Where would the entertainment world be without stupid ****s like this
to laugh at? Sometimes it's a shame that civilization brought an end
to drowning idiots while they're still young....
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 21:30:21 -0600, Leader of the Free World
<leader_of_the_free_world@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>[THIS VERSION HAS BEEN HUGELY SNPD]
>
> LET IT BE KNOWN
> Propagandized stupider than the fates will allow
>
>Let it be known, that the senior management national news
>reducers of CBC and CNN, know full well, they would rather
>watch American Soldiers die as the thieving bad guys, than to
>defend God's America by re****ting that the demon enemy George
>W. Bush, and his business partner General Ahmad, committed
>the terrorist acts of 9/11, along with Rumsfeld, Rice, Cheney,
>and Myers.
>
>We shall, start there, and continue on until we've nabbed
>every last treasonous culprit found at the ends of the ample
>crimes scene leads. Propagandized stupider than the fates
>will allow, an American is universally recognizing itself as
>an enemy to their own cowardly dying selves. For, my friend,
>America's America will not stand undefended with these beliefs
>of mine I give freely. Soldiers along with honorable Police
>officers I would ask, to bravely/politely demand our time
>on national broadcasts for the spoken defense of Justice for
>America. For, Johnny wants to debate the bu****e publicly on
>the validity of the Iraq war, considering that it has no true
>justifiable cause. Meaning: all stolen revenues will be
>returned to the Iraqi people, with interest, paid for by those
>responsible for stealing it. Justice Johnny has now
>officially arrived on the scene to hunt bu****e down to the
>ends of life - to teach'em with kind words, or the other way
>with graver sentences handed down by us believers in freedom
>from tyranny. Hint: Don't ---- with the real Children of God
>who are refusing to take more chances with enemy bu****e
>neo-con bull****. An innocent person shall not be imprisoned
>in my name, nor shall they be tortured, robbed, or murdered.
>Bu****e enemies that don't like that arrangement, we arrest,
>try, and if convicted on the war crime capital offenses of
>first degree mass murder, such as we will find regarding
>Mattis, Blount, Russell, and Sattler, Allawi and Doud, then,
>and only then, we together will joyously have them publicly
>executed for the good of the entire body politic. In the
>name of Jesus, Allah has spoken for life in which all are
>granted equal privilege to love with everything we are
>together alone with the stars. Death to the ungodly bu****e,
>instead of the innocent they target for plunder with
>treasonous lies as a betrayal to our real names.
>
>God, Johnny, You, and the Great America.
>
>
>http://istanbul.indymedia.org/uploads/death_trap_-_a_frank_talk_on_the_true_nature_of_the_evil_demon_antichrist.mp3
>
>http://www.chapelhill.indymedia.org/uploads/bu****e-kills-bu****e.mp3
>
>---
>
>Realize, CNN and CBC have received this post, yet, continue to
>lie to dying soldiers for the unholy benefit of the enemy
>neo-con.
>
>http://sydney.indymedia.org/local/webcast/uploads/metafiles/thanks-for-listening_-_johnny_wizard.mp3
>
>
>The "Shock and Awe" Gallery©
>http://www.marchforjustice.com/shock&awe.php
>
>/ / "The children seem to be the most openly enthused.
>They are getting a chance at a future the likes of which
>would never have been possible under the oppressive
>regime..." \ \
>
>http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3
>
>---
>
>When we cancel other people's human rights, we cancel our own.
>
>= Highwater =
>
>
>---
>
> The Verdict
>
>The Winnipeg Police Department is running a fencing operation
>out of their "Exploitation" Unit. Disclosed by a current
>serving officer in the Unit during the preliminary. In one
>case used as an example, a law abiding Winnipeg business owner
>had 50,000 dollars worth of business equipment stolen, and if
>he wanted it back, he would have to make costly "legal"
>efforts through a corrupted Justice system in Winnipeg that
>holds Canadian Soldiers in complete contempt by "Law". The
>Crown has not only refusing to co-operate with defending
>Winnipeg citizenry, in relation****p to the, National problem
>of fencing through bad lawed Police action operations, and the
>lotteries [information forwarded in part by the elected
>Premier of our Province], but also, in respect to our
>sacrificing soldiers. Soldiers who Canada now knows without
>shadow of doubt, are being maliciously propagandized through
>the cor****ate mouth pieces of the most heinous war criminal of
>history, the ungodly enemy of Creation responsible for
>instituting the terrorist crimes of 9/11. Obstructing Justice
>by aiding and abetting the terrorist crimes of first degree
>mass murder in New York City is suppose to be a serious
>offence in Canada. So, as treasonous to Canadian Liberty, the
>Crown in my case is refusing to have the police chief, or
>other Crowns look into this matter. [I suggested by my Court
>motion to our Court system to consider contacting another
>office from a different province perhaps.] While the Judge,
>publicly for the Winnipeg record, agreed to side with the
>Crown instead, without stating the whys - that Justice for
>Canada would not be served under his rule on my suggestion.
>Just put a soldier in prison if they should dare stand up in
>defense with their lives for Canada is what this unjust case,
>yet to be re****ted on by our national press, is turning out to
>be actually. I would ask you once again, to please make some
>effort to get on local Winnipeg Radio, or Coast to Coast to
>plead for some defense on this matter of morality. You know,
>this Freedom thing does involve you too. So, George Norrie
>and the rest of you lot, listen, I think you've made some
>horrible judgment calls, and I'm asking you now, to live up
>to your responsibilities to my America, and invite me on for
>free discussions on these matters.
>
>All I want is to challenge the man.
>
>
>Merci.
>
>P.S. Maybe Harper won't be so bad... Doh!
>
>
>---
>
> A Soldier's Life Held in Contempt
>
>
>The way I see it, is that I am completely do***ented correct
>on who was responsible for the terrorist crimes of 9/11. I
>have my own theories on why our media and police services have
>failed our Soldiers by refusing to sup****t my cause directly
>thus far, but I am far without hope.
>
>I believe the failures of me gaining direct wide sup****t
>through our police services and the Court of Queen’s Bench, is
>much more so for fear of uncertainty, and lack of leader****p,
>than a general, across the board sup****t of furthering Bush’s
>war crime sprees by going still silent while Canadian soldiers
>are left forsaken. I speak out publicly often regarding the
>911 evidence in America, and email campaigns of my writings,
>done for public recognition, I’m told, continue to swell to
>near epic pro****tions. Intelligence officers the world over
>most certainly know of my position on this matter. Those who
>may sup****t the fight for Bush rule in our police services,
>can mostly only do so, risking in dishonorable blind personal
>fear of the great unknown I figure. And, crazy as this may
>sound, I believe there is a spooky cool God, for I’m walking a
>groove most all of the time.
>
>
>The affidavit that starts “1. National Security Issues” was
>submitted in conjunction with my motion to request assistance
>from the Court. The additional paper “Stand Together or
>Don’t”, was an added part of the same affidavit.
>
>The affidavit with 38 positions was submitted with the two
>motions, “Order of Production” and “for the Crown to Stay
>Proceedings”. Duplicate copies of the same affidavit were
>submitted in each respect.
>
>
>
>----
>
>http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html
>
>"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted
>Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.
>11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban."
>
>This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through
>prior experiences of Muslim fundamentalists, such as the
>Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to
>persecute the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only
>needing to do, and had officially done, was to use no evidence
>to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a
>result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not
>follow the crime scene leads at the real murder scene to nab
>to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret
>plot.
>
>
>--
>
>/ / In another characteristic incident, Bush asserted, as he
>has repeatedly, that any decision on withdrawal of American
>troops from Iraq "will be made by military commanders, not by
>politicians in Wa****ngton DC." Congressional Republicans gave
>a standing ovation to this remark, which amounts to a
>declaration that, in the war for "freedom" and "democracy" in
>Iraq, there is no room for such trifles as control over the
>military by the civilian authorities, and subordination of
>decisions on war and peace to the democratic will of the
>American people. \ \
>
>Exactly. The demon enemy of life itself, Our Mr. bush Jnr.,
>who publicly parades his contempt for freedom and God, must
>be stopped for all costs, that include for sure, your own
>as reader.
>
>http://jerusalem.indymedia.org/uploads/guilty_of_innocence.mp3
>
>Realize, CNN and CBC have received this post, yet, continue to
>lie to dying soldiers for the benefit of the enemy neo-con.
>
>
>http://www.indybay.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3
>
>http://newmexico.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/01/news-tunes.mp3
>
>These are the motions than were filed on behalf of Johnny
>Wizard's defense in Winnipeg. A man arrested for threatening the
>continuing existence of the lawless demon anti-Christ, Our Mr.
>bush Jnr. The demon nazi who murdered thousands in New York
>City as God's enemy. I, beg and plead my case to ALL that
>will listen. The tyrannies of suffering on our God happen
>when good people go silent in the face of evil. Please do not
>forsake all that is good within yourself, by leaving my call
>unheard from.
>
>---
>
>/ / Color me naive, but when I hear talk of cages, detention
>and/or concentration camps, my mind usually wonders in devious
>directions. I haven't seen anywhere in history where detention
>centers and so forth were used as freedom enhancing tools.
>View this anyway you wish, but do so at your own peril. \ \
>
>--------
>
>AFFIDAVIT
>
>AFFIDAVIT OF JOHNNY WIZARD
>
>
>I, Johnny Wizard, in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba
>MAKE OATH AND SAY:
>
>
>1.
>
>Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire
>transfer about $100,000 to hijacker Atta. Ahmad later resigns
>after the transfer is disclosed in India and confirmed by the
>FBI. [Dawn, 10/8/01, Times of India, 10/9/01, Wall Street
>Journal, 10/10/01, AFP, 10/10/01] The individual who makes the
>wire transfer at Ahmad's direction is Saeed Sheikh, later
>convinced for kidnapping and murdering re****ter Daniel Pearl
>in February 2002. ABC News later re****ts, "federal
>authorities have told ABC News they've now tracked more than
>$100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in Florida to
>accounts held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta."
>[ABC News, 9/30/01] CNN also re****ts the $100,000 transfer,
>and the New York Times specifies that it came in 2000. [CNN,
>10/1/01, CNN, 10/6/01, New York Times, 7/10/02] Ahmad's order
>must have preceded June 2000, since that's when Atta and
>others started opening bank accounts and receiving the money
>($109,910 is received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi between June
>19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12/11/01]
>
>2.
>
>On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski re****ted that he
>had received anonymously, top secret presidential war strategy
>do***ents dated September 9th, 2001, originating from
>Condolezza's office, outlining a strategy to invade
>Afghanistan premised on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but
>providing no evidence to back up the allegations, thereby
>guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only workable if Laden pleads
>innocence to a crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime
>serious enough to "justify" sacrificing American GIs truly for
>a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving Enron.
>["The Dahbol Working Group" and Bridas] Any evidence for any
>offense would have been sufficient to have Muslim
>fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had
>offered [as others of other nations had also] repeatedly
>during the Clinton years.
>
>CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do
>any follow up on the intelligence, deciding instead on behalf
>of dying people everywhere, our public devolvement of a just
>society.
>
>3.
>
>RTÉ News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls
>21 September 2001 17:41
>
>The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's
>ruling Taliban for proof that Osama bin Laden was responsible
>for last week's attacks. According to the US Secretary of
>State, Colin Powell, the United States has enough evidence to
>try bin Laden in an American court.
>
>The US Government said there would be no negotiations.
>
>
>
>
>4.
>
>[This following do***ent was the official damning account]
>
>Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States
>4 October 2001
>http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/page3554.asp
>
>[This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's]
>
>"This do***ent does not pur****t to provide a prosecutable case
>against Usama Bin Laden in a court of law."
>
>The do***ent doesn’t hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See?
>
>5.
>
>Investigating the Investigation
>http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17816
>
>After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked
>Daschle, "Did the vice president call you and urge you not to
>investigate the events of Sept. 11?" Daschle flatly
>contradicted Cheney: "Yes, he did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then
>on Jan. 28 the president himself at one of our breakfast
>meetings repeated the request."
>
>...."[T]hat request was made" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24
>and by Mr. Bush four days later, but "on other dates
>following" as well.
>
>6.
>
>ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations
>http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021219.html
>
>Two veteran FBI investigators say they were ordered to stop
>investigations into a suspected terror cell linked to Osama
>bin Laden's al Qaeda network and the Sept. 11 attacks...
>
>`You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations'
>
>7.
>
>October 9 2001 - The Times of India
>
>"While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed
>that former ISI [the "Pakistani CIA"] director-general Lt-Gen
>Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement after being superseded on
>Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed
>here on Tuesday that the general lost his job because of the
>"evidence" India produced to show his links to one of the
>suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Center. The U.S.
>authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that
>$100,000 were wired to WTC hijacker Mohammed Atta from
>Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh [Omar Saeed] at the instance of
>General Mahmud [Ahmad]. Senior government sources have
>confirmed that India contributed significantly to establi****ng
>the link between the money transfer and the role played by the
>dismissed ISI chief. While they did not provide details, they
>said that Indian inputs, including [Omar Saeed's] mobile phone
>number, helped the FBI in tracing and establi****ng the link."
>
>
>
>
>8.
>
>No evidence was brought against Laden for nine eleven, none.
>[So according to Bush's official top secret Presidential
>directives] While Laden himself claimed he played no part in
>911. Still, to save the lives of third worlders on the brink
>of starvation, Laden agreed to hand himself over, but Bush
>refused the offer, while CBC and CNN denied to re****t on that
>fact for the behalf of now dying dismembered American GIs.
>Once the indiscriminate bombing began, targeting almost every
>building in the country of Afghanistan, Laden then claimed he
>had no choice but to fight back to defend US innocent from the
>ungodly enemies of Creation/Freedom. Then the clear to all
>fake video came out with an actor who's face wasn't even close
>to looking remotely like Laden, but for almost the facial
>hair. [Bridge of the Jamaican actor's nose is HALF as long in
>pro****tion to Laden’s for example, and surely frightfully
>shocking for some, the actor doesn't even take blame for 911
>either!] Photos comparing the two faces never aired on CBC and
>CNN available in about twelve seconds with the power of the
>Internet.
>
>9.
>
>former FBI deputy director and murder victim John O'Neill
>
>"the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were
>U.S. oil cor****ate interests and the role played by Saudi
>Arabia."
>
>10.
>
>Alex Jones interviewing Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von
>Buelow
>
>"Bush signed W199I months before 911 ordering the FBI not to
>stop Al-Qaeda. They threatened to arrest FBI agent Robert
>Wright if he tells us what he knows."
>
>11.
>
>Mr. Bush was quoted somewhere regarding Mr. Laden's guilt of
>complete innocence with "We don't need any evidence, we know
>he's guilty."
>
>12.
>
>www.govexec.com/column/forwardTodaysColumn.cfm?sectionID=14
>
>" [FBI's] Edmonds concluded that do***ents clearly showed that
>the Sept. 11 hijackers were in the country and plotting to
>use airplanes as missiles. She said do***ents also included
>information relating to their financial activities. "
>
>13.
>
>The honorable Argentinean oil company Bridas' relation****p can
>not be understated as the Bush Administration's primary motive
>on criminal invasion of Afghanistan to save his biggest
>cor****ate backers, the American pension thieving Enron.
>
>
>From "An American demands the truth from you" by Karl W. B. Schwarz
>
>" I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney
>Energy Task Force meeting and what discussions there were as
>to the steps that would be taken to remove the Taliban and
>Bridas Cor****ation as the last remaining obstacle to the
>United States controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I
>met that company in 1999 and have known since then about the
>Bridas v Unocal, $15 billion interference of contract lawsuit
>in US District Court, Southern District of Texas. I also know
>about the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision on September
>9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas $500 million arbitration
>settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari
>at the United States Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft
>v Bridas."
>
>14.
>
>From "Fresh Memories of War" by Kandea Mosley, The Ithaca Journal (New
>York), 25 May 2002:
>
>"We were told there were no friendly forces," said [Army
>Private Matt] Guckenheimer, an assistant gunner with the 10th
>Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If there was anybody there,
>they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there
>were women and children to kill them."
>
>15.
>
>Quote from "A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial
>Bombing of
>Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting"
>
>by Professor Marc W. Herold Ph.D., M.B.A., B.Sc.
>Departments of Economics and Women's Studies McConnell Hall
>Whittemore School of Business & Economics University of New Hamp****re
>
>When U.S warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gun****ps] the farming
>village of Chowkar- Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar on
>October 22-23rd,killing at least 93 civilians, a Pentagon
>official said, "the people there are dead because we wanted
>them dead." The reason? They sympathized with the Taliban.1
>When asked about the Chowkar incident, Rumsfeld replied, "I
>cannot deal with that particular village."
>
>16.
>
>US TROOPS ADMIT SHOOTING IRAQI CIVILIANS
>http://www.veteransforpeace.org/us_roops_admit_061903.htm
>
>"American troops today admitted they routinely gun down Iraqi
>civilians - some of whom are entirely innocent.
>
>And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line
>coming out from the Pentagon's spin doctors Specialist
>Cor****al Michael Richardson added: "There was no dilemma when
>it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just
>pulled the trigger."
>
>
>The Crown would argue this issue isn’t in her jurisdiction,
>however, it is in mine as a expressive communicator fighting
>for freedom from real tyranny. An irrational tyranny that
>only stands exercised by cor****ate "news bite" censor****p, and
>false imprisonments. An American Prosecutor put Sergeant
>Benderman in prison for refusing to kill God’s children. Now,
>what do you really think America would do, if "they" knew that
>too?
>
>17.
>
>Bush demands total impunity on the war crimes he is personally
>responsible for
>
>http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/icc-o12.shtml
>
>18.
>
>http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FD57CF75-62E8-4C43-BF2D-2D0F0F89437B.htm
>
>"Marines said the men fired on them. A senior officer said
>they had no weapons, but that with shots coming in the men
>were legitimate targets because they ran."
>
>19.
>
>http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=1872
>
>CAIR also wants the Pentagon to investigate a photograph
>circulating the Internet of two Iraqi boys and a U.S.
>soldier. A smiling soldier stands besides the two boys who
>are giving a "thumbs up" sign, as one of boys holds a sign
>written in English that reads, "Lcpl Boudreaux killed my Dad,
>th[en] he knocked up my sister!"
>
>(Link to photo: http://www.cair-net.org/images/lcpl11.jpg)
>
>20.
>
> Guardian Wednesday 7, 2001 - "FBI claims bin Laden inquiry was
>frustrated"
>[this story was on Bush’s top secret W199i directive]
>
>This information would take a well paid intelligence officer,
>or CBC re****ter no more that thirty seconds to look for follow
>ups. For, I know, the BBC did also a national news re****t on
>it.
>
>21.
>
>INTERVIEWER: Are you aware that this tank is contaminated with
>radiation?
>
>SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive.
>
>INTERVIEWER: But we have measured it.
>
>SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive, not this tank.
>
>"Basra is on a river," he noted. "A DU shell poisons the
>water in a river. It poisons the gr***** and the grains. It
>sinks into the ground and poisons the water table. When it
>gets into the body, it does incredible damage. The
>combination of radioactivity and heavy metal toxicity is such
>that it affects the DNA in such a way that you get genetic
>alterations."
>
>[thousands of tons of measured radio-active toxic waste, heavy
>metals, oxidized to microscopic particles as small as a tenth
>of a micron have been deposited in our airspace, however, CBC
>and CNN have refused to inform ourselves on the scientifically
>measurable extremely serious health concern issue..]
>
>22.
>
>Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, "In the exercise of his
>plenary power to use military force," Yoo insisted, "the
>President's decisions are for him alone and are unreviewable."
>Yoo was also quoted recently on CBC national news re****t
>regarding the torturing of innocent people to death, to state
>something like "President Bush doesn’t have to justify his
>opinions to Canada or even to the United States for that
>matter."
>
>23.
>
>The incriminating FBI email dated 22 May 2004, indicates that
>president Bush personally
>signed off on certain interrogation techniques in an executive order."
>(See original at
>http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf)
>
>
>24.
>
>U.S. deserter 'didn't want to have to kill babies'
>
>"Mr. House will argue that American soldiers are guilty of
>war crimes and that forcing Mr. Hinzman to fight in Iraq
>would have made him a war criminal.
>
>He will call as a witness former U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant
>Jimmy Massey, who is expected to testify that he and other
>soldiers shot more than 30 unarmed Iraqis, including women and
>a six-year-old child, at a U.S. military checkpoint."
>
>25.
>
>http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45373-2004Dec7.html
>
>that a clandestine military task force in Iraq was beating
>detainees, ordering Defense Intelligence Agency debriefers out
>of the room during questioning, confiscating evidence of the
>abuse and intimidating the debriefers when they complained."
>
>26.
>
>http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_121004W.shtml
>
>A sacked CIA official is re****tedly suing the agency for
>allegedly retaliating against him for refusing to falsify his
>re****ts on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to sup****t the
>White House's pre-war position.
>
>27.
>
>``I was faced with being deployed to Iraq to do what the
>infantry does, kill people, and I had no justification for
>doing so,'' he testified. ``This was a criminal war. Any act
>of violence in an unjustified conflict is an atrocity.''
>
>28.
>
>Williams's squad stopped a dump truck, and an Iraqi climbed
>out. "Light him up!" the sergeant ordered, according to
>testimony, and the squad opened fire, killing the unarmed man.
>Williams and a squadmate re****tedly got into an argument over
>which of them had scored Company C's first kill.
>
>29.
>
>It gets worse. We already knew about the Franklin County,
>Ohio, precinct that tallied 4,258 votes for Bush when only 638
>people had actually voted.
>
>30.
>
>http://middleeastinfo.org/forum4970
>http://wallofhate.com
>
>Israeli Soldiers Going In For The Kill: A 13 year old
>Palestinian [JEWISH] school girl is about to die
>
>"It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastwards, a
>girl of about 10. She's behind the embankment, scared to
>death."
>
>"Anyone who's mobile, moving in the zone, even if it's a
>three-year-old, needs to be killed."
>
>31.
>
>US forces unleashed more than 20 air strikes and some 60
>artillery rounds on Monday, said Major Todd Desgrosseilliers.
>[...] An AFP re****ter in the Jolan district said one building
>in every 10 had been flattened. As US-led troops closed in on
>the neighborhood overnight, at least four 900-kilogram bombs
>were dropped in the city's northwest.
>
>[destructive radius of a 900-kilogram bomb is half a
>kilometer, and all TRUE accounts of death rates for Fallujah
>alone, a city where the population was forbidden to leave,
>exceed two hundred thousand innocent souls.]
>
>32.
>
>The Bush Administration
>In rush to defend White House, Rice trips over own words
>Friday, March 26 @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
10:12:40 EST
>
>By Walter Pincus and Dana Milbank, San Francisco Chronicle
>
>"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted
>Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.
>11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban.
>The CIA contradicted Rice's earlier assertion that Bush had
>requested a CIA briefing in the summer of 2001 because of
>elevated terrorist threats. And Rice's assertion this week
>that Bush had told her on Sept. 16, 2001, that "Iraq is to
>the side" appeared to be contradicted by an order signed by
>Bush on Sept. 17 directing the Pentagon to begin planning
>military options for an invasion of Iraq."
>
>[ And...]
>
>http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html
>
>"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted
>Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.
>11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban."
>
>This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through
>prior experiences of Muslim fundamentalists, such as the
>Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to
>persecute the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only
>needing to do, and had officially done, was to use no evidence
>to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a
>result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not
>follow the crime scene leads at the real murder scene to nab
>to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret
>plot.
>
>33.
>
>Blix nor Elbaradei, nor Kofi, suggested, implied, or stated,
>that Iraq had failed to comply with the newest U.N.
>resolution: 1441.
>
>HANS BLIX: "And at this juncture, we are able to perform
>professional no-notice inspections all over Iraq and to
>increase aerial surveillance..."
>
>With complete, one hundred percent access to go where ever the
>Bush Administration pleased without delay, left a situation of
>an unjust war only detrimental to an ability to bring about
>any good or better thing. American soldiers are being
>sacrificed for no better good or reason understood, for if
>progress will ever be made, it will be when they work to bring
>about a political situation that was there in Iraq before the
>Bush Administration starting murdering innocent people for
>nothing . Well, not completely, for Bremer ****pped 19 billion
>to Greenspan early on, then, hundreds of millions were sent
>back.
>
>
>34.
>
>Professor Steven E. Jones, a tenured BYU professor, went
>public several weeks ago after releasing a 19 page academic
>paper, essentially showing how the laws of physics do not
>sup****t the WTC's freefall and, consequently, the official
>government story. It should be known that World Trade Center
>Building Seven was not struck by an airplane, yet fell exactly
>the same as the two towers.
>
>Below both towers were found pools of molten steel, only
>creatable with the heating by high explosives.
>
>Excerpts from "Me, Art Bell, and 9-11 by Lisa Guliani"
>
>The official version of the WTC collapses defy both Galileo's
>Law of Falling Bodies, and also Isaac Newton's First Law of
>Motion.
>
>..if we know that hydrocarbon fires can only reach a maximum
>temperature of 1517 degrees Fahrenheit, how could they
>possibly have melted this steel, when the melting point of
>steel is 2,795 degrees and the boiling point of steel (when it
>becomes a molten liquid) is 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit.
>
>The existence of these burning pools of molten steel were confirmed
>by:
>
> - Mark Lorieux of Controlled Demolition, Inc
> - Peter Tully, President of Tully Construction
> - and the American Free Press newspaper
>
>
>35.
>
>"To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got
>the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on
>Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11..."
>
>Tony Blair Speaking To House of Commons Liaison Committee
>
>36.
>
>The Wa****ngton Post, 23 September 2001.
>
>At American urging, Ahmed traveled ... to Kandahar,
>Afghanistan. There he delivered the bluntest of demands.
>Turn over bin Laden without conditions, he told Taliban leader
>Mohammad Omar, or face certain war with the United States and
>its allies.
>
>Mahmoud's meetings on two separate missions with the Taliban
>were re****ted as a "failure." Yet this "failure" to extradite
>Osama without providing a shred of eidence was part of
>Wa****ngton's do***ented design, providing a pretext for a
>military intervention which was already in the pipeline. If
>Osama had been extradited, the main justification for waging a
>war "against international terrorism" would no longer hold.
>Nor would the ready to go Patriot Act. Incidentally, when
>MSNBC contacted the Whitehouse regarding the top secret
>invasion of Afghanistan plan, it was confessed that the plan
>had been "fully implemented"
>
>
>38.
>
>"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it
>is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it
>is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it
>is a democracy, or a fascist dictator****p, or a parliament, or
>a communist dictator****p ... Voice or no voice, the people
>can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is
>easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being
>attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism
>and exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering, Nazi
>leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II
>
>39.
>
>On the wall of the National Holocaust Museum: " Thou shall
>not be a victim, thou shall not be a perpetrator, and thou
>shall not be a by-stander"
>
>
>
>----------------
>
>
>When we cancel other people's human rights, we cancel our own.
>
> =Helen & Harry Highwater=
>
>---
>
>HELP ME FOR CHRIST SAKE!
>
>Please, I beg you to assist me in this cause immediately!
>
>Ack! It turns out that there IS a criminal conspiracy run out of the
>Winnipeg Police Department's Exploitation Unit!
>
>Ack!! It turns out that the Crown IS aiding and abetting the
>terrorist crimes of first degree mass murder!!
>
>Ack!!! It turns out the Judge threw this whole Revelation thing out
>without any consideration offered, while the Crown is currently
>working on a public ban of disclosure in Winnipeg on these
>continuing do***ented crimes!!!
>
>50,000!! a pop! Stolen from law abiding business owners!!!
>
>Crimes forwarded to the public in part by the concern of Manitoba's
>Premier!!!!!
>
>SEND THIS TO EVERY RCMP OFFICER OR SOLDIER OF FORTUNE YOU CAN FIND!
>
>Send this post for me to also Winnipeg media persons or to anyone who
>will listen. If you don't, then, you ain't my friend. Come on! Do
>something for us, and I promise to help you out later if I can.
>Help me through the goodness of your heart, so we won't get
>railroaded into prison fraudulently by those that hide in darkness
>as pirates of our human will. The will to be free.
>
>
>The Crown's interpretations of my possessions are not my expressions!!
>
>I AM INNOCENT.
>
>The Judge through this whole thing out for the defense
>without any consideration offered to OUR COURT!
>
>HELP!!!
>
>---
>
>Since I am representing myself on these particular criminal
>matters, Legal Aid is not required to lend assistance on the
>grounds that I'm not co-operating with the system as it
>operates through professional Barred representations. [I am
>eligible for walk in consultations but nothing of the sort of
>assistance I am requesting] Considering the complexity of my
>judicial matter, I would request legal assistance from the
>Court in these following areas.
>
>1. National Security Issues
>
>I need assistance in understanding the legal statutes that our
>national security services are obligated to practice under, to
>insure our national security matters are being truly defended
>in my respect. No change in summation of my character was
>altered, after they were granted a search warrant to verify it
>was me who publicly spoke out for honorable FBI officers
>denied their rights to speak freely, then as the Court knows,
>instead of doing what they argued to grant such privilege to
>infringe on my personal liberty, enforced a less than perfect
>law that most others would buckle under, even if they harbored
>no criminal intent, and would never do anything to infringe on
>the rights of any child. For I challenge; it does not serve
>Canada's interest (in particular our teen soldiers) to
>knowingly have Canada propagandized under the serious failures
>of CBC and the National Security Services to lend no wanting
>cry to hear REAL FBI officers who factually allege, with
>evidence and everything, President Bush's business partner,
>(who was at the Whitehouse Sept. 9th working on the top
>secret invasion of Afghanistan strategy to heavily arm heroin
>pushers who war to keep women as slaves while weaponizing
>children - done all for a liquefied gas pipe line to profit
>his darling dear Enron) funded 9/11's "mastermind"
>"ringleader" Mohammad Atta. Inside sources from the RCMP have
>notified me, that in the last four years, Section D's salaried
>employees, have done practically nothing to serve Canada's
>interest in this respect. While Canada's CSIS does not have
>the legal ability to speak out publicly regarding the criminal
>transgressions of President Bush, and because of this nature
>of CSIS's position, they have almost only fears to live with
>by trying. A CSIS officer told me, many were completely aware
>of President Bush's criminality regarding his hugely
>treasonous actions of mass murder on 9/11, but could do
>practically nothing about it outside of filing the re****ts
>with the federal government, or maybe anonymously sending
>something to CBC, with no promises that anyone would actually
>read it. All the while, the senior CSIS boss brags
>contemptuously in public about his ties and commitment to his
>friends in the ISI. Perceived easily/mistakenly I'd imagine
>as a threat to all of Canada's Honorable police officers and
>Judges. [General Ahmad was the Bush junta's appointed head of
>the ISI.] I think Canada's Prime Minister Paul Martin is
>genuinely a good man, but it is hard to see him publicly take
>a stand on this issue, [if he even received said re****ts] on
>behalf of honorable police officers and soldiers everywhere,
>in defense of the human race, risking everything, considering
>he already does bring about a great deal of good for Canadians
>where he stands. [Compared to you know, a let's send the kids
>to war for whatever Harper, or nobody in Winnipeg
>("officially" 86%) wants us to give away the public assets so
>let's do it anyway for ourselves privately Filmon] But to know
>the RCMP's Section D, sides that they can't tell us the top
>secret reason they have not perused Justice for the sake of
>Canadian soldiers who bravely put their lives on the line, of
>which some have already died, is a situation no Canadian would
>tolerate if they knew these freely available facts to decide
>for themselves. Sure we can be counted lucky that only so few
>Canadians have died thus far, but when will the sacrifice of
>Americans, Afghanis, Iraqis, and soon to be Iranians with the
>Syrians, along with more than fifty other countries officially
>marked for death by the lawlessly irrational bu****e
>terrorists, be more than YOUR willing to bare? As publicly
>re****ted repeatedly in European press, Mr. Sattler ordered
>the bombing of health care clinics in Fallujah as first strike
>targets because he didn't want doctors or nurses to "falsely"
>re****t that his forces target primarily the innocent to steal
>more from America in blood and treasure. Then under Sattler's
>command, they proceeded to monstrously murder more than two
>hundred thousand innocent souls, while covering the region in
>radio-active toxic waste that will continue to kill for a
>scientifically estimated billion or two years. Hell on Earth
>is what un- arrested Sattler represents as an enemy to all
>living things. God included. An aside: Did you know the
>commander of the Third Infantry, Maj. Gen. Buford 'buff'
>Blount III, is truly a Saudi Wahhabist in disguise, who took
>up the job at the request of the Bush junta, and subsequently
>left near 170 tons of plastic explosives unprotected for
>looting in Qaqaa? Why? Well when asked why he commanded to
>leave the weapons unattended to instead, go carnage Baghdad,
>with, I'm serious, sanctioned thieving expeditions, he
>replied, he just wanted to let us know he was there. "We just
>wanted to let them know that we're here.'' In Basra, the
>coalition is still leaving as of last week, more than 30 known
>weapons storage facilities unprotected. See, the neo-con
>peenacker gang can't steal everything without a stupid man war
>going. Left continuing unattended without national
>discussions, leaves further in it's wake, more innocent
>victims of war crimes fallen undefended. I would ask that
>instead of me seeking to find where it is written, that the
>RCMP must be committed to getting the man for nine eleven,
>perhaps I can just request we work together, for a national
>CBC radio forum kicked off by some kinda joint, international
>press release acknowledging briefly our failures to
>communicate in the past, and politely request where Canada
>could go through open line discussions on these very serious
>matters. We must not allow our soldiers to be made
>misinformed by CBC's unwillingness to bravely with honor,
>defend our great Nation. Or, perhaps, Canada might want to
>consider hiring me on as, we'll see how it goes honorary RCMP
>spokesperson?, a paid consultant for my expertise in
>recognizing the real bad guys, and then I'll go out there, and
>win the good fight by using praise with fewer insults. If we
>stay committed to defending freedom by defeating war
>criminals, we all will be the better for it. Now, take me to
>your leader.
>
>2. Local Police Issues
>
>As so was brought to the attention of the Courts in the
>previous motions, through considering the charge that was
>brought against me, (where no criminal intent in alleged, and
>nobody can possibly see a digital image until it is already at
>least in one's possession, case closed, I'm free to go still
>without my stolen computer gear.) I discover, the child
>exploitation unit is not operating in a manner that would
>effectually reduce the proliferation of truly illegal
>materials. They have included images to demonize me that they
>must know are left legal to distribute, or for those couple
>images categorized as for sure illegal unto themselves, are
>left publicly unhindered when it comes to Police questioning
>in a manner that would concern illegal public expressions.
>Now, I personally don't believe the Courts are consciously
>operating in a nefarious manner deliberately to steal computer
>gears to sell as sadomasochists who enjoy seeing lovers of
>life go to prison falsely for five year stints, but come on,
>something seriously needs to be done in how things there are
>run. I believe the failures are, in part, do to the personal
>fears officers have of the information universe; for to
>acknowledge information sharing through p2p networks or
>Usenet, would be to witness criminal code violations by the
>score going cor****ately unaddressed. Like Bush being guilty
>for high treason in God's America for example, Iraqi church
>goers slaughtered by faithful Bush lovers, women raped by
>"freedom fighting" GIs, the *** slave trade, or that VLT's are
>being run criminally (section 209, 380(1) 380(2), 181, 52(1-4)
>with a math game scam that even a sixth grader can figure, but
>not the "Free Press" editor, or commercial savvy CJOB's Vic
>G-----. Being our city's big Bush backers, where our dying
>universe is simpler, like "we don't need any evidence, we know
>he's guilty", refuses a, trying to be responsible citizen to
>formulate their own conclusions through our media on why we
>have laws. Anyway, I need to have some one to cross check the
>"illegal" images through recorded internet domains, to see
>which ones are/were located in Canada and elsewhere, and what
>if any attempt the exploitation unit tried to limit found
>providers. I suspect many providers they would claim they
>can't do anything about, are so not because a crime is
>occurring, but in that respect, actual evidence of criminal
>conduct would be required before an internet provider, server,
>or site owner could be recommended for censor****p. Not this,
>twenty year olds look like they could be ten year olds, or
>that, simply ****d children being human should not be viewed
>in their/our minds as something youthfully beautiful.
>
>To Police effectually, I would suggest a public domain
>transparently coded checksum program checker to automatically
>recognize, known illegal materials made available free, with a
>downloadable database updated by the work of one or two
>officers monitoring currently available internet image traffic
>- classifiable almost near the speed of electricity across the
>country. This action is good to take despite my personal
>innocence or fraudulent guilt, for media labelings are
>completely impossible to designate content/control, but as
>such, shouldn't forbid Police services from locating where
>possibly actual hugely offensive content is being distributed
>through. With volunteer co- operation of programming, a user,
>server, or internet service provider could be warned of
>material almost in their possession as expression is
>classified criminal so then simply delete it, and carry on.
>I'm confident such Police planning with open for public
>appeals to fine tune further, would end putting the hugely
>profitable exploitation units across the continent almost
>completely out of business. Now, who truly wants that?
>
>3. Constitutional Challenges
>
>This possession charge absent intent, where everybody is auto
>guilty to lose all their stolen computer gear through
>fraudulent demonization of the innocent included, is a for
>sure, crime in progress. I'd imagine if we had a public
>inquiry, we'd find what the exploitation crews are doing, is
>needing to locate only a small few arguably illegal
>depictions, then trumping up a lot of fraudulent totals.
>Figuring, I'd imagine, if they openly started convicting
>individuals for a couple of images they perhaps deleted when
>witnessed, people might begin to ask, just how much money is
>the unit taking in sold stolen merchandise? Perhaps 50,000
>dollars in a single case where the business owner of said
>stolen property wasn't even charged for a criminal offense!
>No troublesome Court appearance required to protect your
>public business image even! Generally, in cases that do reach
>trial, all images are seldomly reviewed by the Courts, and at
>the "professional" ****o viewers discretion, or the Crown, a
>small sample is only offered. [The professional ****d people
>person they have in my case I suspect is lost somewhere in
>bushville as the clinically insane, or just extremely helpful
>to my Judicial cause, thanks big guy, either way.] This has
>worked largely unhindered because lawyers for the defense
>wouldn't generally see a connection. For only one freely
>available image that you couldn't see until you already had
>it, is all that is needed to put a, loss for words Canadian,
>in prison for half a decade. Not only that, but such
>convictions insist irrationally that the guilty must also be
>***ually deviant and require professional counseling. The law
>enforced absent rights infringed needs to be Constitutionally
>challenged as clearly unjust, and the sentencing structure as
>being seriously cruel. [What does one guilty of an actual
>assault for comparison get, or better yet, threat of assault
>that was never truly made?] So, as a result, I need the
>assistance of Constitutional lawyers who would provide me
>consultations on prepatory requirements and on the relevant
>Constitutional questions regarding this specific challenge.
>And maybe co-operation with the Crown or Police chief to tally
>records and total sales figures on cases under similar
>cir***stances to consider the exploitation unit for
>re-evaluation. [Example: The foolish, faith in ignorance
>argument given by all similar units, is that nothing can be
>securely deleted from a hard drive is assuredly patently
>ridiculous. Truly indicative however, that we do indeed have
>a real hidden problem here regarding their/our intelligence
>gathering capabilities.] While maybe sup****ting public
>discussions on how to even improve further, the valuable work
>that the exploitation unit surely does do already somewhere
>I'm sure to operate for our interests. We may together have
>to overthrow CJOB with our human skills at demanding some
>space to talk about bettering our lives by communicating
>without two minute commercials every five minutes, and opening
>up the phone lines to talk about whatever. They take too much
>from us as the clearly disenfranchised already. Like, so
>who's talk radio station is it anyway?
>
>4. The Crown's Crown
>
>I have concerns regarding the job requirements that our
>community asks a Crown to bravely achieve. One, would be to
>pursue Justice for the principled betterment of our society.
>It is clear to anyone familiar with my case, that our
>cor****ate media managers have decided for one fear or another,
>that such noble reaches must be left from the grasp of
>Canadian soldiers and their loving giving families. This
>place the Court holds of a principle that all people should be
>treated fairly, includes those we know Bush has already had
>murdered in America under these left silenced demands for a
>true accounting by good police work completed already. The
>fear that every criminal Court Crown shrugs off when proudly
>defending the innocent in our legal challenges, seems thus
>far, absent in sup****t of Justice for Johnny. When I read
>statements from the Crown stating, John's legal arguments
>against traitor Bush is irrelevant to the case our Crown
>hold's against myself, in our name as Canadians, smacks of an
>unjust and blind totalitarian state. Cor****ately broadcasted
>uncertainty is forsaking the innocent lives of Bush's
>continuing real murder victims. Certainly, the Crown has a
>responsibility to pursue just causes, and granted, can falsely
>suspect I don't hold the best of intentions towards life with
>everything I am. However, the Crown's summations of my
>character will never change the official FBI's conclusions
>arrived at by following the crime scene leads, at the real
>murder scene, to discover who personally is still escaping
>arrest for mass murder of our good friends in New York City on
>9/11. A crime who's principle perpetrators obviously
>faithfully count on this form of injustice to dictate
>continuous failures by our Crown to serve our public interest.
>For whatever reason, my case do***ents a cor****ate news agenda
>of non-committal in our pursuit of Justice for ourselves as
>the little people. Ourselves, including the Crown's of all
>Canada, are, without doubt, denied fair representation by CBC
>standards. Canada is being left not defending honorable
>American police officers, doing their jobs to the best of
>their ability, should not leave too, our Public's Crown
>unrepresented. (If the Crowns of Canada so willed it in our
>names.) So, I would ask that the Crown's refusal to speak out
>for Canada, while fighting to silence my cries with an unjust
>as cruel prison sentence, be investigated for obstructing
>Justice, and therefore, aiding and abetting the terrorist
>crimes of first degree mass murder. Now, how to do this...
>I'm not sure. Perhaps the Court's assistance of aid in the
>form of one or two Crown offices from a different province in
>Canada could be considered, or a Constitutional Law firm more
>up on what all I got to work with here. Look, somebody has
>tricked my nation, and subsequently our naiver youths, into
>excepting Canadians can not hear the silenced screams of
>global tyranny. If soldiers the world over need to die for
>Bush, let it be for something worth fighting. Freedom must be
>Canada, a Canada that would go if asked, in favor of Universal
>Justice always. Just ask US.
>
>
>Your Friend,
>
>John W.
>
>-----------------
>
>I know I'm innocent under the law as it currently stands, and
>in addition, I wished to teach our Courts why the law stands
>unjust against our public in other respects. With no criminal
>intent to obtain or distribute something illegal alleged
>against myself, and the simple truth that one can not perceive
>an image until it is at the very least, already in one's
>possession, says enough by itself. But most im****tantly, the
>Crown's interpretations of my possessions are not my
>expressions. Example: I could have in my possession a
>written work from one who espouses the glories of war criming,
>but I, personally, am diametrically opposed to it's unwise
>declarations. I still use it however to gain understanding of
>my world in which I politically work to improve God's World
>through indivisibly principled reason.
>
>
>
>Feel free to do with this as you will.
>
>
>---------------
>
>
>
>
>THE QUEEN'S BENCH
>
>
>WINNIPEG CENTRE
>
>
>
>
>NOTICE OF MOTION
>
>For an Order of Production
>
>
>
>BETWEEN:
>
>
>
>
>HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
>
>
>
>and
>
>
>
>JOHNNY WIZARD
>
>
>
>
>
>Accused.
>
>
>
>
>
>This Notice of Motion regarding an Order of Production is to
>have disclosed to the defense, the complete evidence without
>undue hindrance, evidence the Crown holds against the accused
>as a member of our public. These following arguments are the
>reasons why Justice must prevail in these proceedings:
>
>
>Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 7. "No person
>shall be deprived of life, liberty or security of the person
>except in accordance with the principles of fundamental
>justice."
>
>R. v. Stinchcombe "[...] counsel for the Crown is under a
>general duty to disclose all relevant information."
>
>In R. v. Stinchcombe, the Supreme Court of Canada held once
>again, as any legitimate Court of any land would, that the
>accused in criminal cases has a Constitutional right to full
>and complete disclosure of the Crown's case. Yet, in the
>criminal case involving myself, the Crown's refusal to return
>my legal property [such as including my actual expressions] is
>motivated by contempt for fundamental justice - for true
>accountability - by intentionally working to deceive our
>Courts through denying the evidence of one: the charge
>against me is truly fraudulent under our law as it stands
>currently, and two: that I don't already have the silent
>moral sup****t of every honorable top secret intelligence
>officer this world over.
>
>
>Canada's "Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian
>Officials in Relation to Maher Arar"
>
>"The RCMP notes that because national security investigations
>are criminal investigations, the possibility of judicial
>scrutiny always exists and the presence of this possibility
>acts as an indirect accountability mechanism." [Maher Arar was
>an innocent Canadian tortured and left for murdered by the
>irrational as criminal pro-bush forces negatively influencing
>Canadian jurisprudence.]
>
>
><BIG SNPD>
>
>Yours truly,
>
>JOHNNY WIZARD
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>
>
>THE QUEEN'S BENCH
>
>WINNIPEG CENTRE
>
>
>
>NOTICE OF MOTION
>
>for the Crown to Stay Proceedings
>
>
><BIG SNPD>
>
>you know what is right, though you may still be blind, never too
>late to
>change your mind, we are all in agreement, in truth we rise, evil is
>just the
>deceived disguised...
>
>
>STAND TOGETHER, OR DON'T
>
>Our Gambling Problem
>
>
>
><BIG-SNP>
>
> All
>we need now are private prisons and the economy will really
>take off
>screaming! The one only reason people commit crimes is cause, they
>know we
>don't have guns. Bombs don't kill people that are killing people!
>The sky
>isn't falling, the sky isn't falling. Something to consider,
>what's the
>cause-like symptom and how do you treat it? Like an infection? As
>a matter
>of truth, it is completely without question, there it is no such
>thing, as
>deception. Now you know the rules, your losses, odds and stakes.
>What's your
>limit? Can you stop? Are you feeling okay buddy? Let us get out
>of here,
>and go to talk.
>
>
>------
>
>
>
>Sleep Walkers
>
>http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/sleep_walker_-
>__our_enemy_traitor_mr._bush_jr.mp3
>http://arizona.indymedia.org/uploads/sleep_walker_-
>__our_enemy_traitor_mr._bush_jr.mp3
>
>
>HERO
>
>http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3
>http://arizona.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3
>
>/ / That is a high act of treason. And it's not,
>"oh well, but maybe it's not true.." No, we have
>the two do***ents of question. \ \
>
>
>
>
>What is the Coast to Coast radio network Head talking
>about tonight?, the re-re-re-ha****ng of the "Allaways
>Interslinging" Bigfoot phenomenon? Where was I...
>
>Look, you're not going to go to hell for not giving me a
>couple of dollars to further my cause, but it sure
>couldn't help to leave me without any sup****t here
>whatsoever.
>
>
>
>--
>
>White House keeps dossiers on more than 10,000 'political enemies'
>
>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7625.shtml
>
>---
>
>The United States of America v. Adam Vaughn
>http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.10/kid****.html
>
>He was a stand-up Marine, a beloved cop, and a local hero
>
>--
>
>http://ww.alternet.org/columnists/story/15407/
>
>/ / It's as if our government is telling us that if we're
>going to look at ****, we'd better pay for it. Otherwise,
>we might get branded pedophiles. How many innocent lives
>will be destroyed before the child **** wars are over? \ \
>
>
>---
>
>
>WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON?
>
>/ / Specialist Damien “Monster” Corsetti--known
>affectionately as the “King of Torture” among his Bagram
>colleagues--was later fined and demoted for forcing an
>Iraqi woman to strip during an interrogation at Abu
>Ghraib. Yet Corsetti remains a free man. \ \
>
>
>Will America hunt to kill the un-arrested bu****e cancer
>that knows thyself as the "King of Torture"? Who's
>blasphemous open contempt for all that is God doesn't even
>earn him a spot on America's Most Wanted?
>
>/ / "Suggestions that U.S. forces targeted civilians with
>these weapons are simply wrong," U.S. Marine Major Tim
>Keefe said in an e-mail to Reuters. "Had the producers of
>the do***entary bothered to ask us for comment, we would
>have certainly told them that the premise of the program
>was erroneous." \ \
>
>
>Does not such treasonous conduct warrant a military
>misdemeanor of bush ***** Tim Keefe? He even claims to
>have knowledge of the undisputable endless footage
>that do***ents nazi attacks against the completely
>innocent as defenseless. But the premise of a commitment
>for Americans to truly war Our enemies being the truly
>Just and Free, at least under his falsehoods of
>leader****p, is an erroneous argument. For, bu****es are
>the bad guys, who lie cheat and steal don't you know.
>
>
>---
>
>/ / Bush didn't have any popularity left. Overnight tracking
>polls showed Kilgore dropped three percentage points after the
>President's appearance and Democrat Tim Kaine won on Tuesday.
>
>Conservative Pennsylvania Republican Senator Rick Santorum
>told radio talk show host Don Imus Wednesday that he does not
>want the President's help and will stay away from a Bush rally
>in his state on Friday. \ \
>
>-------------
>
>
>http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/bush_not_concerned_about_laden_walking_away
>.wmv
>
>
>http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/somebody16.mp3
>
>/ / We're getting international police co-operation on this matter. \
>\
>
>--
>
>http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/another-lob.mp3
>
>Bush Jnr. is sure wicked evil song
>
>http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/bush_jnr._is_sure_wicked_evil_song.mp3
|
