Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!

"L Alpert" <alpertl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message...

> David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:

> > Nope.... there are paid "opinions" that state the opposite.  There
isn't anything
> > that actually *proves* the government's story.... nothing at all with
the exception
> > of a bunch of "because we said so" crappola opinion and commentary.

> It's all opinion and interpretation of data, and all have their own
agenda.

Agreed.... but it's quite easy to determine the neo-con apparatus by
following
the money and the sup****t structure for carrying out the agenda.  The
'think-
tanks' that provided the money for the bogus cover stories, slathered with
opinion and innuendo and grossly lacking is *any* form of scientific
basis,
are a serious part of the grand illusion being passed off on Americans.

And as I said... there is *still* absolutely NO scientific or logical
basis
for the events which took place on 911, that actually _sup****t_ ANY
story that the US Government has put forth.  The causes, reasoning,
and double-speak substantiation for the awkward events of 911 remains
to this day to be nothing more than, "Because we said so...."









       "America is a quarter of a billion people totally misinformed and
        disinformed by their government. This is tragic but our media is
-- I
        wouldn't even say corrupt -- it's just beyond telling us anything
that
        the government doesn't want us to know."
                                           -- Gore Vidal