Re: 2005 pics

docx+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Dylan Northrup) wrote in
news:gIWdnZUQaMuKlIPeRVn-tQ@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> 
> It also meant the Hyatt wasn't so friggin full of people that you
> couldn't move around.  Personally, I'd prefer photos in designated
> areas and let the rest of the convention floor to people who actually
> want to walk around. But that may just be me.


I understand the stated reasons for the ban but as a 16 year vet of D*C I 
reserve the right to be pissed. I go to D*C for autographs and pictures. 
The lack of coordination of the security staff was irritating. They kept 
changeing the rules about when and where you could take pix. As usual, Mad

Dog seemed to be the only rational security team leader.

All the people sitting on the floor outside the ball room were as much a 
hinderance as the photographers. But no over zelous security guards ran at

them shouting " No sitting! No sitting!"

A lot of cons have designated photo areas, D*C has had them in the past.
The stage area outside of Centennial Ball room would have been a good 
photo area when no bands were playing, instead it was all ways full of
kids 
kicking a hacky-sack around and into the crowd.