Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!

In article <zjMQj.253893$cQ1.235008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Freedom Fighter <liberty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>"Al Dykes" <adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:fuvhk5$14e$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In article <48133f98$0$11625$607ed4bc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> Reggie  <Reggie501@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php/latest-news-at-a-glance/911-news-at-a-glanceB
>>>
>>>BC Anchor Who Re****ted on WTC7 Collapse Early Agrees There May Be a
>>>'Conspiracy'
>>>
>>>Hayton failed to recollect even being in the studio on the day of
9/11-- 
>>>at first-- but then recalls the situation when it is described in
>>>detail, including the actions of Jane Standley, who re****ted the
>>>collapse some 26 minutes in advance with WTC Building 7 still visible
in
>>>the background.
>>>
>>>"A lot of eyebrows were raised," We Are Change re****ters point out in
>>>summary, because many saw it as a clear controlled demolition,
including
>>>a number of engineers.
>
>> The whole world knew that WTC7 was about to collapse.  The poor BBC
>> news reader made a mistake and said it "had collapsed" instead of
>> "about to collapse".  Jeesh.
>
>CNN made the same "mistake." Looks like they read the script too soon -
>
>> The inevitable collapse of WTC7 was in local TV news on the afternoon
>> of 9/11. I saw it, myself. See [7], below.
>
>Inevitable? Then how come several buildings with far worse damage
remained 




Read and learn: 

   http://mceer.buffalo.edu/publications/wtc/02-SP02Screen.pdf

WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 were unique in the world.

No buildings in history were all-steel construction, built with
minimal fire-proofing, doused with thousands of gallons of fuel, set
afire and allowed to burn for hours without any firefighting or
sprinklers.  WTC1, 2, and 7 were unique in that way.



-- 
Al Dykes
 News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is
advertising.
    - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail