Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Gothic > Re: No accounti...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 23 Topic 6493 of 6934
Post > Topic >>

Re: No accounting for taste.

by Jennie Kermode <"Jennie Kermode"@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 13, 2008 at 01:02 PM

On 2008-05-13, Lostat <gordon.w@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "A magazine survey found more women want to see Mr Cameron as PM
> because they like his wife and find him attractive.

         I have no idea what his wife looks like. I could look her up, 
I'm sure, but it's not something which had occurred to me - that his 
wife should be a factor in how I might choose to vote.
         When women first got the vote, critics warned that it was 
pointless because they'd just vote the same way as their husbands. The 
reality, it seems, is far worse. Of course, whenever a female candidate 
is involved, her apparent *** appeal (or lack thereof) also becomes a 
factor and many male voters turn into morons. Nobody ever seems to ask 
us queer people which politicians we fancy.

> Nearly two thirds of the 2,000 women questioned said they would like
> to marry the Tory leader, and thought he would be good in bed."

         Who are all these women who would marry someone at the drop of 
a hat just because he's off the telly? And what, do you suppose, do 
their existing partners think?

                             Jennie

-- 
    Jennie Kermode                               jennie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
               http://www.triffid.demon.co.uk/jennie
 




 23 Posts in Topic:
No accounting for taste.
Lostat <gordon.w@[EMAI  2008-05-13 03:41:39 
Re: No accounting for taste.
Jennie Kermode <"  2008-05-13 13:02:56 
Re: No accounting for taste.
"H Duffy" <h  2008-05-13 14:09:13 
Re: No accounting for taste.
Jennie Kermode <"  2008-05-13 20:25:21 
Re: No accounting for taste.
"H Duffy" <h  2008-05-14 11:31:35 
Re: No accounting for taste.
"whisky-dave" &  2008-05-13 16:53:44 
Re: No accounting for taste.
Jennie Kermode <"  2008-05-13 20:39:31 
Re: No accounting for taste.
"whisky-dave" &  2008-05-14 13:23:50 
Re: No accounting for taste.
Jennie Kermode <"  2008-05-14 16:46:46 
Re: No accounting for taste.
"whisky-dave" &  2008-05-15 13:35:01 
Re: No accounting for taste.
"Peter H. Coffin&quo  2008-05-13 10:31:31 
Re: No accounting for taste.
Jennie Kermode <"  2008-05-13 20:40:50 
Re: No accounting for taste.
Kara <kara@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-14 07:45:53 
Re: No accounting for taste.
"whisky-dave" &  2008-05-14 13:24:25 
Re: No accounting for taste.
Jennie Kermode <"  2008-05-14 16:32:57 
Re: No accounting for taste.
"Peter H. Coffin&quo  2008-05-14 12:30:19 
Re: No accounting for taste.
Kara <kara@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-15 09:45:27 
Re: No accounting for taste.
Lostat <gordon.w@[EMAI  2008-05-13 09:51:10 
Re: No accounting for taste.
constantine@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-13 18:19:02 
Re: No accounting for taste.
Endymion <disintegrati  2008-05-13 15:29:33 
Re: No accounting for taste.
Lex Fascinetis <fascin  2008-05-14 07:15:15 
Re: No accounting for taste.
Lex Fascinetis <fascin  2008-05-14 07:16:20 
Re: No accounting for taste.
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bobo_Bonob  2008-05-14 15:27:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 16:18:44 CDT 2008.