Re: Weekly posting summary

"H Duffy" <hester_duffy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:666uvuF2iqpjuU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "whisky-dave" <whisky-dave@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:ftleir$sic$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "H Duffy" <hester_duffy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:664aljF1p34o9U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> *sigh* The reason I said that picture never existed, you ****ing
moron, 
>>> is because you were describing an alleged picture of _me_, which I
know 
>>> never existed.
>> Yes it has, as I've seen it and so have others.
>
> But if it is as you've described it, it isn't a picture of _me_.
Well I think it was you and no one else has said it wasn't.


>
>>
>>>It's not because the site is down, it's because I never did the things 
>>>you described. Do you understand the difference?
>> What things were they then ?
>>
>> It was either you sitting on David D,. lap or he on yours, there's no 
>> crime in it
>> so why not just admit it. The only reason I saw it was because a friend
>> pointed it out as he was looking for pictures of his friends and he did
a 
>> search
>> and while In wasn;t in the picture the text below the picture
>> was Hester with a whisky dave mask on and he asked me who this Hester
was
>> otherwise I';d probably never have seen it, perhaps you didn't see it
but 
>> that is not
>> evidence that it never existed.
>
> I've never worn a Whisky dave mask. Therefore, if the person in the
photo 
> was wearing a Whisky Dave mask, it wasn't me. Clear?

You are incredibly stupid aren't you.
I NEVER said anyone was wearing such a mask, but that was the title
or the description that the picture came under I never said any one was
wearing any mask did  you not understand that.

I don't even know if it was taken at Whitby but it was on a site that had
other pictures of people at Whitby, it seemed to be part of a collection
of pictures taken at Whitby.


>
> H
>