Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:30:08 GMT, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)"
<findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
><jpsmith123@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:c3caa03a-e34d-4128-98d5-6062c191fc4a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> On Apr 27, 8:45 am, ady...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Al Dykes) lied rabidly in
message...
>
>> > There are no eyewitnesses that re****t man-made explosives during the
>> > WTC7 collapse. By 5PM the place was swarming with steel workers,
>> > engineers, firemen and at least one demolition expert. None of them
>> > re****t anything but collapse due to fire and damage.
>
>That's really goooooood there, urine-for-brains... the only problem is,
that
>the building didn't implode until 5:20pm, so all your alleged 'workers'
would
>be dead as doornails.

You really have trouble comprehending the English language, don't you
skypileit?

>> Funny that several teams of engineers can't seem to
>> explain how the ****in' thing came down isn't it?.
>
>
>Neither did FEMA or NIST.....
>
>FEMA:
>
>    "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building
>    to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel
fuel
>    on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best
hypothesis
>    has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research,
investigation,
>    and analyses are needed to resolve this issue."

You really should back up and read section 5.6 of the FEMA re****t,
skypileit.