Re: Meta post

shannon_c_scott@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes:
> Siobhan <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>> 4. The C*b*l itself. More transparency? Elected? Fixed terms? Only
>> previous C* organizers? Do you even care, as long as they get the job
>> done?
>
> C*b*l seems more than adequate as it is.  Knowing who to thank for
> slogging through all of this every year is really nice though.

I hereby state my approval of the Cabal, since after all the Cabal will
remain the Cabal whether or not I approve of it. 

By the way... if voting is problematic, why not just drop the vote? 
Why *not* just let the Cabal choose the winning bid directly?