Re: Ok

Winter Arcane wrote:

> <agsf_57@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:1103701444.506961.203750@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>Tiny Human Ferret wrote:
>>
>>>This is bogus, and probably goes against all of evolution. But you
>>>knew that!
>>
>>Actually, I would think that if the man is unable to function because
>>his needs are not met, then the whole family suffers? The thread died
>>down anyway.
> 
> 
> Any parent that would put their needs ahead of those of the children is 
> probably a liability rather than a benefit to the family.  I love my
wife 
> intensely, but as far as I'm concerned if it comes down to her or the 
> children...she's expendable.
> 

while that's the prevailing view in the west, in many other cultures it 
would be the children who were expendable.  if the wife was saved, you 
could have more children, if the children were saved, you would be less 
able to care for them, and unlikely to have any other children.

siani
-- 
\\||//
- oo -
-|--|-  (hedgehog)