Re: Meta post Part II

On May 3, 5:45=A0pm, Siobhan <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 2. THE BID COMMITTEES
>
> a. Restricting the bid to people we "know". In other words if not
> actual a.g people, then at least people within enough degrees of
> seperationg that we know who they are and are able to communicate with
> them.
>
>
> 3-1. HOW WE VOTE
>
> a. Using the existing database system:
>

>
> 3-2. WHO GETS TO VOTE/HOW PEOPLE GET ADDED TO THE VOTER LIST
>
>
> b. Former Convergence attendees only
> i. With weighted votes (ie, somebody who attended six gets six votes,
> somebody who attended one gets one vote) or


> 4. THE C*B*L
> "More transparency" seems to be the main suggestion, but I'm not sure
> what that means. Who does what? Will having the wiki available be
> enough?
>


3-2 d. That can lead to ballot stuffing.  You send invites to all your
friends (even if they would never attend) just so that they would vote
for your bid.  BIG no in my book!