On Jul 25, 5:49=A0am, Iarnrod <iarn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jul 24, 7:24=A0am, PHD <phe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 23, 9:44=A0pm,Iarnrod<iarn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > sack-o-****i wrote:
> > > > "BDK" <****llk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:MPG.22e=
fdcb88db9c44c989999@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > In article <g64upu$dc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > > > sack-o-****...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> > > > >> "BDK" <****llk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:MPG.=
22ef40dc21dbbc1198998b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> > In article <g62isq$pc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > > >> > sak-o-****...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> > > > >> >> "BDK" <****llk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:M=
PG.22ee8b63831ff0d498997d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> >> > In article <g62bff$qh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > > >> >> > sack-o-****...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> > > > >> >> >> "BDK" <****llk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenew=
s:MPG.22ed3fbe678f2d83989962@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> >> >> > In article <g5uq5j$p0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > > >> >> >> > sack-o-****...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> "BDK" <****llk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message=
news:MPG.22ec5a2d14057c7b989950@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> >> >> >> > In article <g5tqq7$vc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > > >> >> >> >> > sack-o-sh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> "Patrick Keenan" <t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenew=
s:2r6dnb_tYche8B_VnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > "VTR" <vexjo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:O-edn=
cBeYb8Hyx_VnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> June 10, 2008 - 5:13PM
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Sen. Karen Johnson's floor speech about 9/11
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Provided to the Tribune
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> 9/11 Floor Speech
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> MR. PRESIDENT =3D3F POINT OF PERSONAL PRIVILEGE.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS IN THE GALLERY =3D3F and
t=
hen I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THAT MY REMARKS OF
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> MORE THAN 200 WORDS BE ENTERED INTO THE JOURNAL.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Members -- I would like to introduce a very
speci=
al guest who has been joined today by several
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> of his closest friends. Up in the gallery, we
hav=
e many of the members of the Phoenix 9/11
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Truth group =3D3F people who are asking for a
new=
, independent investigation of the attacks of
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Sept. 11, 2001. In particular, I would like to
in=
troduce to you a VERY courageous man named
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Blair Gadsby. I=3D3Fm going to ask the folks
with=
Blair to help him to stand as I tell you a little
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> about him. Blair is very weak because he has
been=
fasting for more than two weeks to try to
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> bring attention to the cause of 9/11 Truth. This
=
is the 16th day that Blair has gone without
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> food and spent his day outside the office of
U.S.=
Senator John McCain pleading with the senator
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> to take a look at new evidence in the 9/11
crimes=
.. We have one man who is sacrificing his own
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> personal needs and desires to stand boldly
pleadi=
ng for the world to take notice, to question,
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> to research and not place their lives into the
ha=
nds of media sound-bites, - to think for
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> themselves, consciously and critically. Blair is
=
an educator and to me this is what the great
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> educators do. Thousands of people all over the
co=
untry and actually around the world have been
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> watching on the internet as this Hunger Strike
pr=
ogresses here in Phoenix. I want Blair to know
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> that I am his biggest fan and that good people
ev=
erywhere admire him for his courage and
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> determine. Please give a warm welcome to Blair
Ga=
dsby and the Phoenix 9/11 Truth movement. (STOP)
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
*************************************************=
************
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> (FLOOR SPEECH) Last month, I started speaking
pub=
licly regarding my concerns about the attacks
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> of Sept. 11, 2001, which brought down the Twin
To=
wers of the World Trade Center, as well as
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Building 7. If you=3D3Fve watched the media
cover=
age since I first began to speak out, you know how
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> vicious and irrational it has been toward me.
The=
media have worked hard to try to make it seem
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> silly to even question the 9/11 Commission
Re****t=
, even though some of its own authors have
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> done so, including both of the Commission
Co-Chai=
rmen =3D3F Mr. Hamilton and Keane.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Actually, the 9/11 Commission Re****t represents
j=
ust one theory =3D3F the theory that fire and the
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> damage from the airplane impacts brought down
the=
three buildings. This theory explains none of
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> the features of the destruction
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Actually, it explains all of them.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> that we all witnessed that day and which we can
s=
till observe
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> on hundreds of videos. It explains nothing about
=
how in four out of four cases, no hijacking
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> code was transmitted by the hijacked airliners,
a=
nd in four of four cases, no fighter jets
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> managed to get alongside any of the hijacked
airl=
iners.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Neither of those are "features of destuction" of
t=
he buildings themselves. They may be features of the hijacking,
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > but
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > not
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > of
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > the
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > collapses.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> The military officers who lied to
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Congress about their failure to protect America
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > And who, exactly, were these military officers? =
=A0 Names and ranks, please, and be clear about the nature of the
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > lies.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > If you're going to claim that people lied, at
leas=
t have the backbone to identify them.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> would have been referred for prosecution by
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> some of the 9/11 Commissioners, but those
Commiss=
ioners were told that they did not have that
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> authority.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Which is probably true. =A0 Read the terms of the
=
commission to find out.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >>The events of that day were a heinous crime
agains=
t our nation and our citizens,
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Yes they were, and most of those who perpetrated
i=
t died in the event.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> and
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> the sense of justice that exists in each one of
u=
s demands to know what really happened and how
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> all the perpetrators will be caught and
punished.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > How, exactly, does the speaker propose that we
cat=
ch and punish the dead?
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> The speculation and theorizing won=3D3Ft end
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> until a thorough, transparent investigation,
free=
of conflicts of interest, takes place.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Among the many theories that you can find on the
=
Internet is one that rises above all the rest.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> It is rock-solid, confirmed by hard evidence,
and=
sup****ted by hundreds of scholars,
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> architects, engineers and other professionals
who=
have the education, training, and expertise
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> to know what they=3D3Fre talking about. This is
t=
he theory that explosive demolitions brought down
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> the Twin Towers and Building 7.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Oh, please.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > There is no such "rock-solid" evidence for
control=
led demolition. =A0 It does not exist.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> But there is rock solid evidence of US gvt
deliberat=
ely obstructing the work
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> of the 9/11 Commission. From the fact that they've
s=
talled it's set up, to the
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> fact that Zelikow was "monitoring" the work of the
9=
/11 Commission and
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> "supplying" it with do***ents the White House
cleare=
d first.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> Geroge Bush is a moron. And so are you, Patrick.
You=
deserve each other.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> And don't you look at me. Not my fault. It's your
fa=
ult. Live with it.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> > BWHAHAHAHA! You're drooling again, Sack...
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> Since you've replied, that means I am not.
>
> > > > >> >> >> > And my reply is connected with your drooling in what
way=
?
>
> > > > >> >> >> > Drooling kooks are funny.
>
> > > > >> >> >> And again. Since you've replied twice, that means I am
nei=
ther"drooling" nor a "kook".
>
> > > > >> >> > You think too much of yourself Sack. I reply BECAUSE
you're=
a drooling
> > > > >> >> > kook.
>
> > > > >> >> > Why can't you get that through that incredibly tiny head
of=
yours?
>
> > > > >> >> Third reply. Keep 'em coming, BDK.
>
> > > > >> > Your delusions fascinate me.
>
> > > > >> Fourth one, BDK.
>
> > > > > You can count to four?
>
> > > > > Good for you!! Your folks must be so proud.
>
> > > > > And to think the doctors said you would never make it past
three.
>
> > > > > And the next number is what Sackso****y?
>
> > > > And again, your constant replying prove you wrong, old fart.
>
> > > BWAHAHAAHHAAAAAA!!! You got him, BDK!! Sack-o couldn't get past
> > > three!! He's covering up for the fact that he doesn't know the next
> > > number! BWAHAHAAAHHAAAAAA!!!- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 >He's covering up for the fact that he doesn't
know=
the
> > next
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0number! BWAHAHAAAHHAAAAAA!!!<
>
> > Since yo the cover-up expert as a debunker its you who cant get by the
> > last number.
>
> Excuse me, dickwad, but could you please post in English next time?
>
> Thank you, moron kooker.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
>Excuse me, dickwad, but could you please post in English next
time?
Thank you, moron kooker.<
Yes "larnturd" I see your problem - your low intelligence level
precludes you from understanding the "English Language" designated as
you are as a simpleton from over there - dont worry though cos I aint
gonna be answerin too much more of your drivel & ad hom posts cos you
aint got no cred. And you are more borin than Im kook - like BDK who
has a vibrator up his arse to ****ge whats left of his largely defunct
brain into action. My holidays are over wont have too much time to
trade !"tack" with you perves. Tara
|
