On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:52:21 -0400, "Fievel J Mousekewitz"
<dlwstrausser@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>"Government ****ll #2" <gov.****ll@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:oo9c84lltv101uv22a2ib6scpukt8aj5ie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:27:57 -0400, "Fievel J Mousekewitz"
>> <dlwstrausser@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >"Government ****ll #2" <gov.****ll@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >news:ka9c84580ifve7aifk82gqou6llugto532@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:20:03 -0400, "Fievel J Mousekewitz"
>> >> <dlwstrausser@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >"Government ****ll #2" <gov.****ll@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> >news:gj7c84h2r2hp0tfggjhj42boe5ojb1jecb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:48:52 -0400, "Fievel J Mousekewitz"
>> >> >> <dlwstrausser@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >"BDK" <****llkill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> >> >news:MPG.22ec5d10fa122263989952@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >> In article <UPKdna-cVs5l2x_VnZ2dnUVZ_tPinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >> >> >> dlwstrausser@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>> >> >> >> > "BDK" <****llkill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> >> >> > news:MPG.22eb4caca1a1c7e9989934@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >> > > In article <bZadnRYcPN5vuBzVnZ2dnUVZ_ozinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >> >> >> > > dlwstrausser@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>> >> >> >> > > > "BDK" <****llkill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> >> >> > > >
news:MPG.22df60e2af069bb198986a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >> > > > > In article
>> ><Xns9AD67F03DB271riemann1850yahoocom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >> >> >> > xeton2001
>> >> >> >> > > > > @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>> >> >> >> > > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >>
>>http://www.prisonplanet.com/about-this-bbc-hit-piece-story-about-wtc-7-
>> >> >> >> > > > > > there-is-a-huge-contradiction-here.html
>> >> >> >> > > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > > Infowar Wednesday, July 9, 2008
>> >> >> >> > > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > > There are BIG mistakes everywhere in this story.
>Probably
>> >the
>> >> >> >> > biggest
>> >> >> >> > > > > > mistake
>> >> >> >> > > > > > is the way the do***entary argued that the NYFD
>> >firefighters
>> >> >> >could
>> >> >> >> > not
>> >> >> >> > > > > > fight the fires in
>> >> >> >> > > > > > the burning WTC 7 because the collapse of the Twin
>Towers
>> >> >> >damaged
>> >> >> >> > water
>> >> >> >> > > > > > lines,
>> >> >> >> > > > > > and the do***entary even stated that THERE WAS NO
WATER
>to
>> >> >put
>> >> >> >out
>> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> > > > WTC
>> >> >> >> > > > > > 7
>> >> >> >> > > > > > fires!!!
>> >> >> >> > > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > > But then they argued that Larry Silverstein=3Fs
>comment:
>> >=3F
>> >> >> >They
>> >> >> >> > > > decided to
>> >> >> >> > > > > > pull it =3F was
>> >> >> >> > > > > > referring to =3Fpulling out firefighting
>operations=3F=3F.
>> >> >but
>> >> >> >there
>> >> >> >> > > > were no
>> >> >> >> > > > > > firefighting operations
>> >> >> >> > > > > > going on in WTC 7, because they previously said that
>THERE
>> >> >WAS
>> >> >> >NO
>> >> >> >> > WATER
>> >> >> >> > > > !!!
>> >> >> >> > > > > > Even the firefighters said that they were not
allowed
>to
>> >> >enter
>> >> >> >WTC 7
>> >> >> >> > =3F
>> >> >> >> > > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > > They cannot have it both ways=3F was there a
>firefighting
>> >> >> >operation
>> >> >> >> > in
>> >> >> >> > > > WTC 7,
>> >> >> >> > > > > > or not,
>> >> >> >> > > > > > because they said there was no water, since the
water
>> >lines
>> >> >were
>> >> >> >> > > > supposedly
>> >> >> >> > > > > > damaged.
>> >> >> >> > > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > You must be drunk...There were firefighters outside
the
>> >> >building.
>> >> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > The building was going to come down!
>> >> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > Understand now?
>> >> >> >> > > > Keep trying, they won't get it.
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > I know, but it's fun playing with them. My one dog has 100
>times
>> >> >the
>> >> >> >> > > sense a kooktard does and she isn't too smart, even for a
>dog.
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > Sounds like the dog we had about 15 years ago. She was
pretty
>> >stupid,
>> >> >> >> > but her heart was almost gold.
>> >> >> >> > One of the kindest hearts considering the odd mix of smaller
>dogs.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > The wtc? Weights, that's it, & that's all. They still won't
get
>> >it.
>> >> >> >> > Did you see, one of them has actually replied to something I
>> >didn't
>> >> >say,
>> >> >> >> > then
>> >> >> >> > said I did.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > LOL....
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Fievel.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> They do all kinds of kooky ****, all the time, and when it
gets
>> >pointed
>> >> >> >> out to them, they switch tracks, like the little choo-choo toy
or
>> >car
>> >> >> >> that bumps into something, and then changes direction and
bumps
>into
>> >> >> >> something else, again and again. Some of them can't seem to
use a
>> >> >> >> newsreader that works worth a ****, so Outlook Express it is.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Then there is the "Wheel of Kooktardery", where they make a
>claim,
>> >it
>> >> >> >> gets shot down, they spin the wheel, spout another whacky
claim,
>> >then
>> >> >> >> repeat, over and over again, almost seven years now. The same
>> >nonsense
>> >> >> >> gets posted again and again, and they seem to forget about the
>last
>> >> >time
>> >> >> >> the same claim was made. Makes for some funny ****, but
>sometimes,
>> >if
>> >> >> >> the wheel lands on a recent claim, it's just annoying.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> BDK
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> kOOk Magnet!
>> >> >> >> NJJ CLUB #1
>> >> >> >> ****llmaster
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >It's still entertaining to read, unless I've read it too many
>times.
>> >> >> >Then I try to only pay attention to the rants, raving, and name
>> >calling.
>> >> >> >It's funny.
>> >> >> >TY for the reminder, I like Thunderbird better then outlook
>express...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Try Agent.
>> >> >> http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
>> >> >I'm going to cry now, cause my news server only lets me on
>> >> >less then half of the binary groups,,,, .. OK, don'e crying..
>> >> >
>> >> >Fievel.
>> >>
>> >> Forte have a news server too:
>> >> http://www.forteinc.com/apn/index.php
>> >
>> >BTW, which side are you on, the side that believes the CT's
>> >or the other side?
>> >
>> >Fievel.
>>
>> I'm a ****ll. For *the* government. Have been since 1996. Risen through
the
>> ranks from ****ll #312 to #2. I run the pay section at ****ll Central.
>I'm guessing that means you're against the ct's then...
I'm *for* reality.
>:-)
>Cool.
>
>Fievel.
--
****ll #2
I believe in evidence. I believe in observation, measurement, and
reasoning, confirmed by independent observers. I'll believe anything, no
matter how wild and ridiculous, if there is evidence for it. The wilder
and
more ridiculous something is, however, the firmer and more solid the
evidence will have to be.
Isaac Asimov - The Roving Mind (1983)
|
