Dear fellow discussants,
My name is Dick Eastman. Since March of 2002 I have been compiling
evidence
pertaining to the attack on the Pentagon of September 11, 2001. Out of
thousands of photos and witness accounts I have isolated the critical
pictures and statements that actually test the claim that a Boeing 757
crashed into the Pentagon. My finding is that in every instance the lines
of photo and witness evidence establish conclusively that the claim of a
Boeing crash is inconsistent with the known facts. You may examine this
evidence and verify my conclusions at any of these sites:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/8
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/3
http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
http://www.globalfreepress.com/ewing2001/911/1.shtml
http://www.911-strike.com/pentagon-all.htm
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/Eastman/m18h05.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/507
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/71
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/messages/1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/78
The verifiable conclusion that military aircraft and at least one missile
took part in a surgical strike against particular offices newly assigned
to
the refurbished wedge of the Pentagon is not trivial. The fact of the
concerted deception immediatly implicates the Bush administration because
it
implies the complicit participation of Secretary of Defense Donald
Rumsfeld
and the Assistant Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and attaches strong
suspicion to individuals working closely at the Pentagon with Paul
Wolfowitz, viz., Richard Perle, Richard Cheney, Henry Kissinger, Feith,
and
Newt Gingrich. Furthermore, examination of this list reveals these
commonalities: each is a "neo-conservative" and each, except Newt
Gingrich,
is a Jewish Zionist. Kissinger and Gingrich have ties to the Rockefeller
interests and Richard Perle has ties to the Rothschild interests. This
group demography too has its implications about the author****p and intent
of
the entire 911 crime.
The question we must now examine is this: given that we have isolated the
best evidence in the 911 attack, evidence which firmly establishes the
true
nature of that attack and points a decided finger at individuals who must
have comprised a directive leader****p in the crime, why has not even the
existence of this collection of evidence been brought to the attention of
the general public, to American law enforcement, to Congress and to the
those international bodies which by treaty have been given responsibility
in
investigate war crimes, and crimes against humanity?
In my efforts to bring this information to the attention of the public and
in the efforts of others I know who are also seeking to inform people that
the 911 case has been solved, I have found two barriers: a wall of the
hollow ridicule of an army of internet operatives and a wall of silence
and
non-response from the established institutions of media and government
that
normally are expected to respond to verified fact of such far-reaching
im****tance.
Even those whose reputation has been made as independent investigators of
government wrongdoing have participated in the above mentioned wall of
silence. Mike Rivero and Mike Ruppert are, I find, to examples of this.
Despite every effort on my part to bring the critical evidence to their
attention I have been met with silence, with no reply. I have been forced
to ask why this is so.
In the case of Mike Rivero and Mike Ruppert I think I have found the
answer.
It is a simple answer. These men began as champions of the truth and
justice -- Mike Rivero gaining my intial respect for his tireless pursuit
of the truth in the TWA crash scandal and Mike Ruppert, I understand,
gaining a reputation for exposing drug trafficking by the CIA. Naturally
people looked to these two men for leader****p in getting to the truth
about
911. Mike Ruppert launced his career as the leading spokesman for 911
investigation when he addressed a large college audience shortly after
the
September 11 crime. However both Ruppert and Rivero have tried to make
money from their investigative and information service efforts. Ruppert
has
succeded very well in doing this. And it is because of this attempt to
make
money as a servant of the truth that both men, in my opinon, have gone
wrong.
The rule is that when the great champion for truth starts taking
contributions from sponsors he will invariably end up the mouthpiece bozo
on
retainer to the rich men -- he should perhaps be investigating or else
rich
men who have an interest in seeing that the whole truth is not revealed.
As
I have often said, based on my attempts to get through to him and on my
observation of his "business" from a distance, it is my considered opinion
that Mike Ruppert has sold out, that he appears to be, as I have often
taunted him in the hope of shameing him into engaging the Pentagon
vidence -- a "cop on the take."
I welcome his lawsuit as a means of breaking the barrier to the progress
of
the Pentagon evidence that he and his business have presented.
I hope you all will follow the progress of the trial that is to come.
Dick Eastman
223 S. 64th Ave.
Yakima, Wa****ngton 98908
|
