"Almond" <almond@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message...
> "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >This (Wikipedia) will never be a reliable source until someone takes
> >responsibility for it's accuracy.
> >
> >http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1900708,00.asp
> It isn't a source of anything. I visited it for a couple of time
> and simply could not believe my eyes. Looks like some propaganda
> machine of global pro****tions.
It is when it comes to "sensitive" subject matter... like 9/11, global
warming, the phony War On Terror, the Zionist issue, etc., etc..
> Utterly useless.
You can find information... the problem is, you have to both 'source'
it and triple check it.
|
