"Topaz" <mars1933@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:5j7p24lf89lev4ec65uev5v9p2g2vcmmnu@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Here are some quotes from "The Shadow of Zog" by Israel Shamir:
>
> Jeff Blankfort writes, "Ardently pro-Israel American Jews are in
> positions of unprecedented influence within the United States and have
> assumed or been given decision making positions over virtually every
> segment of our culture and body politic". And he quotes Benjamin
> Ginsberg's "The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State":
>
> "Jews played a central role in American finance during the 1980s, and
> they were among the chief beneficiaries of that decade's cor****ate
> mergers and reorganizations. Today, though barely 2 % of the nation's
> population is Jewish, close to half its billionaires are Jews. The
> chief executive officers of the three major television networks and
> the four largest film studios are Jews, as are the owners of the
> nation's largest newspaper chain and the most influential single
> newspaper, the New York Times".
>
> Is it a conspiracy of Jews to steal the Republic? No, no conspiracy is
> necessary. In Jules Verne's juvenile novel, Children of Captain Grant,
> a villain leads the captain's ****p astray by placing a magnet brick
> beneath the compass. The magnet does not conspire: it constrains the
> compass. The sheer mass of self-involved Jews in the media acts in a
> similar way and draws the superpower off its normal course. For the
> media is the nerve system of a modern state. Modern democracy in
> practice in a very complicated society can be compared to a
> sophisticated computer. Its machinery can function successfully on one
> condition: there is a free flow of information across the system.
> While every input is instinctively checked and sieved on one
> criterion, whether it is good for Jews..
>
> Thus, concentration of Jews in the media created the distortion. A
> takeover of every other part of industry or trade would be noticed and
> re****ted in the media; but there is no remedy for media takeover...
>
> Gandhi could be condemned as 'racist', for he 'noticed' the privileged
> position of the British in India. By PC logic, a good American should
> reply to Mahatma: yes, there are some rich and powerful Brits in
> India, but there are also poor Tommy Atkinses, governesses, honest
> administrators, writers like Kipling and Orwell. On the other hand,
> there are powerful and rich Rajas, im****tant Brahmins. How do you
> dare, sir, to demand 'de-colonisation'! This is sheer anti-English
> racism!
>
> An old Indian Air Force officer Joe Thomas actually reminded that,
> "while the population of the US today is approximately the same as the
> population of India a century ago, the British in India never numbered
> more than 50,000 and still ruled India. They did not rule India by
> force but by dominating Indian discourse. Indians fought for the
> British and put down rebellions. During the two world wars, millions
> of Indians fought as volunteers for Britain. If such a tiny group
> could control India, then it is not strange that 100 times that number
> can influence the United States"...
>
>
> http://www.ihr.org/
http://www.natvan.com
>
> http://www.thebirdman.org
http://www.nsm88.com/
>
> http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
|
