Re: Why The Media Will Never Expose The Truth About 911 - They Can't

"Disneygeek" <edrhodes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:f0f59b15-cb41-4d22-82cc-6ffe382c5db6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Jul 17, 7:56 pm, ady...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Al Dykes) wrote:
> In article <Xns9ADE6A770BFriemann1850yahoo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >Once you start talking about 911, esp Building 7, it becomes obvious
that
> >the media was in on the cover-up right from the start. And they can
never
> >concede that.
>
> Huh?
>
> "The Media" was re****ting, all afternoon, that WTC7 was on fire and
> about to collapse. I saw this TV re****t at about 4:30 PM on 9/11.
> WTC7 collapsed at 5:30. This matwerial is in the archives.

That's their point. The media was in on it and lying about the
building's condition so when the invisable, silent explosives brought
the building down, they could claim it was in the process of happening
for hours.

Scary, isn't it?






What's really scary, is you believing less then two weeks is enough time
to plant explosives in three very large buildings, to take them down.
Hell, just one building would take at least one month to just place the
explosives
into. If it wouldn't take even longer.
It takes quite a bit of time to plan, plant explosives, and take down a
much
smaller building.
In a window of a week and a half?
They guessed WTC7 was on fire soon after the second building was hit.
At this point, the entire WTC complex had been evacuated, no one would've
known WTC7 was on fire, because WTC1 and WTC2 were center of
attention. The thing was burning out of control for around four hours,
till
someone
noticed. That was at about 2PM. And from what I'm reading, the news seems
to be the first people who took notice.
See also Popular Mechanics Magazine.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
How bout we take a 707 Plane, and place it on your car?
It's a much smaller plane, but it would smash your car.
The only big difference is, those floors were made to take on quite a bit
more
weight then your car. And would've stayed together if a 707 hit the
buildings.
However, they got hit with 757's, which weigh quite a bit more....

Weight each floor could withstand, about 1300 Tons.
They got hit with in-between 1500 to 2000 Tons.
Why did the second building go first?
Maybe the fact that the core of each tower was empty?
It would mean, that because the plane hit more directly, a lot of it fell
down the center of the core. It was still too much weight for the building
to withstand, but it took longer before the weight of the plane took out
the floor, where the heaviest of the planes parts would've been. When that
entire
floor fell on top of the one below it, total wait would've been over 1600
Tons.
Almost double when you go down four floors. As the weight built up, the
floors
fell faster and faster. The normal law of gravity does not apply, when
weight
keeps rising. Actuall, gravity is what took them down.
So I guess you could blame it on our gravitational pull. (LOL)
What I mean by that is, drop a car and a stone from two stories up,
they'll both land at the same time.

Coming to think about it, the buildings falling at near freefall speed,
seems
totally logical,,.

Now, people that believe the CT's, here's your chance.

Fievel.