Dear fellow list discussants (anti-capitalism, libertarian issues etc.) --
My operation is down with a multiplicity of problems that need not be
gone
into -- I can't send the pictures -- I can't use my ISP e-mail, which
leaves
out cross posing
but I have been able to put up some im****tant articles in a few of my
archive-functioning yahoogroups -- here is a listing of the three most
im****tant recent ones and the URLs for geting to the public archives
(public 7yahoogroup archives are my way around not being able to afford a
website of my own -- although the pictures have to be links only.)
----------------------------
1. Slaughterhouse wedge -- sealed off by incendiary devices, the new
Pentagon wedge became a killing field -- hole in "c;" ring and attempted
escape
2. With this discovery we now know it is Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz who
are threatening atomic terror if 9-11black-op disclosures are made an
ssue -- how dare they!
3.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/8
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimedata/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TRUTHBAZOOKA/
The above articles I believe are im****tant to all pro-peace, pro-9-11
truth,
anti-corruption etc. readers. Remember, I dwell on the Pentagon evidence
in
some posts only because that is the best-case, the case with conclusive
evidence proving the most unforgivable unignorable atrocity crime against
humanity -- that ALONE can bring down the criminal oligarchy that
threatens
billions of humanity around the planet.
Dick Eastman
Yakima
P.S. For commiserating fellow fighters of the frustrated "small-plane"
9-11
school especially --
-------------------
Of "Coolers" and other false-oppositon tactics operators (John Judge,
Webfairy discussed)
Becuase my four computers are all unable to download mail or send mail via
my ISP addresses dharma@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
("senhor san") and de1949@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dick Eastman) have been shut off -- I have lost, unread, most mail sent
to be over the two weeks. Each morning my yahoo address "oldickeastman"
(please don't write there, it only is allowed 4 mgs. of mail holding and I
have to be continually deciding what im****tant mail i must throw out or
sl-o-o-o-ly download to desktop etc. -- and viruses have made my mouse a
staggering drunk in zero-gravity. "Whine whine whine, Eastman," as my
friends the ADL freepers like to say.
By the way -- I want to coin a new term for our calling, describing what
webfairy does. There is a movie recently released to CD/video called "The
Cooler" which I have not seen, the box of which defines the term as a
person
hired by a casino to join a gaming table where a player, say at blackjack,
is in a very favorable state of alertness and judgement and realistic
confidence suitably reinforced by some successes for doing the right thing
under those conditions -- the blurb on the box called this a "lucky
streak,"
I think -- and so the "Cooler" joins that table and by conversations and
facial expression and exactly the wrong mindset "cools" (modifies,
disequilibrates, upsets, throws off etc. the "lucky" response patterning
of
the gambler.
Now suppose you are trying to tell some people something that is very
im****tant to them, but very complex and very contrary to the ambient
viewpoint being maintained by the envrioning social/informational powers
that be. And as soon as you get your case out with sup****ting evidence,
and
you are ready to see if people can accept what you have said or not -- the
first person to speak up is the "Cooler" who starts by 1) introducing a
multitude of theories based on the skimpiest information (literally
building
alternative "conspiracy theories" out of chance shadows and reflections
in
photographs -- and insisting that her theory, 2) creating a website (of
which you have none) and getting on all the key forums, planting her
unfounded absurdity, often getting to those forums first so that when you
get around to reaching these people -- the cooler has already conditioned
how others will receive you, accusing you of having a plot to suppress
her
theory and accuse you of being an agent yourself for the the way you have
shamelessly "dissed" her alternative (chance-shadow,
chance-reflection-based
theories) -- meanwhile, when you do make the logical presentation of the
evidence, pointing out each feature and and what various combinations of
events together imply etc. -- she is always the first one to "raise her
hand" with a comment, and it is every time some statement to divert,
de-rail, distract, muddy the waters, bring down to personality issues,
plus
a mountain of trivia, of generalizations, of the history of the
illuminatii,
of astrology, of UFOs (the Art Bell approach to coverup) -- in short,
attacking you ad hominum, while grafting on to what you have said a lot of
unrelated issues as if they were related, stupid issues -- so that people
reading her comments are confused and diverted and never respond with the
verdict in the case that you have so carefully built to appeal to the
rigid
narrow opinionated overly critical only-his-way-is-right
not-wanting -anyone-else-to-get-any-credit hate-filled "drunk" white male
mind (which is how she characterizes the only mind you happen to have at
your disposal -and by the way you don't drink --etc. The entire
webfairy
site is filled with "alternate theories to the small-plane" finding, but
without one link to that finding or the information that sup****ts it --
in
fact she is part of a network of "false opposition" websters all of whom
link to each other on their "9-11 sites" but which never link to
physics911
or the other empirical-deductive valid and verifyable double-checked
independently verified confirmed by dove-tailing -by-multiple-evidence
findings etc -- which people get bored with -- seeking new thrills (like
a
new action movie released) this one with airliners with missile saddle
bags, that one with holographic images appearing to crash into skyskrapers
at exactly the moment that internatal bombs or top-secret Buck Rogers
HAARP
EMP magneto-destructo rays are brought into play -- in other words we
have
Atmospheric Physicists stating certain UFO sitings indicate real craft
with
capabilities not that of airfoil jets etc. -- and right after he is done
talking a "contactee" steps in telling about being abducted by beautify
blondes in jump suits who are both physically attractive yet strangely
spiritual as if generating life energies that are real but which our
limited
male-logical thinking prevents us from enjoying -- and is the real basis
of
astrology and witchcraft which sensitive people should be open to so that
we
can defeat the thinking of bad-virbration-controlled people in government
and do you think HAARP is projecting those bad vibrations and poisoning
the
chemtrails to keep us down and maybe it is all planed to fail so that we
can
have NESARA which will give us exactly the government we need and is
planned
all along etc." -- sound vaguely familiar (of the type, webfairy doesn't
use all of these, but some of them and many others -- mixed with lots of
good, but off-topic, stuff which she picks up in her surfing travels
thereby
building her reputation with "other peoples' capital", except for the
"whatzit" and the "holograms" of course which are entirely her own (good
men
like Hoffman and Kaminsky jumping aboard here and there after being
impressed etc.)
For those who do follow me on this, the bottom line is this: "Coolers"
are
being sent to our 9-11 citizens criminal investigation "game table" -- and
they are meeting with a lot of success. (Note: And they will turn the
tables on you, calling YOU the "cooler" - to which you can offer only one
should-be-sufficient reply (provided that it is true), viz., that you are
merely presenting photos of the Pentagon attack, you are pointing out
features of those photos, you are taking those established facts and
stating
them without adding anything else, then you are comparing those
established-evidence-based-descriptive statements and, still adding
nothing
that is not already there, pointing out (logic operation deduction) the
implications of these facts taken together (as the existence of the
smoke-trail in the first frame of the video camera -- and photos of
smoke
trails of missiles fired by fighter jets and photos of contrail left by
Boeing 757's -- or photos of the damaged west wall right after the crash,
and photos of Boeing 757's along with their engineering dimensions as
given
by authoritative impartial sources etc. -- and when there are witness
statements -- to look at all witness statements and to no omit witness
statements that do not, at least at first, seem to reconcile with other
statements etc. In short -- your empirical-deductive method with
multiple-evidence and multiple-witness verification is your defense, as
well
as your open willingness to subject your conclusions to every objection,
every fact that a critic brings up in an effort to refute -- because a
scientific finding is only as strong as the track record of tests -- the
variety and completelness of tests to refute it that it has undergone --
this empirical-deductive-testing methond with nothing else added is your
defense
And of course, the cover-up uses different kinds of "coolers" like
different
golf clubs -- for example, John Judge appeals to a different crowd, even
as he offers Wa****ngton D.C. connections and semi-insiderness to make him
a
"source" to be recokoned with, who is "recongnized" and "responsible"
unlike the video-store clerk from Yakima. etc. -- even as he shuts down
all
Pentagon evidence investigatons using the total hearsay of an American
Airlines flight stewardess who recongized a FLight 77 stewardess by the
bracelet on a severed arm she was shown, who recongized the plane inside
the the Pentagon as exactly the Flight 77 plane that she used to pilot,
who
saw the tail fin of the Boeing when she looked in as she was serving
doughnuts to the rescue workers with the salvation Army, who is a fellow
JFK
researcher with Judge, who flys the Reagan National flight to L.A.
regularly, Reagan Nat. being one mile from the Pentagon, but of course
there
is no chance that, if she exists, that this Flight Attendant is a CIA or
NSA
asset -- or that John Judge is one for making her up (note: either
Judge
is basing his whole rejection of every line of evidence that I have
presented on the hearsay of someone who could very well be an agent of the
faction that perpetrated the 9-11 black-op (obviously they have agents in
strategic positions to carry off the desired effect -- no matter how close
John Judges friend****p and intimacy would be -- or can't women be that
deceiving to a cool men like James Bond? And he has refused to pass along
my list of questions to be put to this stewardess -- he has refused to
have
a second investigator (I suggested is friend Kyle Hence) to interview her,
keeping her name secret if they insist, but putting questions to her and
re****ting to us her answers, merely to validate her existence and to
overcome the confirmational deficiency of having everything this anonymous
person said coming to us through the "filter" of John Judge -- yet this
repeated request is ignored, me being too "irresponsible" as a researcher
even to deserve a response (which is exactly the stance/tactic of the
government, I must point out, isn't it?? Felzenberg and John Judge see
perfectly eye to eye on the small-plane evidence spokesmen, don't they?)
Or, there is to the fact that all of John Judges power and influence --
telling People's investiations that the Pentagon attack plane is off
limits
to inquiry (as he has done in every investigation he has particiaped in,
starting with the Judge-Rivero crippled "People's Investigation" early on
in San Francisco) -- yes, John Judge, who has taken it upon himself to
contact and take over the job of "protecting" victim's families from
"irresponsible" investigators (like me, like professors A. K. Dewdney and
Jerry Longspaugh from Sid Walker's physics9ll etc) -- so that they will
not
be troubled by our upsetting and irresponsible lines of questioning etc.
AND YET THE ONLY CONTRIBUTION THIS MAN HAS MADE TO THE INVESTIGATION IS
THE
FACT THAT THE GOVERNMENT HANDS HIM DOCUMENTS THAT HE CAN BE THE FIRST TO
COME OUT WITH, (SARAH ROBERTS AND RON HARVEY'S INVESTIGATIVE REPUTATIONS
WERE ENTIRELY BASED ON SIMILAR ADVANTAGES (PLUS EXPENSIVE WEBSITES AND
EXPENSIVE SOFTWARE TO PUT THEIR FALSE ARGUMENTS IN DISTORTED GRAPHICS !!!)
JOHN JUDGES REPUTATION AND HIS AUTHORITY AS THE MAN WHO CAN DETERMINE
WHICH
OF US ARE RESPONSIBLE (KYLE HENSE) AND WHICH ARE NOT (EVERY ONE OF THE
SMALL-PLANE AND NOT-A-BOEING CONCLUDING INVESTIGATORS ARE IN THIS
CATEGORY! FOR JOHN) -- AS I WAS SAYING, JOHNS REPUTATION AS A 9-11
INVESTIGATOR IS BASED ON THE DOCUMENTS HE IS HANDED AS A FAVORITE OF THE
GOVERNMENT AND ON HIS TOTALLY HEARSAY OFFERING OF THE ABSURDLY IMPOSSIBLE
AND DISCREDITED CLAIMS ABOUT THE STATEMENTS OF THIS ANONYMOUS STEWARDESS
THAT HE WILL NOT EVEN LET HIS TRUSTED "COLLEGAGUES" INTERVIEW FOR
SCIENTIFIC
VALIDITY (REPLICATION OF FINDING BY A SECOND PERSON'S INTERVIEW -- AND
WHY
IS THIS WITNESS THE ONLY ONE OF ALL WITNESSES SO GUARDED, SO PROTECTED --
HAVE PEOPLE LIKE ME TRASHED AND HARRASSED ANY WITNESSES??? DID RISKUS,
OR
FARAM, OR LAGASSE COMPLAIN ABOUT MY TREATMENT OF THEM IN OUR SHORT
COMPLETED AND TERMINATED EXCHANGES OF INFORMATION???
HEY, IM YELLING, AREN'T I -- FORGOT TO TURN OFF THE CAPS, didn't I?
Yes, Dick Eastman is a wild man -- if you know any stewardesses, keep
them
from Dick Eastman. John Judge will protect sweetness for them
What a waste of space!!! -- but this has been personally theraputic and
perhaps one or two souls will be smartened up by it -- or at least be
salved by heart-felt commiseration.
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Wa****ngton
Every man is responsible to every other man.
|
