Grossly negligent driving and the paps were recklessly "racing" the
Mercedes
and drove so close to it that Mr Paul had no freedom to move.
Took four days of deliberation in a case that took 93 days.
How many of those days dealt with the Road Traffic Accident re****t?
So it is a fact that the paps were harassing the car - thought they were
no
where near it at the material time. But then if they were so close to it,
which seems to indicate they were trying to influence the drive in some
way
how come the car has the freedom to crash as it is alleged to have done
without taking a few paps, on motorcycles along with it?
And what was the big deal anyway? What was the big shot they were all
after - the couple sitting in a 280 - doing what, looking out the window?
The 280 had clear windows - just the job if you want the paps to follow
it.
Was the car pulled away from the pillar and turned around to face the way
it
came before it was photographed. Straps are seen laying underneath it
ready
to be lifted up onto a flatbed truck so the well known "damage" picture
may
have been taken a while after the time of the accident. Was there a spin
at
all? Computer simulations depict a bounce and a spin off but well, that
can't be considered conclusive as to what happened. So was it pulled away
from the pillar before the photographs were taken? If so why?
