In article <cf0d3p$s1t$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, silver@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> Dear fellow discussants,
>
> My name is Dick Eastman. Since March of 2002 I have been compiling
evidence
> pertaining to the attack on the Pentagon of September 11, 2001. Out of
> thousands of photos and witness accounts I have isolated the critical
> pictures and statements that actually test the claim that a Boeing 757
> crashed into the Pentagon. My finding is that in every instance the
lines
> of photo and witness evidence establish conclusively that the claim of a
> Boeing crash is inconsistent with the known facts. You may examine this
> evidence and verify my conclusions at any of these sites:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/8
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/3
>
> http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
>
> http://www.globalfreepress.com/ewing2001/911/1.shtml
>
> http://www.911-strike.com/pentagon-all.htm
>
> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/Eastman/m18h05.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/507
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/71
>
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/messages/1
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/78
>
>
> The verifiable conclusion that military aircraft and at least one
missile
> took part in a surgical strike against particular offices newly assigned
to
> the refurbished wedge of the Pentagon is not trivial. The fact of the
> concerted deception immediatly implicates the Bush administration
because it
> implies the complicit participation of Secretary of Defense Donald
Rumsfeld
> and the Assistant Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and attaches
strong
> suspicion to individuals working closely at the Pentagon with Paul
> Wolfowitz, viz., Richard Perle, Richard Cheney, Henry Kissinger, Feith,
and
> Newt Gingrich. Furthermore, examination of this list reveals these
> commonalities: each is a "neo-conservative" and each, except Newt
Gingrich,
> is a Jewish Zionist. Kissinger and Gingrich have ties to the
Rockefeller
> interests and Richard Perle has ties to the Rothschild interests. This
> group demography too has its implications about the author****p and
intent of
> the entire 911 crime.
>
> The question we must now examine is this: given that we have isolated
the
> best evidence in the 911 attack, evidence which firmly establishes the
true
> nature of that attack and points a decided finger at individuals who
must
> have comprised a directive leader****p in the crime, why has not even the
> existence of this collection of evidence been brought to the attention
of
> the general public, to American law enforcement, to Congress and to the
> those international bodies which by treaty have been given
responsibility in
> investigate war crimes, and crimes against humanity?
>
> In my efforts to bring this information to the attention of the public
and
> in the efforts of others I know who are also seeking to inform people
that
> the 911 case has been solved, I have found two barriers: a wall of the
> hollow ridicule of an army of internet operatives and a wall of silence
and
> non-response from the established institutions of media and government
that
> normally are expected to respond to verified fact of such far-reaching
> im****tance.
>
> Even those whose reputation has been made as independent investigators
of
> government wrongdoing have participated in the above mentioned wall of
> silence. Mike Rivero and Mike Ruppert are, I find, to examples of this.
> Despite every effort on my part to bring the critical evidence to their
> attention I have been met with silence, with no reply. I have been
forced
> to ask why this is so.
>
> In the case of Mike Rivero and Mike Ruppert I think I have found the
answer.
> It is a simple answer. These men began as champions of the truth and
> justice -- Mike Rivero gaining my intial respect for his tireless
pursuit
> of the truth in the TWA crash scandal and Mike Ruppert, I understand,
> gaining a reputation for exposing drug trafficking by the CIA.
Naturally
> people looked to these two men for leader****p in getting to the truth
about
> 911. Mike Ruppert launced his career as the leading spokesman for 911
> investigation when he addressed a large college audience shortly after
the
> September 11 crime. However both Ruppert and Rivero have tried to make
> money from their investigative and information service efforts. Ruppert
has
> succeded very well in doing this. And it is because of this attempt to
make
> money as a servant of the truth that both men, in my opinon, have gone
> wrong.
>
> The rule is that when the great champion for truth starts taking
> contributions from sponsors he will invariably end up the mouthpiece
bozo on
> retainer to the rich men -- he should perhaps be investigating or else
rich
> men who have an interest in seeing that the whole truth is not revealed.
As
> I have often said, based on my attempts to get through to him and on my
> observation of his "business" from a distance, it is my considered
opinion
> that Mike Ruppert has sold out, that he appears to be, as I have often
> taunted him in the hope of shameing him into engaging the Pentagon
> vidence -- a "cop on the take."
>
> I welcome his lawsuit as a means of breaking the barrier to the progress
of
> the Pentagon evidence that he and his business have presented.
>
> I hope you all will follow the progress of the trial that is to come.
>
> Dick Eastman
> 223 S. 64th Ave.
> Yakima, Wa****ngton 98908
>
>
>
Um, might this trial be called a "sanity hearing" or in most states, a
"Competantcy hearing"?? If so, you're dead meat Dickie....
LOL-Picturing the men putting on your "special magical white jacket,
complete with crotch strap", and dragging you away while you shout all
your Pentagon theories..
Soon, the needle goes in, and you are off to the twilight zone...
Wish I could be there Dickie..
BDK
|
