Re: Best republican Lie Yet

sleeper <moc.sseldnim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Foxtrot <foxtrot@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> waxed rhapsodic 
>> sleeper <moc.sseldnim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>rather than the party that describes cornholing their children in
public 
>>>office as an alternative lifestyle?
>> 
>> Cite. 
>
>how about that ann coulter guy?
>
>http://newsbusters.org/node/8173
>
>Wilson:  Alright, so Ann, a lot of people look at this and say this could

>change the dynamic of the elections. What say you?
>
>Coulter:  Um, not, not, no. Certainly not this one person. I don’t think 
>the Republicans did anything wrong. You had one gay guy sending 
>inappropriate instant messages. As far as we know now there wasn’t any 
>inappropriate touching, and Foley adamantly denies it. Pretty minor
scandal 
>compared to the Democrat *** scandals. Oh, maybe we could have a
bipartisan 
>commission with, with Clinton heading it to investigate this. But, um,
what 
>I do think is striking about it since it’s such a scandalette that’s 
>sweeping the nation is it shows the Democrats don’t want to talk about 
>national security. That wasn’t going well for them. But, um, now they can

>engage in wild, over the top gay ba****ng for the next few weeks. 
>
>she keeps referring to him as a "gay guy," instead of what he is: a 
>pedophile.

That's your proof that the entire Republican party condones *** 
with minors?!? LOL