Re: Can You Trust Chemotherapy to Cure Your Cancer?

"Richard Schultz" <schultr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:g6a1js$u1o$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In misc.health.alternative The One True Zhen Jue 
> <Andrew_Kingoff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> : On Jul 24, 5:43?am, schu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Richard Schultz) wrote:
> :> In misc.health.alternative Carole <hub...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> :> : And when I say people should think for themselves and question 
> authority,
> :> : there are some who say they do. . .
> :> : People fawn and grovel in front of experts and trust everything
they 
> say.
>
> :> Has it ever occurred to you that a person might be able to think for 
> himself
> :> and come to the conclusion that the experts are correct? Has it ever
> :> occurred to you that if you know nothing about a subject, the odds
that
> :> thinking for yourself is going to lead you to any conclusion that is 
> even
> :> close to be correct are very, very, very small?
>
> : The very same points have been made to you regarding acupuncture.
>
> I have come to the conclusions that the experts -- i.e. those who know
how
> to design an experiment properly and to re****t its results accurately --
 
> are
> correct, and that there is no evidence for the efficacy of acupuncture
> beyond a placebo effect.

Turn it up Richard. Chemo is all about marginal shrinking of tumours for a

period and nothing to do with curing cancer.

>
> : If only you were capable of thinking rationally on the topic of
> : acupuncture...
>
> The one who is incapable of rational thought, alas, is you.  The proof
is
> quite evident to anyone who is as not as blinded with rage against those
> who disagree with him as you are.  One might start with your insistence
> on responding to posts that I write that have nothing to do with 
> acupuncture
> and inserting another one of your patented rants.

Have you done my silica test or my athletes foot test?
No!


>
> I have given you a long list of articles, and expressed a willingness to
> discuss with you what you think the problems with the articles are that 
> their
> evidence against the efficacy of acupuncture can be dismissed.  Not only

> have
> you failed to accept that offer -- you have refused in principle even to
> *read* the articles in question, not even the one that you claim 
> (incorrectly)
> sup****ts your position, and not even the one written by a professor of
> complementary medicine.  I have offered to discuss with you the 
> statistical
> problems with re****ts of clinical trials of acupuncture, and why Peter 
> Moran's
> statements that negative results should probably be given more weight
than
> positive ones are to be taken seriously.  Not only have you refused to 
> enter
> such a discussion, you have refused to acknowledge my offer.  I have
asked 
> you
> for your comments on an article that I found that presented a conjecture
> about the origin of the belief in meridians, and asked you to comment. 
> You
> certainly refused to comment, and I am sure refused to read the article
> as well.

I wouldn't read anything you recommend because there's no evidence you
think 
outside the conventional system that you've been trained to follow.
You're more interested in sup****t the current system than looking for 
truth -- you have so much invested in your conventional career to question

it would threaten your chosen career.


Carole
www.conspiracee.com
www.cellsalts.net