Let's be smarter than they are for a change.
====================================
Yep, we know the Oligarchy was gunning for us as much as for Arabs when
they
got us to do the fightn, cause everybody knows that when this country has
sought to overthrow any other country they have always done so by
fomenting
conflicts of some kind between that country and some other country. But
now
we know they are gunning for us, because instead of getting Iran to fight
Iraq or Afganistan to fight Russia or Serbia to fight Croatia this time
they
pulled the 9-11 mass-murder frameup so's we middle-class folks would have
to
do the killin' and payin'. ?
And now they think they got us over a barrel cause we are stuck with two
skull 'n Bones pirates, Kerry and Bush as the only candidates and they
know
lack the brains or gumption to think for ourselves and not rely on our
own
traditional habitual political parties to do our thinking and deciding for
us, right?
But hold on. I don't see where it is written in the Constitution that we
have to be stupid fools and fall for the same damn trick every damn time,
do
you? In fact, it seems to me as we've got them over a barrel.
Think about it. Most of us don't want this killing of foreigners and
getting our sons and daughters killed, especially when there's no point to
it. Iraq never hurt America and neither did Afganistan, nor did any of
the
other countries they're talking about taking over next, did they.
Especially since we now know from the those pictures taken by witnesses at
the Pentagon and by the security camera they had there that the whole
stoary
of hateful Arabs taking box cutters and taking over those jetliners and
cra****ng them is all a hoax. Got the URLs that prove it right here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TRUTHBAZOOKA/message/5
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/Eastman/m18h05.html
Like I said, we've got them over a barrel and, in fact, they've painted
themselves into a corner to boot.
Here's what I mean. Only a select few people in this country really enjoy
the idea of killing Arabs time or tossing our sons and daughers into the
furnace of war or bankrupting the country or making the criminal bosses
running this country even more rich and powerful, right? And its becoming
more and more obvious that that's what we're doing, isn't it?
Now think about it. That small group of people who love getting innocent
people killed and bankrupting the country and setting up rich-kid
Emperor's
with a taste for throwing people to the lions, those people are no going
to
be dividing their votes between Bonesman pirate Bush and Bonesman pirate
Kerry, right? Which means that there is going to be a minority that's
divided in its vote between equally desirable-to-them but
rotten-to-the-rest-of-us candidates, right?
So how can we loose? Only one way. If they get you to think that Bush
and
Kerry, Democrat and Republican, are the only possible choices that can be
made. But that is totally untrue, unless they can hoodwink us into
thinking
it is true so that we give up without even trying to take what is really
plum ripe for the taking. Did you get that?
Now, I haven't heard a peep from the Libertarians, or the Prohibitionists,
or the Socialist, or the Taxpayer Party, or the Greens, or the Reform
Pary,
or any of those other parties, have you? And I haven't seen any man
against
these wars and this theft and corruption even looking like he is thinking
about getting up on a white horse and asking one of these parties if he
can
be their champion and go up against the plundering pirates to get them off
our throats, have you? I suspect that there is a lot of big money and
favors and politicing going on in all those parties to either keep them
from
fielding an anti-war anti-plutocracy candidate or else to field one who is
such a jackass and who is so fatally flawed in so many ways that he won't
have a chance of winning, someone the party will just go through the
motions
of sup****ting, but not really intending that the candidate would win --
not
really fighting for the candidate. Remember Pat Buchanan running on the
Reform Party Ticket?
So that is what they are counting on to keep their two bloodthirsty
bonesmen
from getting any competition from a candidate and a party that will
provide
the country with what the country really desperately needs.
The question is can we beat that game and are you willing to try?
I think their game can be beaten if we use the internet to get the
situation
explained to enough people and then offer them the only way out that
makes
any sense.
In fact it make so much sense I don't even have to spell it out for you.
But I will make this suggestion -- don't get behind a third party or a
candidate unless they and he frankly acknowledge that the odd of them
living
through the reforms they will have to initiate are going to be too slim
for
any regular politician to want to throw in. Harry Brown is going to look
out for number one and stay free of bullets in an unfree world. Buchanan
is
going to spend his campaign in the pub talking about the little people.
Nader is actually pro-war and pro-occupation too -- in fact he probaly
declared as a independent "me-too" because he was afraid the Greens
might
pick him again and force him to offer himself as a target to another
disturbed Catcher in the Rye fan. Kucinich, of course, is prohibited by
new laws from running as a third party candidate after seeking a major
party
candidacy. So who does that leave for a third pary candidate?
Actually any honest intelligent candidate would do if he (or she) had the
heroic character and a simple grasp of how the oligarchy works its scams.
And since it would be a coalition of third parties, there would have to be
patronage, giving each party its own segment of the government for promote
their ideas.
Secretary of the Treasury: Libertarian nationalist (not
anarcho-capitalist)
Secretary of State: Buchananite
Secretary of Defense: Kucinich Democrat
Secretary of Interior: Naderite not beholden to lawyers
Attorney General: Populist willing to apply anti-trust where as it has
never been used before
Commerce: LaRouchian
Education: eliminate
etc.
Pooling all the best minds of each third party, plus the Kucinich and Dean
democrats and the paleoconservative Republicans to play rough and for
keeps with the old corruption -- who I think everyone will desert once
they
are stripped of key power.
And I am sure we all have pet reforms we would like to put in to fix the
broken republic. Mine would be returning selection of Senators to the
respective state legislatures. Returning selection of the President to
locally elected electors who run as candidates in their own right tied to
no
man or party -- but who convene in session until they agree on a
President
and Vice President. That is the system the Founding Fathers gave us, and
it
sure makes no sense to pretend that we sup****t there principles when we
have
let the criminals do away with the most im****tant elements of the "checks
and balances" system, don't you think?
And of course I'd like to see international trade and the monetary system
re-regulated -- ending forever the practice of overseas investing,
limiting
free trade to what it should be -- the trade in goods and in raw materials
and in tourism and nothing else.
So, tell me -- are you willing to foget about your past political party
habits and to get behind the first candidate of whatever third party who
is
willing to end the war, end the occupation, and impose holy hell on the
cor****ations and the perverse cor****ation and financial system that made
these crimes inevitable.
They'll call him/her a dictator, like they did Huey Long, and they will
probably kill him or her like they did Huey too -- but that is what
great
people do, isn't it? and we are about due for another crop of great people
arent we.
So let's watch the third parties and see which one has what it takes to
offer what it is going to take.
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Wa****ngton
Every man is responsible to every other man.
|
