Re: Guardian: Solar power from Sahara could provide Europe's electricity,

Paul C wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:13:07 +0100, "Dr Quite" <quite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> 
>>> Bloomberg 22 July
>>> "About 74 kilograms (163 pounds) of uranium leaked two weeks ago from
>>> a nuclear waste plant owned by Areva SA at the site behind her
>>> mother's home in Bollene. Tests showed that the ground water was
>>> contaminated even before the leak. On July 18, Paris-based Areva
>>> announced a second case, saying uranium may have seeped out of a
>>> broken pipe for years at a plant in Roman- sur-Isere, 100 kilometers
>>> (62 miles) north of Bollene.
>> Looking beyond the use of emotive words like "contaminate" and "leak",
what 
>> were the effects of these events?
>>
> 
> 
> Emotive words such as 'contaminate' and 'leak'!! LOL!!
> 
> We may know the full effects of these events in 50 years time.
> 
>> In other words, some uranium got into the wrong place but so what?
> 
> LOL!
> 
> Nothing to worry about really. 1/40,000,000,000 of a gram of
> Polonium210, a product of the decay of Uranium238 is lethal when
> ingested.
> 
> 74 kilograms leaked? Not much of problem there is there Dr Quite?
>> I have to repeat my question: Do you have a point? 
>>
> LOL!

Every hectare of normal topsoil contains around 100kg of Uranium

-- 
Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/
- Transcendence UK
Remote Viewing cl***** in London