Eight items -- organized for interpretive comprehension, not in order of
im****tance (very im****tant news follows the first two essays) -- Dick
Eastman
Item # 1:
On the Term "Anti-Semitic" (with application to the term "self-hating
Jew");
Clarification for those who need it (practically everybody)
by Dick Eastman
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
To say someone is Jewish is assert something about ancestory and cultural
identity/practices (the practice of teaching children, most
rticularly) -- but being Jewish implies nothing about an individual's
current practices, world view or politics -- not every Jew is ever
completely conditioned/programmed by his Jewish mother or Rothschild's
money
and influence etc. -- although these are two of the most legendary human
forces on earth.
To say a man is a Zionist, on the other hand, is to say, unequivocally,
that here is a man who applies a different codes of justice and ethics and
rules of affiliation to Jew and gentile -- here is a man who is enjoying
association in a profitable conspiracy, a highly competitive/aggressive
game
of conquest, a cult of secret warfare and subversion intended to destroy,
plunder and dominate all others not in the club. And yes, they UNFAIRLY
view and represent any criticism of this Zionist orientiation of theirs
as
mortal hostility against Jews and Judaism and Jewishness -- using the
for-that-purpose term "anti-Semiticism" (they never use the term
"anti-Jew"
because that term would be too well defined to make a false accusation
tick -- rather they force the world "anti-Semitic" to function for both
concepts, 'anti-Jew' (Jewish as defined above) and 'anti-Zionist' (Zionist
as defined above) -- Look at Ariel Sharon -- his Jewishness is trivial
(what do Ariel Sharon and Jerry Lewis or the late liberal-libertarian
economist Murray Rothbard have in common, for example), but look at
Sharon's Zionism in full display in this statement:
"I don't know something called International Principles. I vow that I'll
burn every Palestinian child (that) will be born in this area. The
Palestinian woman and child is more dangerous than the man, because the
Palestinian childs existence infers that generations will go on, but the
man
causes limited danger. I vow that if I was just an Israeli civilian and I
met a Palestinian I would burn him and I would make him suffer before
killing him. With one hit I've killed 750 Palestinians (in Rafah in 1956).
I
wanted to encourage my soldiers by raping Arabic girls as the Palestinian
women is a slave for Jews, and we do whatever we want to her and nobody
tells us what we shall do but we tell others what they shall do." [Ariel
Sharon, current Prime Minister, In an interview with General Ouze Merham,
1956]
and don't think for a moment that this attitude and the fact that Sharon
has carried an automatic rifle since he was age 14 is not his qualifier as
a
great man and leader of the cause among Zionists in the Likud party, in
boardrooms in the the City, New York, Hollywood, Miami, Singa****e, Hong
Kong, Frankfort, Paris, Geneva etc.
Or take the ADL -- which does its best to agitate and scare up --
through
various provocateur strategies -- anger which it can then
propagandistically
transmute into the capital of "anti-Semiticism" to show rich Hollywood or
New York paranoid rich guys, telling them that Nazis are out to get them,
etc. and that they must turn over millions of dollars a year to conduct
counter-operations to hold back the wave of "anti_semiticism that is
always
on the verge of initiating pogroms or even firing up the ovens and
novelty
lampshade factories etc.
And so with only one word, anti-Semiticism, to describe both a)
articulate and active hostility towards everyone Jewish on the one hand
and
b) opposition to the racist criminal conspiracy that perpetually works the
dialectic of troublemaking to destroy everything and everyone not owned or
dominated by Zionists, including the perpetration of the 9-11 mass-murder
frame-up to provoke the wars and mass killing and plunder of Moslem
lands we are enjoying now -- means that even intelligent and
informed men of good will, seeking what is best for all people, regardless
of race or religion or even politics -- will be confounded with
dim-witted
anti-social thugs, the racist suppremacists who want to do injustice to
Jews.
My name is Dick Eastman, I am anti-Zionist. To the accusation that I am
"anti-Semitic" I say that the term is too poorly defined to have meaning,
but that whatever I am, I know for sure that 911 was a mass-murder
frame-up
conducted by a group of Zionist Jews running the Pentagon -- on the basis
of the fact that these leaders participated in denying and covering-up the
fact that no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon -- that from the very first they
"acted the coverup" as well as engineered the standdown of our defenses.
My proof is overwhelmingly conclusive and compelling, with multiple lines
of
evidence, each apodictically establi****ng the fact of the 911 false-flag
inside-job black-op at the Pentagon, one of the five most monstrous
crimes
in American history.
http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/8
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/3
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/507
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/71
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/Eastman/m18h05.html
http://www.911-strike.com/pentagon-all.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/messages/1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/78
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solidaritystreet/message/2
Dick Eastman
223 S. 64th Ave.
Yakima, Wa****ngton
Item #2:
IF THE SITUATION WERE REVERSED
By Gideon Levy
Jewish Journal, Opinion
July 30, 2004 Issue
What would happen if a Palestinian terrorist were to detonate a bomb at
the
entrance to an apartment building in Israel and cause the death of an
elderly man in a wheelchair, who would later be found buried under the
rubble of the building? The country would be profoundly shocked. Everyone
would talk about the sickening cruelty of the act and its perpetrators.
The
shock would be even greater if it then turned out that the dead man's wife
had tried to dissuade the terrorist from blowing up the house, telling him
that there were people inside, but to no avail. The tabloids would come
out with the usual screaming headline: "Buried alive in his wheelchair."
The terrorists would be branded "animals."
Last Monday, Israel Defense Forces (IDF) bulldozers in Khan Yunis, in the
Gaza Strip, demolished the home of Ibrahim Halfalla, a 75-year-old
disabled
man and father of seven, and buried him alive. Umm-Basel, his wife, says
she
tried to stop the driver of the heavy machine by shouting, but he paid her
no heed. The IDF termed the act "a mistake that shouldn't have happened,"
and the incident was noted in passing in Israel. The country's
largest-circulation paper, Yedioth Ahronoth, didn't bother to run the
story
at all. The blood libel in France - a woman's tale of being subjected to
an
anti-Semitic attack, which later turned out to be fiction - proved a great
deal more upsetting to people. There we thought the assault was aimed
against our people. But when the IDF bulldozes a disabled Palestinian to
death? Not a story. Just like the killing, under the rubble of her home,
of
Noha Maqadama, a woman in her ninth month of pregnancy, before the eyes of
her husband and children, in El Boureij refugee camp a few months earlier.
And what would happen if a Palestinian were to shoot an Israeli university
lecturer and his son in front of his wife and their young son? That's what
happened 10 days ago in the case of Dr. Salem Khaled, from Nablus, who
called to the soldiers from the window of his house because he was a man
of
peace and the front door had jammed, so he couldn't get out. The soldiers
shot him to death and then killed his 16-year-old son before the eyes of
his
mother and his 11-year-old brother. It's not hard to imagine how we would
react to the story if the victims were ours.
But when we're implicated and the victims are Palestinians, we prefer to
avert our eyes, not to know, not to take an interest and certainly not to
be
shocked. Palestinian victims - and their numbers, as everyone knows, are
far
greater than ours - don't even merit newspaper re****ts, not even when the
chain of events is particularly brutal, as in the examples given. This is
not an intellectual exercise but an attempt to demonstrate the concealment
of information, the double morality and the hypocrisy. The indifference to
these two very recent incidents proved again that in our eyes there is
only
one victim and all the others will never be considered victims.
If a European cabinet minister were to declare, "I don't want these
long-nosed Jews to serve me in restaurants," all of Europe would be up in
arms and this would be the minister's last comment as a minister. Three
years ago, our former labor and social affairs minister, Shlomo Benizri,
from Shas, stated: "I can't understand why slanty-eyed types should be the
ones to serve me in restaurants." Nothing happened. We are allowed to be
racists. And if a European government were to announce that Jews are not
permitted to attend Christian schools? The Jewish world would rise up in
protest. But when our Education Ministry announces that it will not permit
Arabs to attend Jewish schools in Haifa, it's not considered racism. Only
in
Israel could this not be labeled racist. The heritage of Golda Meir - it
was
she who said that after what the Nazis did to us, we can do whatever we
want - is now having a late and unfortunate revival.
What would happen if a certain country were to enact legislation
forbidding
members of a particular nation to become citizens there, no matter what
the
cir***stances, including mixed couples who married and raised families? No
country anywhere enacts laws like these nowadays, apart from Israel. If
the
Cabinet extends the validity of the new citizen****p law today,
Palestinians
will not be able to undergo naturalization here, even if they are married
to
Israelis. We have the right, you see. And if the illegal Israeli
immigrants
in the United States were hunted down like animals in the dark of night,
the
way the Immigration Police do here, would we have a better understanding
of
the injustice we are doing to a community that wants nothing other than to
work here?
What would we say if the parents of Israeli emigrants were separated from
their children and de****ted, without having available any avenue of
naturalization, no matter what the cir***stances? And how would we
classify
a country that interrogates visitors about their political opinions as
soon
as they disembark from the plane at the air****t and bars them from
entering
it the security authorities look askance at the opinions they express?
What
would happen if anti-Semites in France were to poison the drinking water
of
a Jewish neighborhood? Last week settlers poisoned a well at Atawana, in
the southern Mount
Hebron region, and the police are investigating.
And we still haven't said anything about a country that would imprison
another nation, or about a regime that would prevent access to medical
treatment for some of its subjects, according to its national identity,
about roads that would be open only to the members of one nation or about
an
air****t that would be closed to the other nation. All this is happening in
Israel and is pulling from under us the moral ground that makes it
possible
for us to complain about racism and anti Semitism abroad, even when they
actually erupt.
Gideon Levy writes for Haaretz.
Item # 3:
Comments made by Marine Cpl. Abdul Henderson in Michael Moore's
controversial film "Fahrenheit 9/11" prompted the Marine's commanders to
look into the appropriateness of his film debut. Henderson, a reservist
with the 3rd Air Naval Gunfire Liaison Company out of Long Beach, Calif.,
was featured, wearing his service dress Alpha uniform, alongside Moore
outside the U.S. Capitol as the pair unsuccessfully solicited legislators
to
enlist their children into the U.S. military and to fight in the war in
Iraq.
http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=23542
Item # 4:
Investigations into the killing of Iraqi civilians by British troops are
fundamentally flawed, the high court heard yesterday. Many have not even
resulted in autopsies of the victims.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1272525,00.html
Item # 5:
The first criminal trials of Guantanamo inmates will be launched on 23
August, US officials said, following the the review tribunals for
detainees
held by the US military at Guantanamo Bay to review that status of
prisoners
held in the constitutional unprotected status of enemy combatants
convened
to head off due process challenges to a Supreme Court not anxious for
another "Election 2000" blow to its presitge as a lacky upholder
globalist
policy come what may.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3916987.stm
Item #6:
British ministers of Parliament have secretly agreed to a "softly-softly"
approach towards Afghan drug lords, causing cheap heroin to flood into
Britain, leaked cabinet do***ents have revealed.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,2761-1198087,00.html
Item # 7:
British Army officers blocked police investigations into the deaths of
more
than 20 Iraqis during incidents involving British troops, raising concerns
about the Army's right to stop inquiries into fatal shootings.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=546764
Item # 8 a & b:
A totally new kind of freedom in Iraq: A Sunday Herald investigation has
discovered that coalition forces are holding more than 100 children in
jails
such as Abu Ghraib. Witnesses claim that the detainees - some as young as
10 - are also being subjected to rape and torture
http://www.sundayherald.com/43796
BRITISH forces are arresting children in Iraq and handing them to US
forces
(and Israeli interrogation experts) who interrogate and detain them
indefinitely in prisons including the notorious Abu Ghraib.
http://www.sundayherald.com/43773
|
