Talk About Network

Google





Alternative > Conspiracy - New-World-Order > Re: 9/11 may be...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 42 of 65 Topic 6861 of 7709
Post > Topic >>

Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!

by adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Al Dykes) Apr 29, 2008 at 09:36 PM

In article <24781-4817BCA6-113@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Wre Wer <rhyolite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Why wouldnt there be concrete inside the steel? Concrete has compression
>strength and is cheap. Steel flexes so much, the building would sway,

>breaking drywall and glass, without the concrete. The box girder is a


Big buildings sway. Flex is good. Stiff breaks. 

I've been in WTC it in a high wind. I also worked in the Empire State
Building which was built before they knew how to deal with the flex,
and marble interior walls had cracks all over the place.

You may be thinking of the concrete foundation. Above ground WTC was
all-steel with no structural concrete.

If it had structural concrete, it probably wouldn't have collapsed as
it burned.

-- 
Al Dykes
 News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is
advertising.
    - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
 




 65 Posts in Topic:
9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
Reggie <Reggie501@[EMA  2008-04-26 10:43:42 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-26 11:27:01 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"Freedom Fighter&quo  2008-04-26 20:32:31 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"L Alpert" <  2008-04-26 19:08:02 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 00:34:13 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-26 21:10:55 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-04-26 18:56:03 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 03:42:51 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:35:26 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-04-27 09:23:53 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 18:00:11 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 14:43:15 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-04-27 12:40:33 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 22:26:32 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-04-27 20:06:38 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
Major Debacle <Major_D  2008-04-28 03:15:43 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-28 03:30:13 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
Major Debacle <Major_D  2008-04-27 20:33:22 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-28 05:20:10 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 14:39:55 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:30:50 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"L Alpert" <  2008-04-27 09:00:38 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 18:10:07 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 14:41:00 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 14:44:34 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"L Alpert" <  2008-04-27 16:32:58 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"Freedom Fighter&quo  2008-04-28 01:53:55 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-28 02:15:34 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 22:23:18 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 22:21:52 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-28 11:12:28 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"L Alpert" <  2008-04-29 00:12:25 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-29 06:37:21 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
ram03@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 03:12:30 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 10:14:28 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
ram03@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 12:28:52 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 19:22:20 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
ram03@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 12:28:04 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 19:22:31 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 19:43:07 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
rhyolite@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-29 19:26:14 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 21:36:25 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
sanoli@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-29 21:04:43 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 22:31:17 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-30 00:39:55 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-30 06:13:00 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 22:33:23 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 00:30:44 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-26 21:12:26 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:39:39 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 21:09:21 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 01:19:43 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:42:02 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 14:40:51 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-27 22:25:05 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 21:07:29 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:29:16 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
jpsmith123@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-26 17:50:38 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 08:45:30 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
jpsmith123@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-27 16:08:40 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-04-28 00:30:08 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 21:16:12 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 21:23:59 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
agent86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 21:12:03 
Re: 9/11 may be CONSPIRACY! - BBC anchor!!!!
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-27 21:18:20 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 22:26:22 PST 2009.