Re: Here's a good way to settle the "mooon landing hoax" controversey

In article <3b04b0a7-2ede-489c-9fb3-
e461f561064f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, wsthomas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jul 18, 11:32=A0am, twentydollar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be easier to just send a small, unmanned probe up there
> > and have it send back pictures of the flag?
>=20
> If it were a government funded probe, the kooks would yell that THAT
> was part of the conspiracy, and the picture was actually of a flag on
> the grassy knoll in a warehouse in Area 51.
>
> If it were privately funded, and a flag was found and photographed,
> the kooks would say that the private entity that sent it was paid off
> by the government and the picture was actually of a flag taken in the
> hanger where they killed all the people of the airliners that weren't
> flown into the WTC towers.

you're not getting it.
That there would be a flag up there wouldnt prove that it was planted
by=20
the apollo missions or by humans altogether.
=20
> If someone were to personally fly one of these kooks to the moon to
> show him the flag and the remains of the Apollo Lander, he'd
> imediately take off his space helmet because it's impossible to go the
> the moon and he'd show them (actually, that's the best outcome).
>=20
> Basically, they're ****ing nuts.

of course.
people who doubt the official version MUST be nuts for the cattle's=20
peace of mind.


> Yol Bolsun,
> Grendel.
>=20
> "I'm not cynical, just experienced."
>=20
>=20

--=20
NEVER TRY TO TEACH A PIG TO SING....IT WASTES YOUR TIME AND ANNOYS THE=20
PIG