Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Conspiracy - Right Wing > US 'Invasion' o...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 461 of 539
Post > Topic >>

US 'Invasion' of Korea

by "King Of Atlantis" <poop@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 9, 2006 at 01:42 AM

For fair use, you may publish and/or forward this article.

      US 'Invasion' of Korea
      by Catherine Lutz

      As world attention is drawn to North Korea's missile launches and 
nuclear program, many South Koreans are attuned to a threat much closer to

home. They have watched a group of rice farmers in the small village of 
Daechuri near the city of Pyongtaek attempt to defend themselves against 
invasion by the US military. The farmers' struggle against expansion of a 
nearby US military base has become a rallying point for Koreans who see 
their country being further militarized and their security and chances for

reunification put at risk.

      In May, South Korean police and soldiers descended on a schoolhouse 
where rice farmers and their sup****ters were resisting eviction. The
police 
bloodied heads, destroyed the school, and backhoed rice fields and 
irrigation systems to prevent spring planting. They were sent by the
Korean 
Ministry of Defense, at the behest of the US government, to claim a large 
swath of land to expand Camp Humphrey . Already covering 2 square miles,
the 
base is slated to swallow an additional 2,851 acres.

      Part of a grand plan of global military base restructuring announced

by US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in 2003, the Pyongtaek base is
meant 
to take in soldiers and equipment from closing military installations near

the de militarized zone and in Seoul. However, the bases' relocation to 
Pyongtaek is part of a plan to use the bases to strike at will anywhere in

Asia and to contain China. It is this ``expeditionary" or aggressive role
of 
the bases that is behind concurrent US negotiations with South Korea, 
seeking ``strategic flexibility" to use the forces based there throughout 
Asia. Such an agreement would change the original defensive purpose of the

base. So it concerns people across the region, who see remilitarization, 
arms races, and intensified danger where the United States simply claims 
realignment. Recent US and allied military exercises off Guam, itself 
targeted for a massive US military buildup, were of unprecedented size,
and 
North Korea's missile launch might be seen as a response to that 
provocation.

      While the arguments for this restructuring suggest the United States

and Korea are mutual and equal allies, Korea in fact remains a semi 
sovereign state under US control in many respects. Most strikingly, Korean

troops come under the command of an American officer in wartime. US
military 
plans in Asia, then, necessarily implicate the Koreans and draw them into 
conflict with their neighbors. Imagining China as the new national enemy
is 
a process well underway in Wa****ngton, and the Koreans know all too well 
that their surgical twinning to US strategic plans will make them China's 
enemy as well.

      All of this is playing out within the context of a difficult 
relation****p between the more than 30,000 US soldiers based around Korea
and 
the local citizens who see them as a source of prostitution, crime, and 
pollution. Koreans can point to two young girls crushed by US tanks in
2002, 
multiple rapes and rape-murders of Korean women, and a recent leaked
re****t 
showing stratospheric levels of soil and water contamination at closing US

bases.

      In Daechuri, the farmers have been holding a candlelight vigil every

night for the last two years in a Quonset hut on the school grounds, under

the thunderous thut-thut-thut of US helicopters passing in and out of Camp

Humphrey . Sup****ters have come in from around the country by the
thousands, 
members of groups from across a wide range of Korea's civil society, still

vibrant with an enthusiasm for the democracy they achieved only in 1987 
after years of brutal dictator****p (armed and sup****ted by the United 
States). While a majority of Koreans want to see the US military leave, 
powerful business interests, conservative Christians, and an older 
generation convinced of the value of the US presence continue to sup****t 
Wa****ngton's military plans and Korean annual payments of at least $625 
million toward their execution.

      The justification for the US military buildup across Asia is the 
advance of political and economic freedom. The residents of Daechuri might

be forgiven for being suspicious of such claims. Some of the village's 
oldest residents with whom I spoke last fall remember the Japanese
evicting 
their parents for a military base during Korea's pre war annexation. The
US 
Army took over and expanded the base in World War II, and now, for some, 
their third eviction in the name of a misconstrued vision of military
rather 
than human security is imminent.

      Halting the eviction of Daechuri's farmers would be a good first
step 
toward demilitarizing the peninsula and the region. Their homes are being 
destroyed in the name of America 's citizens, and we have more power than 
anyone to reverse the escalating rhetoric and reality of arms in Asia by 
calling on the US government to halt its regarrisoning of Korea, Guam, and

Asia-Pacific region.

      Catherine Lutz, a professor of anthropology at Brown University and 
its Watson Institute for International Studies, is the author of 
``Homefront: A Military City and the American 20th Century."

      ©2006 Boston Globe

      ###
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
US 'Invasion' of Korea
"King Of Atlantis&qu  2006-10-09 01:42:29 
Re: US 'Invasion' of Korea
Ian MacLure <ibm@[EMAI  2006-10-08 21:59:21 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 0:06:58 CDT 2008.