Fw: The first wide open hearing on 9-11 -- be in Sonoma County Superior
Court monday morning!!!!
=========
sorry no time to properly format this for Usenet -- read it anyway -- de
--------------
I've spoken to John Jenkle and he is sharper than I am, has reached all
the
conclusion that I have and has pieced together many things that I missed.
He is so intelligent and so able to extrapolate and deduce from various
facts
that most people would not think to examine together -- that -- guess
hat --
an attempt is being made to have him committed and most likely medicated
for his political views.
There but by the grace of god go I. I can say that (at least for now) and
so can you.
"They came for the people who could really
think first, and I said nothing. Then they came for the people who can
grasp the obvious, and I said nothing. Now I am all alone and serving
for a very rich and great man who treats me very will -- etc."
Also, have you gone beyond Michael Moore, yet?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solidaritystreet/
Now read about the battle being fought by John Jenkel
and if you live in Northern California,
see if you can pack this courtroom on Monday.
In solidarity with John Jenkel,
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Wa****ngton
p.s. -- call John Jenkle for more information and directions to the
courthouse toll free:
800-500-7083 He is the most brilliant man I know of (except possibly
A.K.
Dewdney) who is totally for finding and communicating the truth no matter
what the personal cost. Don't let them take this man away. Call him --
so
you can verify what I say about him -- then give him your sup****t on
Monday.
His e-mail:
9-11bountyhunter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a "bounty hunter" going after the 911 Gang,
the bounty he seeks: getting his stolen country back
pass this on to the sf911truthalliance, as they have banned me
from sending to them -- I think many will go if they know about
John Jenkel's fight and plight.
----- Original Message -----
From: <9-11bountyhunter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
To: "Dick Eastman" <de1949@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 6:52 AM
Subject: The first wide open hearing on 9-11
> Da 9-11 Truth Campaign #1279
> JOHN JENKEL, in pro per
> 3325 Gravenstein Highway North
> Sebastopol, California 95472
> (707) 823-7083
>
> SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
> COUNTY OF SONOMA
>
> THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COURT NO. SCR-33708 ) D. A. NO. DAR-478938
> Plaintiff
> ADDENDUM TO AMENDED
> PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
> ) OF DENIAL OF CRIMINAL PROTECTIVE )
> ORDER FOR SOLE DEFENSE WITNESS ) vs.
> ) TRIAL: June 28, 2004, Ctrm 3, 9:30 A.M.
> )
> JOHN JENKEL, abused citizen )
> EXCULPATORY INFORMATION)
> 1299.01 & .O2 PC in favor of Defendant
> Defendant )
> 148.5 PC by alleged Victim )
> 148.5 PC by hostile Defense Witness
> ) CC Art. I, Sec 7 for Defense ______) US
> Code Title 18, Part I, Chapter 13, Section 241
> Petitioner respectfully alleges the following:
> I
> That petitioner is the Defendant in pro per in Case Number SCR-33708
charging him with
> a felony in the State of California, County of Sonoma. He has only one
cooperative
> witness of record.
> II
> A filing on June 21 sup****ts that the Defense deserves equal protection
under
> Constitution of California Article I, Section 7, and seeks the court's
issue of a
> PROTECTIVE ORDER IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDING for remaining cooperative
defense
> witness, Rachel Bell, a minor, from turned hostile and treacherous
witness
Elizabeth B.
> Zbinden ("LZ"). Ms Bell is ill and under a doctor's care. She may be
too weak to testify.
> This filing is added sup****t to protect the remaining cooperative
defense
witness on
> record. The court's concern about Defense standing appears to be
irrelevant.
> III
> Hostile witness LZ attempts to build a case for the Sheriff's Office
that
Defendant is
> mentally incompetent, delusional, and not able to defend himself.
Quite
the contrary, the
> Honorable Dennis Beaman found in MCR-417902, "There is no question this
man can
> defend himself" after Defendant debated parts of the Faretta Advisement.
His honor
> dismissed phone harassment charges in this matter during the next
hearing,
Hearing 12,
> following "Counsel relieved" in Hearing 11.
> IV
> The "no question" finding per by Judge Beaman regarding Defendant's in
pro choice
> followed the statement by Deputy District Attorney Rafael E. Donnally,
that , "Your Honor,
> Mr. Jenkel's children have been calling the District Attorney's office
saying he is not
> competent to stand trial." There can be no question that here is an
attempt to paint
> Defendant as "crazy." And there can be no question that the attempt to
paint Defendant as
> incompetent using his petrified children is the must evil short of
murder.
> V
> Apparently hostile LZ, two of four of Defendant's "children," and
Defendant's brother and
> his thee children have designs on Defendant's assets and play along
with
this evil. Da
> Machine (Willie Brown), Communist China, Enron, and NORML want Defendant
quieted
> but not silent and appear to be using LZ and his children to either get
Defendant
> committed for 72 hour psychiatric observation, or to get an attorney
between the
> Defendant and the court because Defendant "presents himself to be a
problem in the
> courtroom," according to dirty Santa Rosa attorney Martin Woods.
> IV
> If the court commits Defendant for observation as the corrupted PEOPLE
will no doubt
> request, make no mistake that Defendant will be forced to take chemicals
that will blow his
> mind so he will not be able to button his ****rt! The Homeland (false)
Security Act relieved
> all drug manufacturers and applicators of any liability. Defendant's
attempt to defeat the
> Homeland Security Act was sabotaged by his assistant at the time, Sandra
Weinstein.
> Consequently, Defendant's effort to help the US Senate pass the
Lieberman
Amendment
> No. 4953 that would have added back accountability to drug manufacturers
lost by a 47 to
> 51 Senate vote count. Because of Brown-plant Ms Weinstein's sabotage,
Defendant was
> only able to fax 23 out of 99 US Senate Offices in 8 hours of time
assigned to this effort.
> V
> This clearly corrupt and fraudulent act would have died if it had not
been
based on an
> unkept promise by Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott to a hand-full of
moderate
> Republicans who had switched their votes on Amendment No. 4953 based on
leader
> Lott's "commitment." Defendant filed for mandamus in pro per to a
federal
court in C-03-
> 1235 (SBA) in order to get this commitment honored. His petition was
disgustingly treated
> as a tort. The federal court of Susan Brown Armstrong appears to be
dirty Brown.
> VI
> The Homeland (false) Security Act's $40 billion slush fund is managed by
former
> Pennsylvania Governor Ghoul, Tom Ridge, who covered up sacred evidence
in
the
> HUMAN REMAINS (HUMAN REMAINS) that were scattered for 8 miles having
been
> blown out of Bush-ordered shot down United Flight 93.
> VII
> Governor Ghoul USED our $40 billion that we don't have to cover up the
demolition of the
> WTC Twin Towers and Building 7 AFTER the NYFD had declared that the all
fires were
> controlled and the buildings were safe for reentry.
VIII
> There is new evidence of intimidation of defense witnesses in this
matter.
The file on this
> case has Exhibits A, B, and C which were Endorsed Filed on June 18,
2004,
and attached
> hereto. All three exhibits include intimidating language by LZ that is
directed toward her
> neighbors Rachel Lamm and Lee Jones at 3381 Gravenstein Highway North.
Rachel
> Lamm has a tem****ary restraining order against LZ. If a RO is granted,
it will be LZ's
> second RO in less than a year.
> IX
> In Exhibit A, LZ pretends to be Defendant's property manager and urges
"Lee and Rachel
> to find a more tolerant landlord elsewhere," as though she, LZ, was the
landlord or
> Defendant's agent, which she is not. Her agency ended when she found
new
tenants and
> all dwellings were occupied. Treacherous LZ intimidates and attempts to
scare away
> Defendant's tenants which amounts to interfering with Defendant's
economic
relation****p.
> X
> In Exhibit B, LZ tells "Lee and Rachel, Now about John, don't get
involved. You don't
> seem to understand how mentally ill he is. If you get involved with him
you will get
> involved with the sheriff. He is on his way to jail. With all of his
cases pending there is no
> way he will not get some jail time. I and his family members are
keeping
very close taps
> on what's going on. They are very happy with the work that I am doing
here. All you need
> to do is pay your rent or move out and stay away from John and don't get
involved. " Here
> is more evidence of LZ's interfering with Defendant's economic
relation****p.
> XI
> In Exhibit C, LZ builds her alleged property manager status by writing,
"Make no mistake
> about it, I am the property manager." There is not one shred of proof
for
this unfounded
> claim.
> XII
> Exhibit D is a LZ's response to an Unlawful Detainer against her filed
by
Defendant, Case
> Number 178796. LZ sup****ts her case that the Defendant is incompetent
by
writing,
> "John Jenkel has a disease called Delusional Disorder, he knows it,
everybody around
> him knows it, and I am the first person who has ever told him to his
face.
There is
> irrefutable evidence for everything I have stated." Certainly no one has
shown any
> evidence to Defendant. There is no such evidence. Defendant is anxious
to show his
> evidence about 9-11 but no one wants to examine it, least of all
treacherous probable
> Brown plant LZ. Defendant welcomes his op****tunity to examine his
evidence that
> Communist China, Enron, and NORML sponsored 9-11 and Willie Brown's
connection to,
> and protection of, all three entities while proving his intent to expose
the 9-11 truth by his
> alleged unlawful actions as his affirmative defense.
> XIII
> There is other intimidation of witnesses in this case. Santa Rosa
Attorney Martin Woods
> told Rachel Lamm's brother Deric Lamm to "be careful and keep your
distance because
> he (Defendant) presents himself as a problem in the courtroom." Does
the
court agree?
> XIV
> Defendant questioned Mr. Woods about his apparent intimidation of
Defense
witness
> Deric Lamm. Mr. Woods replied, "You call me again and I'll have you
arrested for
> harassment." Mr. Woods abuses his power. Eventually a complaint with
the
State Bar of
> California will be filed.
> XV
> Defendant is listed as a "MENTAL SUBJECT" on his Sonoma County Sheriff's
> Department RAP Sheet. Sonoma County Sheriff Bill Cogbill is libel for
this defaming
> DefendaNT. More im****tantly, Sheriff Cogbill is subject to removal from
office for his
> holding Mary E. Morrison in custody in Sonoma County jail from when she
was set up on
> Nov. 17, 2004 to December 9, 2004. December 9 was the day that the
run-off election for
> mayor was held in San Francisco between Supervisor Gavin Newsom and his
opponent,
> top Bay Area Green Supervisor and Board President Matt Gonzalez. Brown
machine
> candidate Newsom won by less that 3 %. His Brown-stained opponent
Gonzalez
> conceded within 90 minutes of poll closing without bail on a misdemeanor
warrant from
> Gallatin County.
> XVI
> Brown machine Sheriff Cogbill held modern Joan of Arc Mary E. Morrison
in
virtual
> isolation so her observation of mass murder of third world people for
cor****ate agenda
> would never reach San Francisco's substantial Asian and Korean
communities. Sheriff
> Cogbill knows that Defendant will hold him accountable eventually.
Consequently, he is
> desperate for any shred of evidence that Defendant is "crazy" and his
goons harass my
> tenants for confirmation. Tenants Rachel Lamm and Lee Jones will be
summoned to
> testify on this point.
> XVII
> LZ, Sheriff Cogbill and his Office, Defendant's "children," and Attorney
Woods appear to
> conspire against Defendant's constitutional rights in violation of US
Code
Title 18, Part I,
> Chapter 13, section 241, Conspiracy against rights. Defendant has
been
unjustly jailed
> four times since October 28, 2004, all as a result of his campaign to
end
54 years of mass
> murder for cor****ate agenda. Each time Defendant is jailed, he is
examined by a
> psychatrist. Each time, Defendant used the op****tunity to spread the
truth about 9-11 to a
> free thinker. He has become an expert at it. The County of Sonoma has
evidence on file
> that sup****ts the fact that Defendant is totally sane and very
passionate.
> XVIII
> Apparently Defendant did not properly introduce California's Bail
Fugitive
Recovery
> Person's Act, 1299.01 PC and 1299.02, as exculpatory evidence for a
felony
charge of
> false imprisonment under 236 PC in this case. Defense is requesting
Judicial Notice of
> 1299.01 PC and 1299.02 PC in a companion filing.
> XIX
> Despite direct testimony in sup****t of the Defendant's use of
non-violence
toward alleged
> Victim Morrison, and despite the court's initially claiming, "Twelve
ninety-nine's been
> repealed" and the court's eventual realization that it, in fact, lives
and
could be the
> foundation for the Defendant's plea of not guilty to all charges, the
court issued a
> PROTECTIVE ORDER IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDING in favor of alleged Victim
Morrison
> and against Defendant who had the color of 1299.01 and .02 PC and
direct
testimony of
> non-violence in his favor. This PO is hindering alleged Victim who is a
modern Joan of
> Arc, and Defendant, who is da 9-11 Bounty Hunter, from working together
to
end 54 years
> of mass murder of third world civilians for cor****ate agenda.
> XX
> To issue the PO against Defendant in favor of alleged Victim, the court
relied upon the
> sworn testimony of three Sonoma County Sheriff Deputies, all of whom the
evidence to be
> presented in trial will show deliberately misled the court and perjured
themselves. The
> trial will also show prosecutorial misconduct and judicial misconduct by
elected officers of
> the court who are father and son. The deputies, DA, and a judge
apparently conspired
> against the constitutional rights of Defendant. In light of an apparent
conspiracy to commit
> him and destroy his university educated and life-time patriotic mind
that
is driven to end
> conflict, will the court protect the Defendant by immediately commencing
a
speedy and fair
> public trial so that Defendant may confront all the PEOPLE'S deceptive
or
intentionally
> inaccurate witnesses, and stop the lying and mass murder?
> XXI
> The court issued for the Plaintiff a PO that was apparently based on
fraud
for the
> unnecessary protection of Plaintiff witness Mary E. Morrison. The
petitioner requests that
> the court provide equal protection, as called for by the Constitution of
California in Article I,
> Section 7, and fairness for the Defense by issuing a PO based on fact
for
the herein
> shown necessary protection of Defense witness Rachel Bell from
continuing
and
> increasingly abusive Elizabeth Zbinden, and from the desperate Sonoma
County Sheriff's
> Office and the treasonous Sonoma County District Attorney's Office, and
from out of line Mr
> Woods.
> XIII.
> And further, petitioner asks that if the court is uncomfortable with
adding county officials
> and an attorney to the protective order of a Defense witness, that the
court in the very least
> admonish the Sheriff's Office, the DAO, and Attorney Woods to stay the
hell away from
> Defendant's witness of face court orders.
> VERIFICATION
> John Jenkel states that I am the petitioner in the foregoing petition
and
that I have read
> the contents of the forgoing petition and they are true of my own
knowledge.
> I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and
correct.
> Executed on ______________ in Sonoma County, California
> _____________________________________
> John Jenkel, in pro per
>
|
