Re: Why The Media Will Never Expose The Truth About 911 - They Can't

"Freedom Fighter" <liberty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:FcMfk.123396$102.1890@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
> message news:Xns9ADE6A770BFriemann1850yahoocom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Once you start talking about 911, esp Building 7, it becomes obvious
that
>> the media was in on the cover-up right from the start.  And they can 
>> never
>> concede that.
>
> No doubt there are some individual re****ters and writers that know or at

> least suspect the truth - but they face the loss of their jobs and even 
> blacklisting should they say anything. The media, as with all big 
> corpserations, have fallen under the control of the mass-murdering 
> fascists that deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, if not perpetrated
it. 
> What we need is an "undergound" free press. Such media played a big role

> in late 1960s politics and the ending of the Vietnam war.

Can either of you explain why *none* of the shareholders of the insurance 
companies - ordinary people whose pensions and incomes have been damaged
by 
the insurers having to pay massive settlements - haven't shown up at the 
AGMs and demanded that the insurers recover the payouts from those you say

are responsible?

Your premise is that journalists don't speak up because they'll suffer 
financially.   Well, these people are ALREADY suffering financially, there

are thousands and thousands of them, and NONE are speaking up at AGMs and 
demanding their money be recovered.

Remember that insurers conduct their own investigations, and aren't bound
by 
the same rules government agencies are.

If you can't convincingly explain why this is the case, your "intimidation

of media" argument is meaningless, in fact it's disproved.

Shall I wait?

-pk