Why Is Gary Hart So Fearful Of Discussing His =93New World Order=94?
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DRQeNCireJPo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D5r7htckec-U
Former Senator Gary Hart seems to be having difficulties remembering
his last lie because he fouled up again in his latest confrontation
with We Are Change by reversing his assertion that he never used the
term "new world order," contradicting his previous falsehood, but
still seemed fearful of discussing exactly what the term meant.
In the clip, Luke Rudkowski quotes Hart=92s response to 9/11 at a
September 12th Council on Foreign Relations in which he called for the
disaster to be used to "make lemonade out of lemons" and create a "new
world order".
Hart lies by claiming the term was only used to highlight right-wing
hostility to the phrase "new world order" which is completely false as
you will see later and he also contradicts his previous response to
the question in which he claimed to have never used the phrase "new
world order" in his life.
Seemingly wary of the fact that a lot of people know exactly what "new
world order" means now (global government, loss of sovereignty and
individual liberty), Hart is frightened of admitting to using the
phrase and refuses to discuss its meaning.
Hart=92s exact response to We Are Change Colorado=92s assertion that Hart
said shortly after 9/11 the attacks could be used to bring about a
"new world order" was as follows.
"I did not - I=92ve never used that phrase in my life so you=92ve got some
bad information," after which he claimed that George H.W. Bush used
the term only once, despite the fact that Bush used it profusely
during his term in office (here are several examples).
Let=92s go back to September 12th, 2001 and remind ourselves exactly of
what Hart said during a CFR meeting.
"There is a chance for the President of the United States to use this
disaster to carry out what his father, a phrase his father used think
only once and hasn=92t been used since, and that is a "new world order".
The clear context of this quote is Hart expressing his desire to see
the 9/11 attacks used as a pretext to create a "new world order," and
has no relation to the context in which Hart claimed he used the
phrase.
Later in the question and answer session, Hart also initially denies
that he wrote a letter to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
warning of the possibility of a staged false flag event similar to the
Gulf of Tonkin that would be used to justify a military attack, but
later claims it was just a "mock letter".
Hart qualifies the letter by stating it was a warning that the Neo-
Cons could stage an incident to precipitate a bombing campaign.
"What I was tongue-in-cheek saying was that we have an administration
in Wa****ngton that is dying for a reason to bomb Iran and so in a mock
blog letter=85.I just said unless you people wanna be bombed you better
be careful about cross-border incursions and I think I explicitly said
keep the Revolutionary Guard away from the Iraqi border," said Hart.
"I was trying to communicate to the American people what our own
government was trying to plan and that was to find a reason for
bombing Iran - I was simply saying to the American people through this
mock letter - be very careful about this administration creating a
U.S.S. Maine incident or a Gulf of Tonkin incident that would justify
bombing Iran," he concluded.
http://www.infowars.com/?p=3D1824
|
