On Nov 3, 11:36 pm, alm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Almond) wrote:
> In article <1UaXi.944$Cb.20@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)"
<fin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >"Robert Cohen" <robtco...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>
> >> As for the Rothschild's etal: I have not yet read the WIIKIPEDIA
take;
>
> >The public would be better off banning WikiPedia. Any publicly
editable
> >data base is not to be trusted.
> > "Wikipedia isn't supposed to be the same thing as an encyclopedia:
it's
> > an experiment to see if accuracy can be arrived at through
consensus."
> >.... And it isn't working very well.
> >http://www.aetherometry.com/antiwikipedia/Section_I.html
> >Because of the massive number of lawsuits against Wikipedia, an
enormous
> >number of pages have been forced to carry the heading, "This page is
currently
> >under dispute over it's content accuracy". "This Article or section
may
> > require
> >cleanup", and other disclaimers. It's becoming a real sore on every
teacher's
> >ass in the country for a few years now - that being a publicly editable
> > database,
> >Wikipedia is subject to containing completely falsified or highly
biased and/or
> >misleading information.
>
> Correct. And you can not find some of the most outstanding material
> by the people of highest caliber unless it aligns with this NWO
> agenda.
>
> Wikipedia is a global project to collect massive amounts of information
> on individuals and their views so that they could be "taken care of"
> need be.
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://courseblog.cs.princeton.edu/spring06/wws528f/?p=68
> >The problem is so blatant, that various Wikipedia foreign sites are
being shut
> >down by the respective governments to prevent the imparting of
fraudulent
> >information to the public.
>
> >http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060119-6013.html
>
>
>http://www.israelnewsagency.com/wikipedianewsisraelcensor****p48480706...
>
> >The big problem, is that students (and other inquisitive minds) are
also
> >generally too lazy to find a library or other printed reference
materials as
> >sources, so they sit behind their computers and take the easy way
out...
> >believing that what they read in 'the 'pedia' is the truth. In the US,
a great
> >number of teachers are currently refusing to accept Wiki as a reference
> >on research papers. It's a known issue that it contains false
information
> >as a result of being publicly editable.
>
> >It's so easy to commit fraud on Wikipedia, that it's often the brunt of
> >practical jokes...
>
>http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?ch=infotech&sc=&id=...
> ><same
story>http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/roush/posts.aspx?id=15974
> >Wkipedia proponents like to use the total number of "errors" or average
> >"accuracy" in relation to other sources like Britannica... but they
aren't
> >staying aligned with the truth by admitting that we aren't talking
about
> >spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors here... we're talking
about
> >complete fraud.
>
> >http://emacsmood.livejournal.com/101766.html
>
> >http://writ.news.findlaw.com/ramasastry/20051212.html
>
> >http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1900708,00.asp
> >http://www.pressaction.com/news/weblog/print/brandt01212006/
> >Saturday, January 21, 2006
>
> > "There is a problem with the structure of Wikipedia. The basic
> > problem is that no one, neither the Trustees of Wikimedia
> > Foundation, nor the volunteers who are connected with Wikipedia,
> > consider themselves responsible for the content. If you don't
believe
> > me, then carefully read Wikipedia's disclaimer."
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:General_disclaimer
> >Want a sample of this crappola that people could actually, though
> >unintentionally, buy into without checking other sources?
>
> >June 02, 2006
>
>http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060602/BUSINESS/...
> >/1003/rss03
>
> > " Popular Wikipedia entries, such as on President Bush, are
> > continually vandalized. An entry on Wikipedia founder Jimmy
> > Wales once was falsified with a reference that had him being
> > shot dead.
>
> > In 2005, oil giant ExxonMobil's entry was altered by a disgruntled
> > Internet user who changed the cor****ate slogan to "Robbing you
> > blind" and the name of the company chairman to "J.R. Ewing."
>
> >This (Wikipedia) will never be a reliable source until someone takes
> >responsibility for it's accuracy.
> >http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1900708,00.asp
>
> It isn't a source of anything. I visited it for a couple of time
> and simply could not believe my eyes. Looks like some propaganda
> machine of global pro****tions.
>
> Utterly useless.
>
> --
> The most powerful Usenet tool you have ever heard of.
> NewsMaestro v. 4.0.6 - Dictionary Update/Expert Mode has been released.
>
> * Significant improvement in symbol substitution mechanism
> for verb tense and plurals.
> * Expert mode.
> * Miscellaneous improvements and bug fixes.
> * Templates generator improvements.
> * Multi-job sup****t.
>
> Note: In some previous releases some class files were missing.
> As a result, the program would not run.
> Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
> Web page:http://newsmaestro.sourceforge.net/
>
> Download
page:http://newsmaestro.sourceforge.net/Download_Information.htm
>
> Send any feedback, ideas, suggestions, test results to
> newsmaestroinfo \at/ mail.ru.
>
> Your personal info will not be released and your privacy
> will be honored.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
After we're too old or dead, i hereaby predict & hope Wikipedia, as
constantly corrected/reformed/revised, will be flouri****ng, and
despite lawsuits and f-ups.
Competitors and copycats with better mice catchers are welcome,
available space is seemingly infinite.
|
