"Bob Casanova" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:c6onv3t6oak3sl8e21e3gbblugors95p3q@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:52:55 -0400, the following appeared in
> sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel/Messenger" <X>:
>
>>
>>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:fb5lv3tb9qr8h5fvudlk9qlhk2rboreepo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:23:32 -0400, the following appeared in
>>> sci.skeptic, posted by "KING_FOLP" <KING_FOLP@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>>>
>>>>Revenue and Technology of Clandestine Organizations
>>>
>>> Thanks, but the stuff you want is known as lithium
>>> carbonate.
>>
>>You're great at giving out 'Scripts'........
>>
>>"Wanna **** with me? Show your **** at *MY* newsgroup.
>>rec.aviation.piloting...."
>> (Dan <danmc61@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>)
>>
>>So I did, for you Bob.......show your ****....bull......
>
> What about the fact that Dan and I are two different people
> is confusing you?
What you just aksed me is.....confusing.....
>
> <snip blather>
>
>>> "Evidence confirming an observation is
>>> evidence that the observation is wrong."
>
>>So nothing is right.....
>
> What is confusing you about the quote by McCoy? He's an
> idiot, which should be obvious from the quote, and rejects
> evidence regarding science, particularly evolution, in favor
> of his pet beliefs. Sound familiar?
Yeah....like you.....I shove science at you all the time...
Like genetics.....you reject it, all of the time.......
You seem to think I'm confused about everything.....!
>
>>Therefore you can snip everything and make a dumbass
>>comment. Drug induced.....
>
> I only snip irrelevant garbage, whether said garbage was
> drug induced or merely the product of the sort of mind that
> rejects reality and substitutes wishful thinking.
>
>>- McNameless
>>
>>No it's not. It has your name on it.....
>
> Not hardly; I accept evidence sup****ting conjectures as
> tending to confirm the conjectures, unlike McCoy
> (McNameless). Note that that's *evidence*, not further
> assertions and conjectures. Apparently this concept gives
> you trouble.
99.5+% Neanderthal genome is a good argument for
hybridization of (y)our species. You have trouble with
that concept.......
What about that pole ****ft 2012....it seems like a gradual
getting there......
"Weather and earthquakes as man has never seen before."
(Apocalypse)
It's going to get worse, before it gets better......
> --
>
> Bob C.
>
> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> - McNameless
~>
Twonky.....
Hybrid Angel/Messenger
DST puts the Earth out of synch with rest of the
Solar System, a subtle affect, on body & psyche.....
|
