Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Goth Convergence > Re: About Formi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 13 Topic 205 of 297
Post > Topic >>

Re: About Forming a Convergence Exploratory Commitee

by Siobhan <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 29, 2007 at 05:54 PM

On 29 Apr 2007 10:50:46 -0700, lulugarou@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

>On Apr 29, 10:44 am, "Peter H. Coffin" <hell...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Mostly by talking to local people one-on-one (email or face to face) to
>> get them to participate, and asking Siobhan for the list of prior event
>> commitee folk for the experienced guides. Exploration expecially can
>> usually be covered with one local visionary, two local lackeys, and one
>> advisor.
>
>Excellent.
>
>> EVERYTHING is available to be discussed (though not everything will or
>> should be changed), and here's pretty much THE place to put the
>> discussion about it for public view.
>
>I put this here so it could remain for people in the future looking
>for the same info. So, since your post is going to expire, I am
>quoting the whole thing! I hope that's okay...

I agree with Peter. This is the place to figure this stuff out.

I don't really have an answer for what changes are going to be made -
or even when we are going to have it all decided because the
discussion is very much  still on-going. I'm very much in favour of
having as much of that discussion as possible here and in a.g. where
all interested parties can participate.

>I worry that this year's controversy will make some people afraid to
>talk about potential bids publically, and I know that it isn't really
>a problem if it's done right... but I'm at a loss for how to do it
>right, specifically. Of greater concern, I also think some of the
>assholes are going to be looking very carefully for "violations" to
>attempt to discredit other bids in the future, so it might be a good
>idea to codify the process a little more, beyond the "email Siobhan
>about it," suggestion.

Most of the "interested parties" have been speaking from the
perspective on attendees, but if we get some input from potential
organizers as well, that's even better. (I'm assuming that's the
reason for the question, do correct me if I'm wrong.)

I'm very much in favour of having of having potential organizers
throwing in their two bits as well. Identifying their interest isn't
self-promotion.

Siobhan
 




 13 Posts in Topic:
About Forming a Convergence Exploratory Commitee
lulugarou@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-04-28 10:53:52 
Re: About Forming a Convergence Exploratory Commitee
"Peter H. Coffin&quo  2007-04-29 11:44:08 
Re: About Forming a Convergence Exploratory Commitee
lulugarou@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-04-29 10:50:46 
Re: About Forming a Convergence Exploratory Commitee
"Peter H. Coffin&quo  2007-04-29 13:38:07 
Re: About Forming a Convergence Exploratory Commitee
Siobhan <news@[EMAIL P  2007-04-29 17:54:30 
Re: About Forming a Convergence Exploratory Commitee
Siobhan <news@[EMAIL P  2007-04-29 18:16:34 
Re: About Forming a Convergence Exploratory Commitee
Axel <axel@[EMAIL PROT  2007-05-03 22:59:34 
Re: About Forming a Convergence Exploratory Commitee
"Satori" <dw  2007-05-04 19:09:44 
Re: About Forming a Convergence Exploratory Commitee
lulugarou@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-04-29 17:28:32 
Re: About Forming a Convergence Exploratory Commitee
we won't stay dead <an  2007-04-30 05:51:40 
Re: About Forming a Convergence Exploratory Commitee
we won't stay dead <an  2007-04-30 06:07:43 
Re: About Forming a Convergence Exploratory Commitee
Trid <triddlywinks@[EM  2007-05-05 21:00:17 
Re: About Forming a Convergence Exploratory Commitee
Axel <axel@[EMAIL PROT  2007-05-06 13:44:39 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 14:02:21 CDT 2008.