On Nov 4, 12:06 am, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <fin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> "Robert Cohen" <robtco...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > Competitors and copycats with better mice catchers are welcome,
> > available space is seemingly infinite.
>
> Encyclop=E6dia Britannica will do quite nicely, and shelf space
> hasn't reached a premium quite yet. ;-)
>
> http://www.britannica.com/
Of course, on-line, you have to
> sign up and log in, so they can see what you're searching for
> as well.
They do not get a fee nor a prospect they can call-on from free
registration?
If so, then I'll be trying 'em too.
Hope it's written more in 6th grade newspaper level lingo, rather than
the expected esoteric boring academic language that is a turn-off
particularly to my 50-60-70 percentile mind.
The articles in hard copy BRITTANICA were usually credited-signed,
which is seemingly preferable to anonimity, and thus implies
professional responsibility.
So, Hooray for us and to them adapting.
I can't mind ads should they hawk 'em, so long as the damne ads do not
interfere/influence content.


|