Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Goth Convergence > Re: Cabal decis...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 17 of 23 Topic 202 of 297
Post > Topic >>

Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]

by "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 25, 2007 at 11:40 AM

On 25 Apr 2007 09:04:04 -0700, gtrosper@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On Apr 22, 3:30 pm, "Peter H. Coffin" <hell...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> *unofficial*
>>
>> Look dude, the rules have been established and essentially abided by
>> for about seven years, with no one ever thinking that these were even
>> unclear. At the bottom of nearly all of the posts has been an email
>> address of where questions could be sent. Absent questions, the rules
>> and precedent are obviously clear. Now, two commitees decide that those
>> rules and precedents obviously don't apply to them and it never even
>> occurs to them to ask? No, the simple answer is that they didn't *want*
>> to be noticed by the steering commitee. They didn't *want* to ask and
>> be told "No, you can't." They specifically chose spaces they *knew* the
>> steering commitee didn't frequent. They didn't "pre-announce" or
"gather
>> opinion" on the afterglow mailing list, they didn't do it here, they
>> didn't do it on the two big LJ communities, they didn't do it on Tribe.
>> They *hid*, because they EXPECTED that it would be considered against
>> the rules, but thought that they'd have something to gain by doing it.
>>
> That's an assumption. Did you ask either committee if *hiding* was
> their intention?

Sure it's an assumption. Whether they intended *hiding* or not isn't
germane to the issue of bid disqualification. It sure looks damned
strange, though, because of below.

> I could just as easily assume that Dallas and Hollywood were over-
> enthusiastic about forulating their bids and used MySpace as a tool to
> get people involved in helping to formulate said bids.
>
> If a committee is going to take the time to bother creating a bid by
> speaking with hotels and entertainment venues, it only makes sense
> they would want to *win* the bid, thus Hollywood's "register to vote"
> blog on MySpace. Nefarious ulterior motives? Highly doubtful.

It only makes sense that they'd also push this information out on
official channels, where people that attend regularly look for it.
That's your real core of word-of-mouth spread, and the people you don't
have to coax into going. But... nothing. No word at all. Nothing on
LiveJournal. Nothing on the Afterglow mailing list. Certainly nothing
here.

-- 
"The last refuge of the insomniac is a sense of superiority to the
 sleeping world."
                --Leonard Cohen, The Favourite Game
 




 23 Posts in Topic:
C14 bids: committees jumping the gun
eilis <eilis@[EMAIL PR  2007-04-20 20:06:03 
Re: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun
clackmannan <clackmann  2007-04-21 07:48:02 
Re: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun
we won't stay dead <an  2007-04-21 10:57:02 
Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
Siobhan <news@[EMAIL P  2007-04-21 20:03:12 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
tepesh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-04-21 20:06:30 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
"Peter H. Coffin&quo  2007-04-21 22:33:12 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
Micahra <micahra@[EMAI  2007-04-21 22:18:49 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
"Peter H. Coffin&quo  2007-04-22 11:09:02 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
tepesh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-04-22 03:53:06 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
Siobhan <news@[EMAIL P  2007-04-22 10:56:15 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
tepesh <tepesh@[EMAIL   2007-04-22 14:09:36 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
Siobhan <news@[EMAIL P  2007-04-22 18:25:24 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
"Peter H. Coffin&quo  2007-04-22 17:30:56 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
Rafe <rafe@[EMAIL PROT  2007-04-26 07:02:17 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
Macross Actual <grpery  2007-04-23 08:20:20 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
gtrosper@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-04-25 09:04:04 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
"Peter H. Coffin&quo  2007-04-25 11:40:31 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
we won't stay dead <an  2007-04-26 07:45:53 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
"Peter H. Coffin&quo  2007-04-26 10:49:38 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
we won't stay dead <an  2007-04-27 10:53:43 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
"Peter H. Coffin&quo  2007-04-27 15:01:59 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
Axel <axel@[EMAIL PROT  2007-04-28 14:03:47 
Re: Cabal decision [was: C14 bids: committees jumping the gun]
we won't stay dead <an  2007-04-27 21:42:03 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 11:00:39 CST 2008.