Intellectual Sludge
D'ya ever feel like you're slogging through chin-deep moral and
intellectual sludge?
I feel like that all the time of late, and the sludge is getting
continuously more rank, deeper and more rank by the day.
It started with moral relativism and PC. There are some things that
are, or are not right, for everyone. Pure air, water and food are
among those in the former category. Strychnine and cyanide are in the
latter category. To say about any of those "it's right for me" or
"it's not right for me" is to pronounce a non sequitur. Those are
universals. The good stuff is good for everyone, in fact essential.
The bad stuff is bad for everyone, in fact lethal. There are moral
equivalents of pure air, water and food, on the one hand, and
strychnine and cyanide on the other.
Now we have junk science. Based on one experiment, often set up in a
most questionable manner, new conclusions are reached about the nature
of physical reality. If money can be made off the new "understanding",
no further experimentation is warranted, and if you want to keep your
job, don't present refuting evidence.
While history has always been fraught with revisionism, there also
always were attempts made by honest scholars to arrive at a view that
was as objective as possible.
Today, it is enough to say that a view of history contradicts what you
knew (which is all called "illusion") and present an alternative take
on the history of human events (called "enlightened reality" or simply
"truth").
We are also told that the real history of the world has been hidden
from us and now, with the advent of the computer (and the concomitant
wisdom and objectivity that it brings, together with access to
heretofore impossible amounts of "data") we are learning the "truth".
Don't ask how it came to be that the truth was uploaded or by whom.
Just assume that the people who uploaded it are wholly well-meaning
"truthers" who offer it for your edification.
The most recent "historical revelatory" film that prompted me to write
this is "Ring of Power: Illuminati Bloodlines".
The odd part about it is the very same people who would understand
that the genealogy is Jesus is contrived (because they have been told
that it's not in to be Christian) are enthusiastically receptive to
the fact that the Rothschild family trace their lineage for thousands
of years, just because they have been told that they Rothschilds
believe this about themselves. First, we don't know if they do believe
this about themselves. We are told that second-hand. Even if they do
believe this about themselves - so what? Their entire existence is all
about delusion and self-delusion. Why participate in what may or may
not be their hallucination about themselves?
For instance: The royal families have been historically referred to as
"blue bloods". What accounts for this? There is a historical reason
for this that you have not been told. The CIA and the Mossad are
keeping it from you. The real reason that the royal families are
called blue bloods is because this planet was colonized hundreds of
thousands of years ago by reptiloids from another dimension whose
blood was based on copper. They mated with the humans on Urth (hey,
the Bible says so! All of a sudden those on the atheism bandwagon
accept something because the Bible says so) and produced a race of
beings who were part reptiloid and part human. They have blue blood.
The mystery is solved.
As to why gold is so im****tant to human society: that little mystery
can be answered by the revelation of the history that is being kept in
CIA and Mossad files too. Luckily for us, a few former intelligence
agents have blown the whistle and are revealing the facts to us that
have been hidden. You see, those reptiles had to have gold as a
nutrient. The gold reserves on their world were depleted. That's why
they had to colonize our planet. It all fits so neatly.
And folks, there are people that are falling for this hype - by the
millions. They are so myriad, in fact, that they constitute enough of
a critical mass to change the way we think about things - and not for
the more analytical or the better.
I am not saying that we have been taught historical truth. History, by
it's very nature, is impossible for any one person to retell
accurately, even with the purest of intentions.
I am saying that that which we are being served up as the more
accurate version of events is nonetheless untrue, and in many cases,
obviously far more off the mark than what we have been told.
D2
|
