Re: Dweomer, etc.

On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 19:46:47 +0300, Morgil <morestelx@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>David Johnston kirjoitti:
>> On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:02:52 +0300, Morgil <morestelx@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Matt Frisch kirjoitti:
>>>
>>>
>>>>If the over-obsessed Tolkein freaks believed that a vague narrative
could
>>>>be turned into a detailed movie without making changes, maybe they
>>>>shouldn't have watched it.
>>>
>>>I don't think anyone believed that. Do you know someone who did?
>> 
>> 
>> Obviously there were a lot of people who believed that since many
>> people have complained about an adaptation that is about as good as a
>> Hollywood adaptation can get.  
>
>I'm afraid your comment goes completely beside the point.
>The question was not wheter the adaption was good or bad
>or if a Hollywood adaption could have been any better,
>but if there was anyone who believed that the LotR could
>be turned into a detailed movie without making changes.
>
>It's quite a simple, straightforward question, so I don't
>really understand why you need to bring up such issues as
>the general quality of Hollywood adaptions to confuse it...

Why would people complain about existence of changes if they didn't
think it was possible to avoid changes?  

>
>Morgil