----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron" <ron_winn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.princess-diana
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:33 PM
Subject: Loose ends. [in your head!]
> So Trevor did have a seat belt. Or did he? Has it been decided he was
> wearing his seat belt to have survived that collision? Just look at the
> damage to that car. Would he have come out of it alive had he not been
> wearing his seat belt? I think it was decided he had to be wearing it
> despite it being contrary to bodyguard practice of not being free &
> unrestricted in movement in town driving.
Did you pay any attention the last ten years? No one wore a seat-belt.
> I recall Geoff Cromwell was
> adamant he was not wearing a seat belt. I think Geoff was right to
contest
> it. How long had they been away from the city?
Again, did you pay any attention the last ten years? They were inside the
city. Where did the crash happened according to you? Normandy?
>It was only minutes inside
> the tunnel so when did Trevor get this urge to put on his seat belt? I
> don't
> think the cir***stances were such that required a seat belt and if those
> cir***stances arose after entering the tunnel then there was not the
time
> to
> find it, extend it or anchor it.
No one wore a seat-belt.
> But let's face it there wasn't going to be a finding that PP or MI6 or
> anyone else of the ilk did it. Not when it was a matter of National
> Security
> and/or the bringing down of the British Empire.
Did you pay any attention the last days? Even Fayed's lawyers gave up any
conspiracy theories because they couldn't produce a shred of evidence to
back them up.
> The scandal of a drunk
> driver and all the other little scandals [no seat belts - paps
harrassment
> of the car - speeding etc] in comparison to what these major scandals
> would
> mean, well it wasn't never to be. Still think it was a shaped charge
> inside
> the car that created the "collision" damage.
Based on what? Fayed's lawyers presented exactly nothing to sup****t their
boss's wild conspiracy theories.
>That would account for Trevor
> surviving the "impact" and account for the ease with which he can
maintain
> amnesia free of conscience. Did Diana's pulmonary vein tear [a
> decelaration
> injury] and yet Trevor survive any such injury? Why did Diana survive
the
> crash and Dodi didn't?
Again, did you pay any attention the last ten years? Henri Paul and Dodi
Fayed died at once, Princess Diana died later, but she died because she
was
badly injured in the same car crash. I know that conspiracy theorists tend
to ask leading questions that are based on assumptions. Usually they start
talking about something else when the facts turn out be not in accordance
with their assumptions. You keep presenting your debunked assumptions as
facts which is, I have to say, rather silly.
B. B.
|
