shtml
http://www.rense.com/general14/bushsformer.htm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/bin_laden_family_link_to_bush.html
http://www.inthesetimes.com/issue/25/25/feature3.shtml
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/WAL110A.html
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?011112fa_FACT3
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3308.htm
http://www.thedubyare****t.com/bushbin.html
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
http://martiallaw911.info/archive/0-26-39.htm
http://dir.salon.com/story/books/feature/2004/03/11/unger_1/index.html


OLDER BUSH'S - doing business with Germany in WW-II
Dial-up:  
http://70.84.33.210/%7Einfomedi/video/previews/150305martialpreview_mdm.wmv
DSL:  
http://70.84.33.210/%7Einfomedi/video/previews/150305martialpreview.wmv



The Presidential  "Signing Statement"  dictator****p...

http://www.abanet.org/media/releases/news072406.html
http://www.fff.org/comment/com0610c.asp
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20060113.html
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/signingstatements.php
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060721/21signing.htm
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/07/25/dobbs.july26/index.html
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1149361,00.htm
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/04/30/bush_challenges_hundreds_of_laws/
http://www.coherentbabble.com/signingstatements/TOCindex.htm
http://www.fff.org/comment/com0610c.asp
http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/27/AR2006062700145.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1828114,00.html?gusrc=rss
http://www.antiwar.com/ips/fisher.php?articleid=9222
http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/02/13/the-signing-statement-dictator****p/

And over one million more....
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=George+Bush%2C+signing+statements&btnG=Google+Search



"National Security Letters" (gag orders)  silence patriots, courts, media
& business
as they pry into America's private side.

http://www.techlawjournal.com/topstories/2005/20050824a.asp
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/ramasastry/20060109.html
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nationalsecurityletters/index.html
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/patriot/17458res20040929.html
http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/05/AR2005110501366.html
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/articles_2004/national_security_letters.html
http://www.sptimes.com/2005/11/13/Columns/National_security_let.shtml
http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200512/120805.html

And over 67 Million more....
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=National+security+letter&btnG=Google+Search




THE BOGUS FEMA AND NIST INVESTIGATIONS...
This is the largest cover-up in American history, from a panel comprised
mostly
of Bush cabinet cronies with too many conflicting interests to be taken
seriously.
Who themselves, complain that there was too little money, too little time,
and too
much "pressure" to complete the re****t with enough accuracy.  It's based
on
assumptions and contains overtly false information, and failed to answer
the
questions which when finally raised legally, forced the government to
appoint
the team... but long after the country was at was and the 911 evidence
removed.
http://vancouver.indymedia.org/?q=node/1634
http://911research.wtc7.net/resources/books/index.html
http://www.septembereleventh.org/
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2006/911-WTC-NIST-Lies30mar06.htm
http://www.911review.com/coverup/nist.html
http://visibility911.libsyn.com/
http://www.answers.com/topic/researchers-questioning-the-official-account-of-9-11
http://www.organicconsumers.org/politics/911012306.cfm
http://www.justicefor911.org/Contents_and_Evidence_111904.php
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/print_friendly.php?p=opedne_sheila_s_060329_9_2f11____eliminating_.htm
http://www.911citizenswatch.org/print.php?sid=895
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060405143535564
http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/Article/Interrogating_9-11_Five_Years_On.html
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=4418&st=2040
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=4418&st=2010
http://worldtradecentertruth.com/Article_1_Ryan5.pdf#search=%22NIST%20re****t%20on%20911%2C%20Omissions%20and%20distortions%22
http://www.vtcommons.org/node/190
http://www.tpmcafe.com/node/28070
http://911smokingguns.com/
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=21137




VOTE FRAUD
Vote Fraud MSNBC Video 2004 -
http://www.vestigialconscience.com/5.countdown_56k.mov
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_U.S._presidential_election_controversy_and_irregularities
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_United_States_presidential_election_controversy%2C_exit_polls
http://nightweed.com/usavotefacts.html
http://www.blackboxvoting.org
http://www.alternet.org/bloggers/evan/40755/
http://itpolicy.princeton.edu/voting/summary.html
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/2004votefraud.html
http://vote2004.eriposte.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2004/031104votefraud.htm
http://www.votersunite.org/electionproblems.asp
http://www.ideamouth.com/voterfraud.htm
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/2004_vote_fraud.html
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen
http://www.projectcensored.org/newsflash/voter_fraud.html
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0411/S00124.htm
http://www.legitgov.org/coup_2004.html
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/122404X.shtml
http://www.thewe.cc/contents/more/archive/united_states_voting_procedures.html
http://www.seminolechronicle.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2004/12/16/41c2fdb042ea1
Video / Bev Harris - http://prisonplanet.tv/audio/041104harris.htm
http://www.counterpunch.org/swanson11082004.html
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1118-22.htm
http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/election_2004.html
http://www.epionline.org/news_detail.cfm?rid=84
http://www.truthinvoting.org/
http://blackvoternetwork.com/votefraud.htm
http://www.flcv.com/fraudpat.html
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/110504Chin/110504chin.html

More links at http://www.squadron13.com/JackDresser/electionfraud.htm
And at bottom... http://www.pamrotella.com/polhist/elections2004.html

        "We cannot accept this result as legitimate, because it does not
meet
        international standards. We call for a full review of the conduct
of the
        election and the tallying."    --Colin Powell on the 2004 election


Outraged republican moderates: 
http://www.outragedmoderates.org/Page4.html


Who in current government served their nation in combat?
http://www.awolbush.com/
http://www.awolbush.com/cheney.html
http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html
http://www.democrats.com/display.cfm?id=165
http://www.rackjite.com/chawks.htm
http://www.houstonpress.com/issues/1999-01-07/columns2.html/1/index.html



MEDIA CONTROL
5 companies (well, 6 really) control ALL of the media you see or hear
in the United States.  Each of these makes so much money that
there is little chance of them hurting. You can view the information
on the controlling interests below.  These are tough times in America
and many things about media (like conglomerates and control) seriously
need to be fixed, so that this country isn't jointly spoon fed the lies
which
could lead to it's demise.

http://www.nowfoundation.org/issues/communications/tv/mediacontrol.html



ILLUMINATI...  (Also referred to as: "The New World Order")
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illuminati
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/illuminatiagendabestoverviewyet8jun02.shtml
http://www.rotten.com/library/conspiracy/illuminati/
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Illuminati.htm
http://www.geocities.com/francis_uy/halliburton.html
http://skepdic.com/illuminati.html
http://www.mysteries-megasite.com/main/bigsearch/luminati.html
http://poweredbychrist.homestead.com/files/bush/rituals.htm
'Illuminati' has been a part of world history for centuries and is
highly threatening to a peaceful humanity.


SKULL & BONES....
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/white_house_bonesman_leads_nation_into_the_dark.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skull_and_Bones
http://www.jeremiahproject.com/newworldorder/nworder03.html
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/02/60minutes/main576332.shtml
http://www.parascope.com/articles/0997/skullbones.htm
http://www.freedomdomain.com/skullbones.html
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/bones.htm
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8425/BONES.HTM
http://www.rotten.com/library/conspiracy/skull-and-bones/


Casual commentary style re****ting from March 28, 2006
"Eliminating the Impossible"   By Sheila Samples
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/print_friendly.php?p=opedne_sheila_s_060329_9_2f11____eliminating_.htm


http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JonesWTC911SciMethod.pdf

  "The metallic element ingredients along with sulfur can be determined
with considerable certainty. Done carefully, the presence of the
aluminothermic reaction signature is quite unambiguous; as stated by
Materials Engineering, Inc. (MEi):
•  “When thermite reaction compounds are used to ignite a fire, they
produce a characteristic burn pattern and leave behind evidence. These
compounds are rather unique in their chemical composition, containing
common elements such as copper, iron, calcium, silicon and aluminum, but
also contain more unusual elements, such as vanadium, titanium, tin,
fluorine and manganese. While some of these elements are consumed in the
fire, many are also left behind in the residue…
•  MEi has conducted Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) on minute
traces of residue, identifying the presence of these chemical elements.
The results, coupled with visual evidence at the scene, provide absolute
certainty that thermite reaction compounds were present, indicating the
fire was deliberately set, and not of natural causes.”47

Note that the NFPA 921Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations
clearly states:
“Unusual residues might remain from the initial fuel. Those residues
could arise from thermite, magnesium, or other pyrotechnic materials.”48
This is the standard procedure for fire and explosion investigations –
looking for thermite residues. Was it applied to the WTC “crime scene”?
NIST was asked:
•  Question: ““Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues?
The combination of thermite and sulfur (called thermate) "slices through
steel like a hot knife through butter."
•  Answer; “NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the
steel.” 49 NIST is remiss in not testing for thermite residues as
required by the NFPA 921 code. We are testing for these residues and
invite other serious researchers to join us. The EDS methods are well
established."


http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JonesWTC911SciMethod.pdf

Here are some photos of WTC4, which was much closer to the towers
than WTC7, and was completely gutted by severe fires and partially
crushed by heavy impacts.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc4des1.html

 This photo of WTC4 really demonstrates the incredible strength of
steel framed buildings.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/docs/bjh/14.jpg

 Here are some photos of WTC5 & 6 after the tower demolitions.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/gzpo1.html

Here's a photo of WTC7 after the tower demolitions.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc7fire3.html

 This illustration shows the location of the various WTC buildings
as well as the range of debris impact.
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/b7/collateral.html

Here are photos of WTC7's "inferno".
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc7fire1.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/attack/wtc7.html

Here is a video of WTC7's picture perfect controlled demolition.
http://www.911research.com/wtc/evidence/videos/docs/wtc7_collapse2.mpg

  Here are more videos of WTC7's demolition.
  http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html


  We're still waiting for the kooks to provide us with a logical
explanation other than controlled demolition for the fact that the
buildings closest to the towers remained standing, while WTC7's
massive hurricane resistant steel frame suddenly disintegrated and
dropped at virtual free fall speed and perfect symmetry. Limited,
isolated fires can not possibly cause such a failure. In fact, no
steel framed building has ever collapsed due to fire.

It seems controlled demolition is the only possible cause of WTC7's
demolition. Even Bush's FEMA was forced to admit the following:

  "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building
to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel
on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis
has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research,
investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue."

http://11syyskuu.blogspot.com/2006/02/destruction-of-wtc-7.html


-- 

  http://911research.wtc7.net
  http://stj911.org
  http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html
  http://www.911truth.org



  Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
  to raging infernos for hours on end.

  http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html


On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.

  http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
  http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm

  Ever wonder who benefits from the 700 MILLION
  U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq?
  http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm
  http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21

  "They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
  there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
  take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
  who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
  warfare or morality."
  -bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq.
   http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm

  http://www.commondreams.org/
  http://thirdworldtraveler.com/
 




 65 Posts in Topic:
9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
Reggie <Reggie501@[EMA  2008-04-26 10:43:42 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-26 11:27:01 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"Freedom Fighter&quo  2008-04-26 20:32:31 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"L Alpert" <  2008-04-26 19:08:02 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 00:34:13 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-26 21:10:55 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-04-26 18:56:03 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 03:42:51 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:35:26 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-04-27 09:23:53 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 18:00:11 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 14:43:15 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-04-27 12:40:33 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 22:26:32 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-04-27 20:06:38 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
Major Debacle <Major_D  2008-04-28 03:15:43 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-28 03:30:13 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
Major Debacle <Major_D  2008-04-27 20:33:22 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-28 05:20:10 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 14:39:55 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:30:50 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"L Alpert" <  2008-04-27 09:00:38 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 18:10:07 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 14:41:00 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 14:44:34 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"L Alpert" <  2008-04-27 16:32:58 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"Freedom Fighter&quo  2008-04-28 01:53:55 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-28 02:15:34 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 22:23:18 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 22:21:52 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-28 11:12:28 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"L Alpert" <  2008-04-29 00:12:25 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-29 06:37:21 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
ram03@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 03:12:30 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 10:14:28 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
ram03@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 12:28:52 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 19:22:20 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
ram03@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 12:28:04 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 19:22:31 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 19:43:07 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
rhyolite@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-29 19:26:14 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 21:36:25 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
sanoli@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 21:04:43 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 22:31:17 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-30 00:39:55 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-30 06:13:00 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 22:33:23 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 00:30:44 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-26 21:12:26 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:39:39 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 21:09:21 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 01:19:43 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:42:02 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 14:40:51 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 22:25:05 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 21:07:29 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:29:16 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
jpsmith123@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-26 17:50:38 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:45:30 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
jpsmith123@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-27 16:08:40 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-28 00:30:08 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 21:16:12 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 21:23:59 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 21:12:03 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 21:18:20 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 23:28:48 PST 2009.