"B. B." <bern.boergeenreclame@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:47b71fc6$0$25475$9a622dc7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Monday Fayed will testify.
I'll be amazed if he doesn't.
>Let's hope he will not run away before Monday.
It's Lecompte, Pepin & co who have run away. They've refused to testify!
> He could claim that the Coroner is biased or he could come with another
> lame excuse.
What is Lecompte's lame excuse?
> If he'll testify the international press will have a field day. All
> Fayed's accusations will be addressed and he will be asked to back them
> up. Since the only evidence he can provide is his own vivid imagination,
> his "opponent's" lawyers will have a field day too. They'll grill him,
at
> least that is what they should do.
The only "evidence" the french have provided to show Henri Paul was drunk,
is blood samples taken by Lecompte (who has refused to testify) analyzed
by
Pepin (who has also refused to testify) and which has now been thouroughly
discredited at the inquest.
i.e. bottles were wrongly labeled, the chain of evidence was broken, the
carbon monoxide is "biologically inexplicable...a mystery", the sample
used
for DNA testing was not also tested for alcohol and carbon monoxide, 2
blood
samples photographed with Henri Paul's body showing his chest had not been
opened were said to have come from the hemothorax, a photo of HP taken by
french police officer on the 5th Sept shows no incisions to the scarpa
triangle from which blood samples were supposed to have been taken, again
by
Lecompte, this time in front of Judge Stepan, on the 4th Sept, and these
samples were then taken away by Pepin in his Twingo to be analysed,
commander Mules destroyed his notes, etc etc etc.
There is not a single expert witness in court who can explain the carbon
monoxide - not one!
There is not a shred of credible or reliable evidence to show that HP was
drunk, or that it was his blood, or that the blood samples had not been
mixed with.the blood of somebody else.
The only evidence of HP drinking at all is the bar bills showing he had
ordered two 50 mil measures of Ricard.
Forrest, when asked how many Ricards would HP have had to drink to achieve
an alchohol reading of 175 mil per 100 mil of blood, ASSUMING, he had been
drinking since he went off duty at 7pm, said eight 50 mil measures in all.
(i.e. 8 including the 2 he had in the bar at the Ritz).
Eight 50 mil measures of Ricard @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
45% alchohol = 180 mil of alchohol
consumed.
Thats the same amount of alcohol in 6.3 pints of 5% lager.
Imagine drinking 6 pints and appearing sober to everyone at the hotel,
tying
your shoe laces, no slurred speech, no smell of booze on your breath to
people including Trevor Rees and Kieran Wingfield etc etc.
It's just bollocks isn't it?
>Fayed's case is not looking good at all.
Really? Apart from the above, how about the Mishcon note that the police
sat
on for 6 years, the Squidgy Tapes wich were tapped from Sandringham and
broadcast for weeks, the powerful motorbike in the tunnel, the flash of
light etc.
> Levistre told a story that cannot be true,
Please explain.
> Repossi invented story after story,
What did he invent?
> Tomlinson (who got the money he wanted from Fayed)
What money? How much?
> slithered away
He is not a snail is he?
> and McNamara admitted he lied on several occasions.
I can only remember one. He lied about the 2 Ricards in a US(?) tv
interview.
> Especially McNamara's cross-examination was a good read, in my opinion.
He
> had to admit that he, Chief Security of Fayed's Dubious Empire, just
> repeated what his master told him.
Where does he "admit" this?
> He didn't check anything Fayed said,
How do you know?
> he just swallowed it line, hook and sinker. Some former cop! "Money
talks"
> used "banana", this NG's main conspiracy theorist and main abuser of
> people with common sense, to say and in this case he was right.
Hopefully
> the day will come when the public gets to know how much Fayed paid to
how
> many to keep his fantasies alive.
>
> Banana read the Paget Re****t, understood that he had been wrong all the
> time, and ran away. I doubt whether any of the other conspiracy
theorists
> actually read the Paget Re****t, but they followed their Leader's
example.
> They left Mad Al behind, but he lives in other space, so that doesn't
> matter. I presume they have changed their Usenet Identity and are
> constructing new conspiracy on other boards. Sad, isn't it?
>
> B. B.
>
|
