The Michael Moore do***entary will set up a set of sterile topics that will
be discussed my mass-media informed m***** -- drowning out the real
best-evidence tale-telling facts -- setting the tone and agenda and, most
im****tant, the boundaries, of the popular "truth movement" culture that
coalesces around that skilled false-oppositin propaganda film.
Dick Eastman
(more follows)
You have been wanting the truth of 911 to get out -- so Michael Moore,
bankrolled by Eisner's Disney Corp. comes out with a limited-hangout
cover-up that shows bush people picking their noses etc. and flying out
Saudis (setting up Kerry with popular demand for the next Afganistan/Iraq,
this time plundering and murdering Saudi Arabia.)
Then Michael Moore is suddenly in theaters, and the Trotskyite
(Zionist-manipulated left movements) are pu****ng him as the means of
electing Kerry.
Whereas me, all alone, with the hard evidence proving 911 was a frame-up
--
evidence that would bring down all "bi-partisan" organized-crime rule
(i.e.
both Bush and Kerry and all behind each of them) -- is left to talk to
you
with dixie cups on a string
but the power and brightness of evil deception, not withstanding, good
people with good minds will sift until they find the real truth
the only question is" how many intelligent people of good will will sift
for the truth and then stand up for it?
I don't know the answer to that -- and so continue putting out the
evidence
with some hope.
By the way -- who else is giving out the truth.
1) The 9-11 investigators are either like John Judge, Sarah Roberts,
Desmoulins and Ron Harvey -- helping the disinformation -- seeking to
hide
and destroy the truth Or
2) they are like Rivero, Ruppert and a 400 others, who give out
everything
but the best evidnece, sins of omission,
everything but the small-plane evidence, everything but the evidence that
can convince the broad public and convince any jury or war crimes tribunal
or crimes against humanity Nuremburg-type trial -- seeking economic
success
and sup****t at the expense of the truth. Or
3) People who avoid taking sides by presenting all sides "impartially"
and
calling themselves members
of the "911 truth community" or "truth movement" -- a society where
everyone must be approved and no one must argue among themselves -- even
though types "1" and "2" are crowding out and attacking as "unsocial" the
truth finders and truth conveyors.
The liars and the silent people and the undiscriminating who take refuge
in
the fog in the cacophony -- seeking approval from all at the expense of
truth (most of you).
I should also mention the silent scared -- who instinctivly know that the
truth is the one that it will hurt to advocate, and so stay silent --
most
of my readers are in this category.
And then there is the few who, against all odds, continue to identify the
evidence that yields the complete truth and to put it out.
Anyone who is jumping up and down for Michael Moore and his owned-man baby
fat I declare to be aiding the enemy -- raising up a phony savior --
just
like Kerry whom Moore is tacitly promoting in this film.
Its time for the truth, kids:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/8
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/3
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solidaritystreet/message/2
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/71
Dick Eastman
Yakima
Fahrenheit 9/11 Nation's Top Grossing Film
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/062904F.shtml
-------
Michael Moore for Eisner saying "Saudis did it" or Dick Eastman with
the
conclusive best evidence of frame-up -- that is the choice this nation
faces -- the choice of intellectual leader****p of resistance money power,
to government by organized crime, the totalitarian warefare debt-slave
state.
================
By the war -- its between Eastman for the truth and Michael Moore for
Eisner -- Michael is covering everything that really would count in a
political showdown -- he is limited hang-out cover-up -- protecting the
Pentagon perpetrators while blaming Moslems and promoting a new war
against
the Saudi Arabians.
But this message is about nails in the coffin of another 911 coverup
agent.
-----------
Several letters follow, all highly instructive to the sincere 911
investigator and concerned citizen
--:
Letter #1:
Tell me Jean-Pierre,
What as a four-engine plane illegally in protected air space and taking
dives over wa****ngton d.c.'s capitol building, what was it doing there at
the very moment the Pentagon was hit by the killer jet?
Why was the C-130 following the Boeing, flying over the Pentagon, actually
through the smoke and flame of the crash just 30 seconds after the
ash -- then, after flying over the crash, next turning left, only to
then
fly over the crash of Flight 93 in Pennsylvania? Pilot O'Brian tells us
all
this -- no one has made it up.
Why were the rescuers prevented from entering the Pentagon? Why did
Rumsfeld himself, the Secretary of Defense, in his office when all three
planes crashed into buildings, why did he not afterwards rush to the
situation room to determine if there were any more planes anywhere else
--
especially since the authoritiy to authorize shootdowns had been made
exclusively his in the Pentagon chain of command? Rumsfeld and a Jewish
Colonel were involved with bringing people out of the Building and giving
them to the firemen at the uncrossable line. Why? Why did Rumsfeld veto
going in to rescue people, saying that no one could be alinve in there?
Why, indeed, if not to make sure that those who were targeted by the
surgical air-strike (not a Boeing) were killed as intended -- the good
men
of the Office of Naval Intelligence, who were loyal to the Consititution
and
would not have sup****ted the lies upon which the frame-up wars were based,
who were intentionally murdered by the neo-cons of the Pentagon to
consolidate their sway of all of American military, intelligence and
national police power.
Why did the air traffic controllers say that the killer jet's blip was
behaving like a military plane?
Why did someone hear a missile, someone hear a jet fighter, someone hear a
sonic boom, someone see tow planes approach the Pentagon together and one
"veer away at the last minute?"
And what about the six hard-established-evidence derived proofs that the
Boeing did not crash into the Pentagon that I provide here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/8
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/3
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solidaritystreet/message/2
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/71
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/messages/1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/78
and all you can do is tell us that
Lagasse or I am lying about the Boeing passing north of him and therefore
passing even further north of the southwest lamppost that was downed by
the
acutal killer jet -- you simple accuse me of lying, now calling me
"Pinnocio" (the puppet who lied) -- exactly as does your co-coverup
partner
Ron Harvey -- the man who lied about what Riskus saw etc. -- you say
that
I made up the Lagasse testimony, when Lagasse himself wrote two letters,
the
second commending me for my honesty and integrety in presenting all that
he
had to say in the first etc. -- me conducting two written interviews and
sharing every word and then me talking to Lagasse on the phone to
carefully
verify that he meant exactly all he said -- which he did -- AND I EVEN,
BACK THEN, PERSONALLY
SUPPLIED YOU WITH LAGASSE'S E-MAIL TO VERIFY YOURSELF
WHAT HE SAID AND YOU DID NOT -- BUT YOU CALL THIS WITNESS
A LIAR AT THE SAME TIME SAYING THAT I ALTERED HIS STATEMENTS
-- YOU JUST ATTACK EVERYONE TO DISCREDIT THE TRUTH YOU MUST
DISCREDIT, DON'T YOU?
And what about the piece of debris planted on the lawn north of the crash
and photographed by Faram 10 minutes after the crash -- which is a piece
that (because of a fragment of lettering, an expanse of bare aluminim skin
that follows the letter, and rivets that line up) could only have come
from
the starboard side of a Boeing 757 (i.e., the seated pilot's right side of
the plane) which side, of the real killer jet, would have faced south not
north -- proving that the agents who were all over the lawn picking up
pieces of debris (what about saving the evidence, boys?? can't have
pieces
of missile casing and pieces of F-16 found, can we?) while one was
actaully
carrying a piece that he put down instead of picking up -- the only piece
of recognizable AA Boineg 757 that was ever seen on the lawn in front of
the
crash -- and that was filmed by three photographers (because it was the
only recognizable airline piece on the lawn -- a lawn that was perfectly
pristine and untouched, whereas parts should have been everywhere --
especially if such violence was done to the plane before it hit the wall
that no starboard engine ever hit the wall!!!!!!
Come on, Desmoulin's you have nothing so far, perhaps you would like to
take a shot at some of these other points -- or do you want more?
It seems that you and Ron Harvey and Michael Moore are the only disinfo
guys
of the year --
but only those who have been denied seeing the small-[lane evidence can be
impressed with your pittiful job of disinformation and cover-up --
and you have not shown me, as I requested, a picture of the wall following
the crash and before the (intentional evidence-concealing) collapse 20
minutes later -- you have not shown me exactly where you say the
starboard
engine hit -- why did you ignore that twice-stated request -- and will
you
ignore this one as well?
Sincerely,
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Wa****ngton
Every man is responsible to every other man.
=========
Letter #2:
From: "John Hs"
To: <TRUTHBAZOOKA@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: [TRUTHBAZOOKA] Re: [frameup] Re: Here is all the fact a jury
needs for 9-11 Rumsfeld treason convinction
> Dick Eastman is right, Desmoulins is lying. Desmoulin's premise and
ongoing 'arguments' are an insult to logic and basic proof-building
intelligence.
>
> He is still trying to distract away from the core issues that he has
failed to successfully lie about. I imagine the evil s*** behind this
plot
are fine-tuning their approach for their next possible "terror" strike on
American soil. Making sure this next terror event is much cleaner, and
possibly more remote - like a nuke reactor. I pray it doesnt happen.
>
> Bush, Rumsfeld, Bush, Sr., etc, etc, etc will all be exposed soon
enough.
i am sickened that i voted for GW Bush. i remember seeing the likes of
some
of Bush, Sr.'s entourage like George Schultz, etc being behind the
"anointing" of George W for President back in 1999 - and it should have
given me more pause. i thought GW Bush was different but i knew he
wouldnt
be when i saw Schultz, Kissinger, etc around GW Bush's camp. He was
picked
as an electable puppet to carry out the dark, evil, and sick agendas of
the
neo-cons. These people are going to fall hard.
>
> Time for a little rebellion in this ol land.
>
> John H
================
John,
I you are the man who spoke up.
With heart felt gratitude,
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Wa****ngton
p.s. I have noticed and often remarked that neither Desmoulins nor Ron
Harvey nor Sarah Roberts -- who all have worked together at various times
in
the past to attack the small-plane thesis
-- NONE OF THEM HAVE EVER SHOWN THE SLIGHTEST INTEREST
IN WHAT REALLY HAPPENED, WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON WITH
THE WAR ON TERROR OR WHAT IS GOING ON IN IRAQ OR
AFGANISTAN -- THEY HAVE JUST SPECIALIZED IN DISCREDITING
THE SMALL-PLANE EVIDENCE !!! WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU?
-- WHEREAS THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF ABSURD FALSE-OPPOSITION
CONSPIRACY THEORIES AT A 100 9-11 SITES THAT THEY NEVER
CHALLENGE!!!! Why focus only on criticizing -- with such disingenuous
contrivance and often outright deceit and trickery! -- against the
small-plane theory, but nothing else is of interest to them -- not Bush,
not Blair, not Kerry, not the French theories -- just the small-plane
thesis week after week, month after month
--TO ME THIS SPEAKS OF OPERATIVES ASSIGNED TO A SPECIFIC
DISINFORMATION ASSIGNMENT: TO BY ANY MEANS POSSIBLE, TO
DISCREDIT THE ONLY EVIDENCE-BASED FINDINGS SUFFICIENT TO
CONVINCE ANY IMPARTIAL GRAND JURY OF THE GUILT OF THE
PENTAGON LEADER****P, i.e., RUMSFELD, WOLFOWITZ, FEITH,
KISSINGER, PERLE, GEN. MYERS ETC.
Again, thanks, John.
|
