Re: Why The Media Will Never Expose The Truth About 911 - They Can't

In article <ffKdnSzhQpkX2R_VnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, 
dlwstrausser@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
> "zasochimti" <zasochimti@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:g5teg4$s48$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "Fievel J Mousekewitz" <dlwstrausser@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:EsudnQjNWpSlhB_VnZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > "Iarnrod" <iarnrod@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > >
news:807a5521-f824-4204-aef8-e48a18ba2c6e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > On Jul 19, 5:10 am, "sack-o-****i" <sack-o-****...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> They put them there loooong before 9/11, dumbass.
> > >
> > > BWAHAHAAAHHAHAAAAAA!!!!! "They" put "them" "there" long ago! Holy
> > > crap, you are insane. Are you mental?
> >
> > Nope.
> >
> > > There were NO explosives going off in ANY of the buildings, yet
"they"
> > > put "them" "there!!" BWAHAHAAAHAAHAHHAAAAAA!!!
> >
> > Care to provide scientific evidence for you claims, "Fievel"?
> >
> > > You are a kook of the highest order.
> >
> > Unless you provide everyone here with scientific evidence which shows,
> > beyond a shadow of a doubt, that there weren't any explosives in any
of
> > the WTC buildings - you're the kook around here, "Fievel".
> >
> > No matter how much you "BWAHAHAHA".
> >
> > Capisci?
> >
> > Of course you do.
> >
> > >> And beware. God only knows where they've put some more.
> > >
> > > Boogie boogie boogie!!!!
> > >
> > > Jeezuz Aych Kee-rist, they sure make some stupid people over there
in
> > > your ****hole country, sack-o
> >
> > Still, we were here loooooong before (like 500 years) you were even a
> sperm
> > in the left nutsack of a brit, "american".
> >
> > >
> > > Kook on, dude!
> > > You think this might help?
> > > Or do you think these people are still going to tell us we're wrong?
> >
> > YOU are definitely wrong. And not only that. You're deliberately
lying.
> > But, I understand you.
> >
> > You're not lying for Bush. You're lying for the elites.
> >
> > > What ever?!?!
> > > http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html
> > > The cores had nothing in them, that's the true reason the 2nd
building
> went
> > > first.
> > > It is still possible that some sort of explosive made it down to the
> lower
> > > floors,
> > > since there was nothing in each core.
> > > As I said before, it was a weight thing, the floors couldn't handle
that
> > > much strain,
> > > and collapsed on one another.
> >
> > Care to explain how come the upper ****tion of WTC2 tilted, and then
went
> > down the path of most resistance, "Fievel"?
> >
> > Also, do you have any scientific evidence that would prove, once and
for
> all,
> > that there weren't any explosive devices planted in any of the WTC
> buildings?
> >
> > Go!
> >
> >
> >
> Putting other peoples words in my mouth?
> You CT people are worse then I was.
> You've repied to things I've not said.
> Then accused me of saying them.
> That's even more stupid then I.
> 
> Fievel.
> 
> 
> 


Sack, and several of the other kookers have a hard time keeping posts 
and who made them straight. He's not the worst at it though, he's kind 
of so so, like he is on the kooktard ladder. Not the craziest, not the 
funniest either. But he's still pretty funny.
-- 
BDK

kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
****llmaster