On Apr 29, 10:44 am, "Peter H. Coffin" <hell...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Mostly by talking to local people one-on-one (email or face to face) to
> get them to participate, and asking Siobhan for the list of prior event
> commitee folk for the experienced guides. Exploration expecially can
> usually be covered with one local visionary, two local lackeys, and one
> advisor.
Excellent.
> EVERYTHING is available to be discussed (though not everything will or
> should be changed), and here's pretty much THE place to put the
> discussion about it for public view.
I put this here so it could remain for people in the future looking
for the same info. So, since your post is going to expire, I am
quoting the whole thing! I hope that's okay...
I worry that this year's controversy will make some people afraid to
talk about potential bids publically, and I know that it isn't really
a problem if it's done right... but I'm at a loss for how to do it
right, specifically. Of greater concern, I also think some of the
assholes are going to be looking very carefully for "violations" to
attempt to discredit other bids in the future, so it might be a good
idea to codify the process a little more, beyond the "email Siobhan
about it," suggestion.
I hope Siobhan, Axel, et al, will chime in here so we have some
starting guidelines.
- Madelyn
|
