Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!

In article <T6aRj.134514$D_3.120265@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Freedom Fighter <liberty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>"L Alpert" <alpertl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:mBOQj.3431$I55.73@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Freedom Fighter wrote:
>>> "Al Dykes" <adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:fuvhk5$14e$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> In article <48133f98$0$11625$607ed4bc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>> Reggie  <Reggie501@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php/latest-news-at-a-glance/911-news-at-a-glanceB
>>>>>
>>>>> BC Anchor Who Re****ted on WTC7 Collapse Early Agrees There May Be a
>>>>> 'Conspiracy'
>>>>>
>>>>> Hayton failed to recollect even being in the studio on the day of
>>>>> 9/11-- at first-- but then recalls the situation when it is
>>>>> described in detail, including the actions of Jane Standley, who
>>>>> re****ted the collapse some 26 minutes in advance with WTC Building
>>>>> 7 still visible in the background.
>>>>>
>>>>> "A lot of eyebrows were raised," We Are Change re****ters point out
>>>>> in summary, because many saw it as a clear controlled demolition,
>>>>> including a number of engineers.
>>>
>>>> The whole world knew that WTC7 was about to collapse.  The poor BBC
>>>> news reader made a mistake and said it "had collapsed" instead of
>>>> "about to collapse".  Jeesh.
>>>
>>> CNN made the same "mistake." Looks like they read the script too soon
>>> -
>>>> The inevitable collapse of WTC7 was in local TV news on the afternoon
>>>> of 9/11. I saw it, myself. See [7], below.
>>>
>>> Inevitable? Then how come several buildings with far worse damage
>>> remained standing, including the Deutchbank building, which recently
>>> survived yet ANOTHER extensive fire without any collapse?
>>
>> Obviously these other buildings did not sustain this far worse damage
that 
>> you claim.
>>
>>> I SAW building 7 collapse on live TV. Controlled demolition by
>>> explosives, no doubt about it!
>>
>> That's it.  I'm sold on it.  You saw it on TV, it has to be so clear
(to 
>> you).
>>
>>>
>>>> k00ks love to - -
>>>
>>> Ah, yes, when all else fails, the desperate deniers and coverup ****lls
>>> always resort to adolescent name-calling. Poor frustrated childish
>>> minds!
>>
>> And yet, it is highly probable that he is correct.
>>
>>>
>>>> Nobody that was an eyewitness to the WTC7 collapse can say there was
>>>> anything unusual about the way it collapsed.
>>>
>>> I saw it on live TV, and I am an engineer. And I say CONTROLLED
>>> DEMOLITION BY EXPLOSIVES!
>>
>> So, you're the one engineer in the world that is infallible. Never made
a 
>> mistake, never had to go from numeric to alpha revision.
>>
>>> And more im****tant than my personal opinion, the inviolate LAWS OF
>>> PHYSICS say the same:
>>
>> And there are studies that show the opposite. There is no indisputable 
>> proof either way.  You're an engineer, so you should know better.  You 
>> give the rest of us a bad name.  Shame on you.
>
>YOU are an engineer?

>Then you know that "certainty" is not 100%, but a matter of
probabilities.
>Given the preponderance of credible evidence, and the destruction of hard

>evidence among other incriminating acts, I'd say the probability if 9/11 
>being an INSIDE JOB are around 95%. 



Since you refuse to speak to anyone that disagrees with k00k claims
and your alleged physics paper, how have you calculated the percentage
at all, let alone to two significant digits?

To one significant digit, the percentage of self-identified experts
that sup****t "Truth Movement" claims is 0%.


When are we going to see your paper posted where relevant engineers
hang out?

Repeatedly claiming to be an engineer and posting your paper where
nobody that identifies themselves as an expert in anything relevant to
your paper and challenging us "prove you wrong" is the cowards way.


If you want instant gratification, get yoruself a free ID on
   http://forums.randi.org/

And post your paper in this forum 

    http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=64

It's effectively an all-9/11 forum these days. It is populated by
people with a wide range of expertise relevant to the 9/11
discussion. It's moderated and polite. You have to be a real a*hole to



You are a coward; 

You won't speak to a fireman

You won't post your paper where real experts will see it. 

You apparently won't contact the producer at this TV show to discuss
your claims.  http://www.hardfire.net/

Post your paper  to   http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=64

The moderators can't prevent you or ban your first post. 

Your truth will be told to the world.  It will get out.  I promise to
post in Usenet groups a link to the thread that developes so everyone
can see the give-and-take on your paper. Let everyone come to their
own conclusions.

What are you afraid of? 

I believe that you know that your "physics paper" is crap and you
don't want it to be seen by anyone but the physics-and-fact-ignorant
people in the "Truth Movement".




----

It's been 6 years. What is taking the Half-Truth Movement so long?


Here is the full-text transcripts from all the firemen, by name.  Tell
us which firemen though there was man-made demolition, the we will see
where he was and what he saw.

    Full text transcripts for those names:

	  http://preview.tinyurl.com/36rak3

   	  http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html/
   		  nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_histories_full_01.html

Here is the easiest wat to search the above.

             
http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=016182179862191393560%3Ahx2yxincxdu



-- 
Meet the Creators of "Loose Change"  
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Zs5jWvu4tR8

Meet the Scholars for 9/11 Truth     
http://youtube.com/watch?v=T6fe9YlHQwA

Ground Zero 911 Conspiracy Wars   by Ray Rivera  http://rayrivera.net
  http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4162315283354424113

The Ground Zeros by Mark Roberts 
  http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5004042232637229146&hl=en

WTC Ground Zero 9/11/2007   Sad. 
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr2LeCXXIjo

Les Jamieson and others of  NY911Truth.org  disparages the FDNY 
  
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/ny911truth.orgmembersdisparagethefdnyatg

How famous Truth Movement people repond  to unfortunate truths that 
show them for what they are 
  
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/semiliterateparanoiacswhofantasizeaboutt

The Naudet Film about 9/11 at WTC 
  http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6371069744838112957&q=Naudet

Marks's collapse video 
  http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2083421624495848233&hl=en

"The 9 - 11 Conspiracies - Fact or Fiction"
  http://www.torrentbox.com/torrent_details?id=125450

Anyone that hasn't seen WTC's Ground Zero in NYC and the "Truth
Movement" kooks that hang out there should look at the first three
videos. The others should be required viewing by anyone that has an
opinion about 9/11 and WTC or has never been to NYC.


-- 
Al Dykes
 News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is
advertising.
    - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail