Re: Weekly posting summary

"whisky-dave" <whisky-dave@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fui185$838$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "H Duffy" <hester_duffy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:66s79iF2lif48U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> But you didn't make it clear that the description didn't match the 
>>>> picture.
>>> How did yuo work that one out ?
>>
>> You said so, you dope; according to you, the description said it was me

>> wearing a Whisky Dave mask,
> That's what the title said, whetehr or not it's an adequate description 
> I'd leave up to
> the viewer.

But you've said that no-one in the picture was wearing a Whisky Dave mask.

Therefore, according to whar you've said, the description was not
accurate. 
Seriously, Dave, why are you even arguing with that?

>>Therefore, the description didn't match the picture. Do you need a
clearer 
>>explanation than that?
> So.
> I never said the description matched the picture and have never said
that.

But when I said that the description wasn't accurate, you said "How did
yuo 
work that one out ?"
That does rather imply that you thought I was wrong. When clearly I
wasn't.

>> Eh? You're making no sense at all.
> How would I have recognised you, if you were wearing a mask ?

You wouldn't. What's your point?

>> If you made it clear from the beginning that there was no mask,
> So you believe in Whisky dave masks, and they are avilible in whitby or
> at least seen in whitby.

*sigh* I assumed you meant someone had printed out a picture on paper and 
made a mask out of it. It's really not that hard to do, is it? You
described 
the photo as showing someone in a Whisky Dave mask, therefore, I assumed 
there was a Whisky Dave mask. Because I took you at your word. Because if
I 
don't, you whine like a kicked *****.

Now, seriously, can we drop this subject? You're trying to make out that
you 
were absolutely clear and right all along, when you very obviously
weren't, 
and you've also xclaimed you're not obsessing over that picture,a nd yet
you 
won't drop the subject, and it's creeeping me out. Drop it now.

>> Good. Then how about you stop bringing it up? And stop going on and on 
>> about it obsessively?
> I'm not all I did was point out that sometimes things disappear from a 
> site

And you had to use that particular picture as an example, _again_. Even 
though you're not really obsessed by it.
Yeah, right.

H