Re: Dweomer,etc.

On 2007-07-11 09:07:32 -0400, Larry Swain <theswain@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:

> Tom Hook wrote:
>> On 2007-07-10 17:37:38 -0400, Dan Clore <clore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
said:
>> 
>>> Larry Swain wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> I doubt that anything else is worth bothering with at this point.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Indeed, you're a waste of time.  Not only can you not write clearly, 
>>>> you haven't the basic literacy skills, and when you're failure is 
>>>> pointed out to you, you imply that your respondant is a liar.  Truly,

>>>> you are not worth bothering with any further.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Something about the above impresses me.
>> 
>> 
>> This argument is entertaining up to a point for any of us who know 
>> better than to take it seriously. That said, my vote goes to Clore 
>> because Swain is nothing more than a pretentious jackass who seems to 
>> think that what he says is something more than empty academic
yammering.
> 
> Ah yes, that's using the ol' intellect to make judgements....good 
> choice, Clore is the anti-intellectual fool's choice, so if you fit 
> that group, choose Clore.  Thanks Tom for putting up the standard for 
> your special team.

Larry

When faced with a towering intellect such as your own, I am left little 
choice but to fall back on my feelings to make judgements and hope that 
my gut does not prove me wrong. Whenever you make a post (I first 
noticed this a few months ago), there is an aggressive rancor that 
eventually seeps out from every ****e of your body of "work" and I 
"feel" it first and foremost before anything else comes into play. I 
don't know what bug has crawled up your ass but I suggest you take a 
more careful look next time you're up there. Maybe a little 
self-reflection can get rid of the infestation and you can then begin 
to play nice. It's what we anti-intellectuals call an attitude 
adjustment.

Godspeed

Tom