Re: Why The Media Will Never Expose The Truth About 911 - They Can't

On Jul 20, 10:28 am, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are SMARTER THAN ME"
<xeton2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Disneygeek <edrho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
innews:1e3f8153-e5c8-46f2-9cc6-82=
fba1c98d86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Yes I do. "Explosive waves" give off NOISE! "Tiny" explosives wouldn't
> > have been able to do the damage necessary to force a collapse.
> > Furthermore, the explosives that CAUSE the collapse have to go off
> > BEFORE the collapse, not during it!
>
> Lots of people heard explosives, you idiot.

Bzzzztttt!! Wrong, lots of people heard loud noises they compared with
*explosions* and this does not create mythical *explosives.*

The fact is that there were no controlled demolitions explosives at
all, anywhere. None went off, therefore there were none contributing
to the blast.

>
BTW - have you explained the collapse of Building 7 yet?.

Well, uh, yeah. We=92ve been telling you about it for a couple of years
now. Don=92t you read the replies? There=92s no mystery to WTC7. everyone
on the scene knew it was going to collapse from the immense structural
damage it suffered in the WTC1 collapse and the raging fires that
eventually engulfed it. The word went out five hours earlier that it
would fall because a wall was seen to be bulging. This building was
doomed. Why would anyone blow up a building that already had been
declared unstable, on fire, and structurally damaged? You are a
kooker.

> The govt can't and they've been trying for 7 years.

The govt can and has, and NIST is simply preparing the full re****t on
the mechanics of the collapse. What caused it is not in question. Your
sanity, however, is.