"Dick Eastman" <de1949@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:...
> The Last Word on the 9-11 Commission
>
> Without 9-11 Investigators' Input its Conclusions are but Uninformed
Opinion
>
> by Dick Eastman
> Citizen investigator of 9-11
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
>
> The Commission -- originally planned to be headed by Henry Kissinger who
> once said, "It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but a matter
of
> what is perceived to be true." -- has never acknowledged publically the
> existence of citizens with photographic evidence they claim establishes
> that 9-11 to have been frame-up.
>
> Al Falzenberg has been the gatekeeper and triage of all information
> directed to the Committee -- note the Jewish name and realize that the
Bush
> administration would not select one of the 45 percent of Jews who oppose
the
> current wars of conquest against Moslem nations -- must be held
accountable
> for active obstruction of justice, for assisting in a coverup of
evidence
> that fingers the true perpetrators.
>
> The Commission, I conclude, and I am confident future impartial history
will
> bear me out, has had only two objectives from the beginning:
>
> 1. To consumate the cover-up; and
>
> 2. To provide contrived rationale for consolidation of police power into
a
> Stalinist "NVKD"-type police state, unanswerable to anyone, the
operations
> and objectives of which are unknown to anyone, and the control of which
> remains in the hands of America's power-elite Oligarcy, the proven
> perpetrators of 9-11.
>
> Dick Eastman
> 223 S. 64th Ave.
> Yakima, Wa****ngton 98908
>
> ---
>
> Are you also uninformed about the evidence proving 9-11 was a frame-up?
> Here is the critical information needed to derive an informed opinion of
> what really happened on September 11, 2001:
>
> Consider what citizen investigators have uncovered regarding the
alleged
> "attack" on the Pentagon:
>
>
> 1. Pentagon security camera shows
> a. Too short a plane
> b. Smoke trail of a missile being fired
> c. White-hot flash explosion consistent with a missile warhead
>
> 2. Photos show wrong crash imprint in the wall
>
> 3. Photos show and wrong flash-powder burn darkening the wall
>
> 4. Downed lampposts and witnesses each identified a different
> approach path to the Pentagon, the Boeing's and the killer jet's
>
> 5. Wrong kind of debris
>
> 6. Single piece of right kind of debris shown to have been
> found on the opposite side of the approach path from
> the side of the plane where that particular piece had
> to have come from.
>
> 7. Witnesses also
>
> a. heard a missile
>
> b. heard a sonic boom prior to blast
>
> c. smelled burning chordite after the blast
>
> d. saw a radar blip behaving like a jet-fighter blip
>
> 8. No photos of wreckage from inside consistent with the crash
>
> 9. Evidence of only one engine and one seat , a pilots seat.
>
> 10. A distraction plane, ur engine plane making dives over D.C.
> both photographed, videotaped and shown on BBC, and
> re****ted (erroneously) by many wintesses as the actual plane
> "diving at an irrecoverable angle)
>
> 11. The attack was made almost horizontally into the first-floor
> level -- consistent with a countour-hugging jet-fighter attack
>
> 12. Normal rescuers were prevented from entering the building
> while only certain people, including Rumsfeld himself, conducted
> (screened) victims from the building
>
> 13. Rumsfeld had recently been given exclusive power to
> OK air interceptions -- and yet he was in his office the whole
> time the twin towers were hit, and when the Pentagon was
> hit he went to oversee "rescue" instead of going to the situation
> room where his interception authority could be given -- he
> arrived at the situation room at about the time the Pennsylvania
> plane (backup for the Pentagon) was finally shot down.
>
> 14. The various drills and practices for an air attack on the Pentagon
> including some kind of simulation on 9-11-01 itself, coupled with
> denials that such an attack had been considered possible.
>
> 15. Impossible stories by, for example, John Judge (regarding
> his amazing stewardess friend who claims to have seen the
> Boeing inside the hole, recognized the plane as the one she
> always flew, recongized her stewardess friend as a victim by
> a photo of her severed arm with the matching "friend****p
> bracelett" they both wore; that she was passing out
> doughnuts and coffee to the rescue workers with the salvation
> army when the salvation army was nowhere in evidence at the
> scene -- John Judge who is a professional JFK conspiracy
> theory debunker and discloses that this same stewardess
> friend is also a JFK theory investigator, the same
> John Judge who launched the phony "People's Investigation
> of 9-11 with a press conference by stating that the Pentagon
> attack is not something responsible investigators should bother
> investigating etc. since we "know" the Boeing hit the Pentagon
> and don't want to be a laughing stock etc. -- the People's
> investigation that never once reviewed any of the evidence
> packages I posted to them -- the same John Judge who to this
> day refuses to debate Dick Eastman on any internet forum and
> whom all -- dare I use the term -- "responsible" 9-11
investigators
> think is a John Judge who is working for the coverup, for
> obstruction of justice, and because he does it so badly is himself
> become one of the proofs of the frameup along with the known-
> only-to himself flight attendant who works one of the flights that
> most definitely had to have been regularly monitored by
> US intelligence operatives, probably flight attendents, and
> this one just happened not to take Flight 77 that day by
> happenstance etc. -- so how about it, Mr. Judge?
>
> 16. The deaths of only the CIA's indepdendent intelligence
> revivals , the Offices of Naval Intelligence personel, and
> auditors of defense spending contracts etc. alone moved
> into the "newly renovated" section that was hit -- on the side
> where most of the witnesses would be the Arlington Cemetery
> dead or people involved with driving their cars. Naval Intelligence
> would have independently investigated 9-11 had they lived --
> the investigator that no official has yet conducted -- Wolfowitz
> sure bin Laden had done it and ready with the solution of invading
> Afganistan on the very first day -- even as they were allegedly taken
> by complete suprise only a few hours before that determination.
>
>
> See the confirming photos and witness testimony and further analysis
> by respected scientific minds substantiating all of the above here:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TRUTHBAZOOKA/message/5
>
> and here
>
> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/Eastman/m18h05.html
>
> Dick Eastman
> Yakima, Wa****ngton
> Every man is responsible to every other man.
>
>
>
|
